Cited by 1,604Climate Change Policy and EconomicsEnergy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

Carbon Taxes, Path Dependency, and Directed Technical Change: Evidence from the Auto Industry

Open access
Aghion, Philippe, Dechezleprêtre, Antoine, Hémous, David, Martin, Ralf, Van Reenen, John·2016·Journal of Political Economy

Abstract

Can directed technical change be used to combat climate change? We construct new firm-level panel data on auto industry innovation distinguishing between “dirty” (internal combustion engine) and “clean” (e.g., electric, hybrid, and hydrogen) patents across 80 countries over several decades. We show that firms tend to innovate more in clean (and less in dirty) technologies when they face higher tax-inclusive fuel prices. Furthermore, there is path dependence in the type of innovation (clean/dirty) both from aggregate spillovers and from the firm’s own innovation history. We simulate the increases in carbon taxes needed to allow clean technologies to overtake dirty technologies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/684581

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased energy price, carbon tax, and the EU ETS can facilitate low-carbon innovation.

    “The empirical literature confirms that increased energy price20, carbon tax21, and the EU ETS22 can facilitate low-carbon innovation.”

    From Low-carbon innovation induced by emissions trading in China (2019) · cites this paper as [21]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aghion, P., Dechezleprêtre, A., Hémous, D., Martin, R., & Van Reenen, J.
Affiliations
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CA)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
  • INSEAD (FR)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Venue
Journal of Political Economy
Published
2016-02
Volume
124
Issue
1
Pages
1-51
ISSN
  • 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-534X
OpenAlex
W3021625863
Cited by
1,604
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 499 · 2025: 267 · 2024: 181 · 2023: 168 · 2022: 129 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
105.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Journal of Political Economy (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment
  • Economic and Social Research Council (PTA-026-27-2756, ES/I015760/1, ES/M010341/1, ES/K006576/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
carbon tax, path dependence, directed technical change, automotive industry, clean technology innovation, internal combustion engines, electric vehicles, hydrogen vehicles, hybrid vehicles, fuel prices, patents, climate policy, innovation spillovers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review