Cited by 23Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food

Effects of bacterial inoculants and an enzyme on the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of ensiled whole-crop sweet sorghum

Open access
Nkosi, BD, Vadlani, PV, Brijwani, K, Nanjunda, A, Meeske, R·2012·South African Journal of Animal Science

Abstract

A study was conducted to evaluate the effects of bacterial inoculation and cellulase on the fermentation quality of ensiled whole-crop sweet sorghum (WCSS, Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). The WCSS (323 g dry matter (DM)/kg, 251 g water soluble carbohydrates (WSC)/kg DM, 43 g crude protein (CP)/kg DM and 439 g neutral detergent fibre (NDF)/kg DM) was ensiled with i) no additive (control); ii) Lactobacillus buchneri (LB); iii) Lactobacillus plantarum (LP); and iv) LB+E, a combination of LB and enzyme. These treatments were ensiled in 1 L anaerobic jars for 25 days. The jars were opened on days 3, 7 and 15 to determine pH, while those of day 25 were sampled to determine nutrient composition, fermentation characteristics and aerobic stability. Inoculation reduced pH, butyric acid and ammonia-N and increased lactic acid content in sweet sorghum silage compared with the control. The aerobic stability of WCSS was improved with LB, while it was reduced with the homofermentative LP treatment compared with the control. The LB+E reduced the fibre, but increased residual WSC of silage. The aerobic stability of LB+E silage was lower than LB treated silage. Using enzymes to increase the WSC content of crops that already have high levels of WSC may result in reduced aerobic stability of silage. Further work is needed to evaluate these effects on silage produced on farm scale and on animal production performance.Keywords: Aerobic stability, enzyme, fermentation, inoculants, silage

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4314/sajas.v42i3.4

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Genstat For Windows® 2005. The guide to Genstat Release 8. Ed. Payne, R.W., VSN International Ltd., Oxford, UK.
  2. Griffiths, N.W., Mickan, F.J. & Kaiser, A.G., 2004. Chapter 5: Crops and by-products for silage. Topfodder Successful silage. (2nd ed.) Eds Kaiser, A.G., Piltz, J.W., Burns, H.M. & Griffiths, N.W. pp. 110-136.
  3. Kung Jr., L. & Shaver, R., 2001. Interpretation and use of silage fermentation analysis reports. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. Focus on Forage 3(13), 1-5.
  4. McDonald, P, Edwards, R.A., Greenhalgh, J.F.D. & Morgan, C.A., 2002. Animal Nutrition. 6 th ed. Longman Scientific and Technical. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA.
  5. Muck, R.E., 2010. Silage additives and management issues. Proceedings of Idaho Alfalfa Forage Conference, Best Western Burley Inn, Burley, Idaho, USA. 16-17 February, pp. 49-55.
  6. Wilkinson, J.M., 2005. In: Silage. Part 6: Assessing Silage Quality. Chapter 19: Analysis and clinical assessment of silage. Ed. Wilkinson, J.M., Chalcombe Publications, UK. pp. 198-208.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nkosi, B., Vadlani, P., Brijwani, K., Nanjunda, A., & Meeske, R.
Affiliations
Kansas State University (US)
Corresponding author
Nkosi, BD
Venue
South African Journal of Animal Science
Published
2012-08-15
Volume
42
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0375-1589 (ISSN-L)
  • 2221-4062
OpenAlex
W2169919571
Cited by
23
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
South African Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • King Saud University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Keywords
silage fermentation, aerobic stability, bacterial inoculants, cellulase, Lactobacillus buchneri, Lactobacillus plantarum, water-soluble carbohydrates, silage additives, lactic acid, butyrate, ammonia-N, fiber degradation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review