The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of encapsulation techniques of probiotics for yoghurt
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Probiotic functional foods: Survival of probiotics during processing and storage
Tripathi, M. K., & Giri, S. K. (2014) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2014.04.030 · Cited by 1,181
Chávarri, M., Marañón, I., Ares, R., Ibáñez, F. C., Marzo, F., & Villarán, M. D. C. (2010) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.06.022 · Cited by 699
Encapsulation Technologies for Active Food Ingredients and Food Processing
(2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1008-0 · Cited by 631
Nanotechnology in agro-food: From field to plate
Dasgupta, N., Ranjan, S., Mundekkad, D., Ramalingam, C., Shanker, R., & Kumar, A. (2015) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2015.01.005 · Cited by 437
Acid, Bile, and Heat Tolerance of Free and Microencapsulated Probiotic Bacteria
Ding, W. K., & Shah, N. P. (2007) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00565.x · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Krasaekoopt, W., Bhandari, B., & Deeth, H.
- Venue
- International Dairy Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-13
- ISSN
- 0958-6946 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082405022
- Cited by
- 810
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of encapsulation techniques of probiotics for yoghurt. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0958-6946(02)00155-3
- The paper
- Krasaekoopt, W., Bhandari, B., & Deeth, H. (2003). Evaluation of encapsulation techniques of probiotics for yoghurt. International Dairy Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0958-6946(02)00155-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
