Cited by 220Public-Private Partnership ProjectsRailways and European Transport PolicyTransport and Economic Policies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Big decisions, big risks. Improving accountability in mega projects

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0967-070x(02)00014-8

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 6 references

1 of the 6 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Arrow, 1970, Uncertainty and the evaluation of public investment decisions, American Economic Review, 60, 364

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 220

Metadata

Authors
Bruzelius, N., Flyvbjerg, B., & Rothengatter, W.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Aalborg University (DK)
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Corresponding author
Rothengatter, Werner
Venue
Transport Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-04
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
143-154
ISSN
0967-070X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997655726
Cited by
220
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
17.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transport Policy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public-Private Partnership Projects
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Railways and European Transport Policy
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transport and Economic Policies
Keywords
megaprojects, accountability, infrastructure investment, project risk, decision-making, transparency, performance specifications, regulatory regimes, risk capital, magnetic levitation, project failure, Denmark, Germany

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review