Cited by 121Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life ManagementFungal Plant Pathogen ControlPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

β-1,3-glucanase activity of two saprophytic yeasts and possible mode of action as biocontrol agents against postharvest diseases

Castoria, Raffaello, De Curtis, Filippo, Lima, Giuseppe, De Cicco, Vincenzo·1997·Postharvest Biology and Technology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0925-5214(97)00061-6

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Droby, 1991, Antagonistic microorganisms as biocontrol agents of postharvest diseases of fruit and vegetables, Postharvest News Information, 2, 169
  2. El Ghaouth, A., 1994. Manipulation of defence systems with elicitors to control postharvest diseases. In: Wilson, C.L., Wisniewski, M.E. (Eds.), Biological Control of Postharvest Diseases—Theory and Practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 153–167.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 121

Metadata

Authors
Castoria, R., De Curtis, F., Lima, G., & De Cicco, V.
Affiliations
University of Molise (IT)
Corresponding author
Castoria, Raffaello
Venue
Postharvest Biology and Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-12
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
293-300
ISSN
0925-5214 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049513638
Cited by
121
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Postharvest Biology and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi del Molise (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Keywords
β-1,3-glucanase, Rhodotorula glutinis, Cryptococcus laurentii, biological control, postharvest disease, antagonistic activity, nutrient competition, Penicillium expansum, Botrytis cinerea, antibiosis, mechanism of action

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review