Cited by 67Bioenergy crop production and managementForest Biomass Utilization and ManagementEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Energy budget and greenhouse gas balance evaluation of sustainable coppice systems for electricity production

Lettens, S·2003·Biomass and Bioenergy

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0961-9534(02)00104-6

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Residue quantity, quality, decomposition rates and soil organic carbon dynamics differ between herbaceous crop/grass and short-rotation woody crop systems.

    “Residue quantity, quality, decomposition rates and, hence, SOC dynamics differ between HCG and SRWC systems [33]”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lettens, S.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Lettens, S
Venue
Biomass and Bioenergy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-03
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
179-197
ISSN
0961-9534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026908209
Cited by
67
References
21
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biomass and Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel
  • Universiteit Antwerpen
  • Vlaamse regering
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
coppice, energy crops, energy balance, greenhouse gas emissions, life cycle assessment, Miscanthus, willow, low-input agriculture, electricity generation, fossil fuel consumption, carbon sequestration, land use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review