The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Induced technological change and the attractiveness of CO2 abatement policies
Open accessAbstract
This paper investigates the significance of induced technological change (ITC) for the attractiveness of CO2 abatement policies. We use analytical and numerical general equilibrium models in which technological change results from profit-maximizing investments in R&D. We show that carbon abatement policies have very different impacts on R&D across industries, and do not necessarily raise the economy-wide rate of technological progress. Focusing only on the sectors with positive R&D impacts can lead to substantial underassessment of the GDP costs of CO2 abatement policies. The presence of ITC implies lower costs of achieving a given abatement target, but it implies higher gross costs (costs before netting out environment-related benefits) of a given carbon tax. Gross costs depend importantly on the efficiency of R&D markets prior to the introduction of CO2 policies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the mechanics of economic development
Lucas, R. E. (1988) · Journal of Monetary Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7 · Cited by 24,085
Endogenous Technological Change
Romer, P. M. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261725 · Cited by 17,711
Cited by
Carbon Taxes, Path Dependency, and Directed Technical Change: Evidence from the Auto Industry
Aghion, P., Dechezleprêtre, A., Hémous, D., Martin, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2016) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/684581 · Cited by 1,604
Environmental Policy and Directed Technological Change: Evidence from the European Carbon Market
Calel, R., & Dechezleprêtre, A. (2016) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00470 · Cited by 1,147
Environmental Policy and Technological Change
Jaffe, A. B., Newell, R. G., & Stavins, R. N. (2002) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1023/a:1015519401088 · Cited by 1,050
Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy
Goulder, L. H., & Parry, I. W. H. (2008) · Review of Environmental Economics and Policy · doi:10.1093/reep/ren005 · Cited by 891
Self-citationThe impact of energy conservation on technology and economic growth
Smulders, S., & de Nooij, M. (2003) · Resource and Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/s0928-7655(02)00017-9 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Goulder, L. H., & Schneider, S. H.
- Venue
- Resource and Energy Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 211-253
- ISSN
- 0928-7655 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056651849
- Cited by
- 577
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 42.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Induced technological change and the attractiveness of CO2 abatement policies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0928-7655(99)00004-4
- The paper
- Goulder, L. H., & Schneider, S. H. (1999). Induced technological change and the attractiveness of CO2 abatement policies. Resource and Energy Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0928-7655(99)00004-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.