The communal resource and information systems
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ostrom's view has been imported into models of open source and digital commons often without acknowledgement or problematisation, with notable exceptions.
“Ostrom's view has been imported into models of open source and digital commons, often without acknowledgement or problematisation, with notable exceptions (e.g., Von Krogh 2002).”
From The sustainability of open source commons (2023) · cites this paper as Von Krogh 2002
Cites
Coase, R. H. (1960) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466560 · Cited by 18,255 · see citing works
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809 · see citing works
Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm
Szulanski, G. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171105 · Cited by 7,839 · see citing works
Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: a case study
von Krogh, G., Spaeth, S., & Lakhani, K. R. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00050-7 · Cited by 1,025 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science
Hippel, E. V., & Krogh, G. V. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.2.209.14992 · Cited by 2,145 · see citing works
What’s coming next? Epistemic curiosity and lurking behavior in online communities
Schneider, A., von Krogh, G., & Jäger, P. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.008 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Self-citationThe sustainability of open source commons
Curto-Millet, D., & Corsín Jiménez, A. (2023) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2022.2046516 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- von Krogh, G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Strategic Information Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 85-107
- ISSN
- 0963-8687 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068519030
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 31.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Strategic Information Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Keywords
- community resources, knowledge sharing, social norms, organizational knowledge management, information system design, organizational knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
