Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 391

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Research in software engineering: an analysis of the literature

Glass, R.L., Vessey, I., Ramesh, V.·2002·Information and Software Technology
DOI 10.1016/s0950-5849(02)00049-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0950-5849(02)00049-6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Alavi, 1992, A review of MIS research and disciplinary development: implications for Deans/Administrators, Journal of Management Information Systems, 8, 45, 10.1080/07421222.1992.11517938 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Barki, 1988, An information systems keyword classification scheme, MIS Quarterly, 12, 299, 10.2307/248855 · DOI
  3. M.J. Cheon, V. Grover, R. Sabherwal, The evolution of empirical research in IS: A study in IS maturity, Information and Management, 24 (1993) 107–119. · DOI
  4. Culnan, 1986, Research in management information systems 1980–1984: points of work and reference, MIS Quarterly, 10, 289, 10.2307/249263 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Farhoomand, 2000, A historiographical examination of information systems, Communication of the AIS, 1, 19
  6. Fenton, 1994, Science and substance: a challenge to software engineers, IEEE Software, July
  7. Glass, 2001, An assessment of systems and software engineering scholars and institutions, Journal of Systems and Software, 59, 1, 10.1016/S0164-1212(01)00052-8 · DOI
  8. Glass, 1995, Contemporary application-domain taxonomies, IEEE Software, July, 63, 10.1109/52.391837 · DOI
  9. Glass, 1995, A structure-based critique of contemporary computing research, Journal of Systems and Software, Jan
  10. Glass, 1994, The software-research crisis, IEEE Software, Nov
  11. Glass, 1992, A comparative analysis of the topic areas of computer science, software engineering, and information systems, Journal of Systems and Software, Nov, 277, 10.1016/0164-1212(92)90056-P · DOI
  12. Gregg, 2001, Understanding the philosophical underpinnings of software engineering research in information systems, Information Systems Frontiers, 3, 169, 10.1023/A:1011491322406 · DOI
  13. Hamilton, 1982, MIS research strategies, Information and Management, 5, 339, 10.1016/0378-7206(82)90033-7 · DOI
  14. Hamilton, 1982, Knowledge utilization among MIS researchers, MIS Quarterly, 6, 61, 10.2307/249067 · DOI
  15. Harrison, 2000, A meta-analysis of multidisciplinary research, In Papers from The Conference on Empirical Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE), 1
  16. Lai, 1997, Exploring the research in information technology implementation, Information and Management, 32, 187, 10.1016/S0378-7206(97)00022-0 · DOI
  17. Morrison, 1995, Exploring the software engineering component in MIS research, Communications of the ACM, 38, 80, 10.1145/213859.214802 · DOI
  18. Orlikowski, 1991, Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions, Information Systems Research, 2, 1, 10.1287/isre.2.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Potts, 1993, Software engineering research revisited, IEEE Software, May
  20. Redwine, 1985, Software technology maturation, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Software Engineering, London, 189
  21. Shaw, 2001, The coming of age of software architecture research, Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering, May
  22. Swanson, 1993, Information systems research thematics: submissions to a new journal, 1987–1992, Information Systems Research, 4, 299, 10.1287/isre.4.4.299 · DOI
  23. SWEBOK, Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge, sponsored and published by the ACM and IEEE Computer Society, ongoing (the official Version 1.0 is expected to be published in the 2002 time frame, but interim drafts are available before that).
  24. Tichy, 1992, Future directions in software engineering, summary of the Dagstuhl Workshop, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, Nov, 1993
  25. Tichy, 1995, Experimental evaluation in computer science: a quantitative study, Journal of Systems and Software, Jan
  26. Westin, 1994, Cross-fertilizations of knowledge: the case of MIS and its reference disciplines, Information Resources Management Journal, 7, 24, 10.4018/irmj.1994040103 · DOI
  27. Zelkowitz, 2002, Impediments to software engineering technology transfer, Journal of Systems and Software
  28. Zelkowitz, 1997, Experimental validation in software engineering, Information and Software Technology, 39, 735, 10.1016/S0950-5849(97)00025-6 · DOI

Cited by

See all 391

Metadata

Authors
Glass, R. L., Vessey, I., & Ramesh, V.
Venue
Information and Software Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-06
Volume
44
Issue
8
Pages
491-506
ISSN
0950-5849 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0950-5849(02)00049-6
OpenAlex
W2082372845
Cited by
391
References
2
FWCI
41.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Research in software engineering: an analysis of the literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0950-5849(02)00049-6
The paper
Glass, R. L., Vessey, I., & Ramesh, V. (2002). Research in software engineering: an analysis of the literature. Information and Software Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0950-5849(02)00049-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.