The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cytochromes P450 and insecticide resistance
Open accessAbstract
The cytochrome P450-dependent monooxygenases (monooxygenases) are an extremely important metabolic system involved in the catabolism and anabolism of xenobiotics and endogenous compounds. Monooxygenase-mediated metabolism is a common mechanism by which insects become resistant to insecticides as evidenced by the numerous insect species and insecticides affected. This review begins by presenting background information about P450s, the role of monooxygenases in insects, and the different techniques that have been used to isolate individual insect P450s. Next, insecticide resistance is briefly described, and then historical information about monooxygenase-mediated insecticide resistance is reviewed. For any case of monooxygenase-mediated resistance, identification of the P450(s) involved, out of the dozens that are present in an insect, has proven very challenging. Therefore, the next section of the review focuses on the minimal criteria for establishing that a P450 is involved in resistance. This is followed by a comprehensive examination of the literature concerning the individual P450s that have been isolated from insecticide resistant strains. In each case, the history of the strain and the evidence for monooxygenase-mediated resistance are reviewed. The isolation and characterization of the P450(s) from the strain are then described, and the evidence of whether or not the isolated P450(s) is involved in resistance is summarized. The remainder of the review summarizes our current knowledge of the molecular basis of monooxygenase-mediated resistance and the implications for the future. The importance of these studies for development of effective insecticide resistance management strategies is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Carbon Monoxide-binding Pigment of Liver Microsomes
Omura, T., & Sato, R. (1964) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(20)82244-3 · Cited by 11,781
Cited by
Molecular Mechanisms of Metabolic Resistance to Synthetic and Natural Xenobiotics
Li, X., Schuler, M. A., & Berenbaum, M. R. (2007) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151104 · Cited by 2,109
Smith, L. B., Kasai, S., & Scott, J. G. (2016) · Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.pestbp.2016.03.005 · Cited by 405
Self-citationNkya, T. E., Akhouayri, I., Kisinza, W., & David, J.-P. (2013) · Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2012.10.006 · Cited by 402
Comparative analysis of detoxification enzymes in Acyrthosiphon pisum and Myzus persicae
Ramsey, J. S., Rider, D. S., Walsh, T. K., De Vos, M., Gordon, K. H. J., Ponnala, L., Macmil, S. L., Roe, B. A., & Jander, G. (2010) · Insect Molecular Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2583.2009.00973.x · Cited by 253
Haddi, K., Tomé, H. V. V., Du, Y., Valbon, W. R., Nomura, Y., Martins, G. F., Dong, K., & Oliveira, E. E. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep46549 · Cited by 208
Metadata
- Authors
- Scott, J. G.
- Venue
- Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 757-777
- ISSN
- 0965-1748 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017548405
- Cited by
- 775
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cytochromes P450 and insecticide resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0965-1748(99)00038-7
- The paper
- Scott, J. G. (1999). Cytochromes P450 and insecticide resistance. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0965-1748(99)00038-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.