Control of developmental timing in Caenorhabditis elegans
Abstract
Studies of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans have identified genetic and molecular mechanisms controlling temporal patterns of developmental events. Mutations in genes of the C. elegans heterochronic pathway cause altered temporal patterns of larval development, in which cells at certain larval stages execute cell division patterns or differentiation programs normally specific for other stages. The products of the heterochronic genes include transcriptional and translational regulators and two different cases of novel small translational regulatory RNAs. Other genes of the pathway encode evolutionarily conserved proteins, including a homolog of the Drosophila Period circadian timing regulator, and a member of the nuclear receptor family of proteins. These regulators interact with each other to elaborate stage-specific regulatory switches and act through downstream effectors to control the timing of cell-type-specific developmental events.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Heterochronic RNAs in C. elegans control cell cycle progression and a particular sequence of cell divisions that is necessary for the generation of a specific cell type.
“Heterochronic RNAs in C. elegans control cell cycle progression and a particular sequence of cell divisions that is necessary for the generation of a specific cell type (Ambros 2000).”
From A microRNA array reveals extensive regulation of microRNAs during brain development (2003) · cites this paper as Ambros 2000
In C. elegans both lin-4 miRNA and its target lin-14 mRNA associate with polyribosomes and lin-4 inhibits the translation of lin-14 mRNA after initiation of its translation.
“In C. elegans both lin-4 miRNA and its target lin-14 mRNA associate with polyribosomes and lin-4 inhibits the translation of lin-14 mRNA after initiation of its translation (Ambros 2000).”
From A microRNA array reveals extensive regulation of microRNAs during brain development (2003) · cites this paper as Ambros 2000
Cites
Wightman, B., Ha, I., & Ruvkun, G. (1993) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90530-4 · Cited by 4,292 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A microRNA array reveals extensive regulation of microRNAs during brain development
KRICHEVSKY, A. M., KING, K. S., DONAHUE, C. P., KHRAPKO, K., & KOSIK, K. S. (2003) · RNA · doi:10.1261/rna.5980303 · Cited by 1,040 · see citing works
Unearthing the phylogenetic roots of sleep
Allada, R., & Siegel, J. M. (2008) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.06.033 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Tang, W., Tang, J., He, J., Zhou, Z., Qin, Y., Qin, J., Li, B., Xu, X., Geng, Q., Jiang, W., et al. (2015) · Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1111/jcmm.12454 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ambros, V.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Genetics & Development
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 428-433
- ISSN
- 0959-437X
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review