The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Big decisions, big risks. Improving accountability in mega projects
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Table 1 identifies all the issues involved with public sector projects after investigating various projects/samples from Bangladesh, Denmark, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Malaysia, Myanmar, Nigeria, the Netherlands, the OECD, Pakistan, the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam [9,27,34-41].”
From Blockchain Technology: Potential Applications for Public Sector E-Procurement and Project Management (2022) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“A lack of transparency is one of the main reasons for delaying public sector infrastructure-related projects in developing countries [35,36,57].”
From Blockchain Technology: Potential Applications for Public Sector E-Procurement and Project Management (2022) · cites this paper as [35]
Citations
Cites
Cost overruns in public projects
Arditi, D., Akan, G. T., & Gurdamar, S. (1985) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/0263-7863(85)90053-5 · Cited by 114
Mandel, B., Gaudry, M. J. I., & Rothengatter, W. (1997) · The Annals of Regional Science · doi:10.1007/s001680050041 · Cited by 72
BRITISH UTILITY REGULATION: THEORY, PRACTICE, AND REFORM
Helm, D. R. (1994) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/10.3.17 · Cited by 64
Accuracy of Traffic Forecasts and Cost Estimates on Large Transportation Projects
Skamris, M. K., & Flyvbjerg, B. (1996) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/1518-12 · Cited by 41
Methods for Strategic Environmental Assessment of Transport Infrastructure Plans
Gühnemann, A. (2000) · elib (German Aerospace Center) · Cited by 7
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Arrow, 1970, Uncertainty and the evaluation of public investment decisions, American Economic Review, 60, 364
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–219 of 219
Gün, M. (2019) · Advances in business information systems and analytics book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-1086-5.ch015
Public Works in North-East Italy: An Efficiency and Risk Allocation Analysis
Antoniucci, V., & Marella, G. (2020) · Green energy and technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49579-4_10
Brockmann, C. (2020) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119554721.ref
Cruz, C. O., & Marques, R. C. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36910-0_3
The Political Risk of Oil and Gas Mega Projects : A Descriptive Empirical Analysis
Veflen, M. E. (2011) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
Verweij, S., Koppenjan, J. F. M., & Hombergen, L. (2022) · Beleid en Maatschappij · doi:10.5553/benm/138900692022010
Szobi, P., Nigrin, T., & Oravec, J. (2022) · Review of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.2478/revecp-2022-0017
The Need for Innovative Financing
Gemson, J., & Thillai Rajan, A. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-1634-1_1
A Review of Construction Program Delivery Attributes: Bibliometric Analysis of Two Decades
Taheriboshrouyeh, M., Sandanayake, M. S., & Fragomeni, S. (2023) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings13102664
Pre-construction Complexity Factors Affecting Cost Performance of Infrastructure Projects
Nen, A. N. C., Isa, C. M. M., Ibrahim, C. K. I. C., & Shariff, M. S. M. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-7003-2_2
Sustainability Disclosure of Sports Mega-events: A Bibliometric Review Article
Caccialanza, A., Nito, E. D., Canonico, P., Misuraca, M., & Irpino, A. (2024) · Lecture notes in civil engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-59703-9_8
Harris, M. S. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-4483-4_1
Harris, M. S. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-4483-4_7
Caccialanza, A., Nito, E. D., & Canonico, P. (2026) · Lecture notes in civil engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-19235-6_7
Les effets socio-spatiaux des mégaprojets : l'exemple de l'autoroute Istanbul-Izmir en Turquie
Akyıldız, S. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/7ba1ca60za13dz4beaz9d54zcd5563943edc
Hrubý, M., & Osička, J. (2026) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2026.104767
Boveldt, G. T., Tori, S. M., & Keserü, I. (2026) · European Journal of Futures Research · doi:10.1186/s40309-026-00277-9
Metadata
- Authors
- Bruzelius, N., Flyvbjerg, B., & Rothengatter, W.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Aalborg University (DK)
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Rothengatter, Werner
- Venue
- Transport Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 143-154
- ISSN
- 0967-070X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1997655726
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 17.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transport Policy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public-Private Partnership Projects
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Railways and European Transport Policy
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transport and Economic Policies
- Keywords
- megaprojects, accountability, infrastructure investment, project risk, decision-making, transparency, performance specifications, regulatory regimes, risk capital, magnetic levitation, project failure, Denmark, Germany
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
