Cited by 35Biofuel production and bioconversionAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology

Preservation of sugar content in ensiled sweet sorghum

Schmidt, J., Sipocz, J., Kaszás, I., Szakács, G., Gyepes, A., Tengerdy, R.P.·1997·Bioresource Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0960-8524(97)00003-5

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmidt, J., Sipocz, J., Kaszás, I., Szakács, G., Gyepes, A., & Tengerdy, R. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Pannonia (HU)
  • Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU)
  • Colorado State University (US)
Corresponding author
Tengerdy, R.P.
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-04
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
9-13
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976062080
Cited by
34
References
18
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Boettcher Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Keywords
sweet sorghum, silage, sugar preservation, formic acid, lactic acid, ethanol, biofuel feedstock, silage additives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review