Cited by 246Medication Adherence and ComplianceAsthma and respiratory diseasesPharmacy and Medical Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Compliance in asthma

Open access
Cochrane, G.M., Horne, R., Chanez, P.·1999·Respiratory Medicine

Abstract

Low rates of compliance with medication pose a major challenge to the effective management of most chronic diseases, including asthma. The high medical and social costs of non-compliance, and the apparent lack of effective methods for dealing with it, has stimulated renewed interest in this complex issue. Two broad categories of non-compliance have been identified, namely unintentional (or 'accidental') and intentional (or 'deliberate'). Unintentional non-compliance may result from poor doctor-patient communication or a lack of ability to follow advice. Intentional non-compliance occurs when the patient knows what is required but decides not to follow this to some degree. Healthcare professionals need to be aware of the various issues affecting compliance in all patients. The reasons for non-compliance are many and varied, and include factors such as complexity of the treatment regimen, administration route, patient beliefs about therapy and other psychological factors. Improvement in patient compliance with therapy will require better doctor-patient communication, improved patient education, the tailoring of therapy to the individual and possible novel strategies such as offering feedback to the patients on their level of compliance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0954-6111(99)90260-3

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cochrane, 1995, Compliance in asthma: a European perspective, Eur Respir J, 5, 116
  2. Malton, 1996, A comparison of in-vitro drug delivery from salbutamol Diskus and terbutaline Turbohaler inhalers, J Pharm Med, 6, 35
  3. Price, 1997, Does the addition of a long-acting beta-agonist reduce compliance with inhaled steroid prophylaxis in practice, Am J Resp Crit Care Med, 157, A274

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cochrane, G. M., Horne, R., & Chanez, P.
Affiliations
  • St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
  • University of Brighton (GB)
  • Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve (FR)
Venue
Respiratory Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-11
Volume
93
Issue
11
Pages
763-769
ISSN
0954-6111 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016277634
Cited by
246
References
47
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Respiratory Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Keywords
medication adherence, asthma, non-compliance, physician-patient communication, patient education, psychological factors
MeSH terms
Asthma, Drug Administration Schedule, Humans, Patient Compliance, Treatment Refusal, Anti-Asthmatic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review