The DOI matches its Crossref record; 164 of the 164 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional imaging of brain responses to pain. A review and meta-analysis (2000)
Abstract
Brain responses to pain, assessed through positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) are reviewed. Functional activation of brain regions are thought to be reflected by increases in the regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in PET studies, and in the blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal in fMRI. rCBF increases to noxious stimuli are almost constantly observed in second somatic (SII) and insular regions, and in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and with slightly less consistency in the contralateral thalamus and the primary somatic area (SI). Activation of the lateral thalamus, SI, SII and insula are thought to be related to the sensory-discriminative aspects of pain processing. SI is activated in roughly half of the studies, and the probability of obtaining SI activation appears related to the total amount of body surface stimulated (spatial summation) and probably also by temporal summation and attention to the stimulus. In a number of studies, the thalamic response was bilateral, probably reflecting generalised arousal in reaction to pain. ACC does not seem to be involved in coding stimulus intensity or location but appears to participate in both the affective and attentional concomitants of pain sensation, as well as in response selection. ACC subdivisions activated by painful stimuli partially overlap those activated in orienting and target detection tasks, but are distinct from those activated in tests involving sustained attention (Stroop, etc.). In addition to ACC, increased blood flow in the posterior parietal and prefrontal cortices is thought to reflect attentional and memory networks activated by noxious stimulation. Less noted but frequent activation concerns motor-related areas such as the striatum, cerebellum and supplementary motor area, as well as regions involved in pain control such as the periaqueductal grey. In patients, chronic spontaneous pain is associated with decreased resting rCBF in contralateral thalamus, which may be reverted by analgesic procedures. Abnormal pain evoked by innocuous stimuli (allodynia) has been associated with amplification of the thalamic, insular and SII responses, concomitant to a paradoxical CBF decrease in ACC. It is argued that imaging studies of allodynia should be encouraged in order to understand central reorganisations leading to abnormal cortical pain processing. A number of brain areas activated by acute pain, particularly the thalamus and anterior cingulate, also show increases in rCBF during analgesic procedures. Taken together, these data suggest that hemodynamic responses to pain reflect simultaneously the sensory, cognitive and affective dimensions of pain, and that the same structure may both respond to pain and participate in pain control. The precise biochemical nature of these mechanisms remains to be investigated.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Coactivation of the ACC and anterior insula in imaging experiments is strongly linked to emotional processing and introceptive awareness (28, 35, 36).”
From Threatening a rubber hand that you feel is yours elicits a cortical anxiety response. (2007) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“This contrast indicated the involvement of large portions of the pain matrix [29], [30].”
From What are you feeling? Using functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess the modulation of sensory and affective responses during empathy for pain (2007) · cites this paper as [30]
Citations
Cites
Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain
Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,798
Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain
Laitinen, L. (1989) · Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/0303-8467(89)90128-5 · Cited by 7,565
Sokoloff, L., Reivich, M., Kennedy, C., Rosiers, M. H. D., Patlak, C. S., Pettigrew, K. D., Sakurada, O., & Shinohara, M. (1977) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1977.tb10649.x · Cited by 6,000
PENFIELD, W., & BOLDREY, E. (1937) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/60.4.389 · Cited by 4,188
Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour
Devinsky, O., Morrell, M. J., & Vogt, B. A. (1995) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/118.1.279 · Cited by 3,377
Mesulam, M. (1998) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/121.6.1013 · Cited by 3,072
Subgenual prefrontal cortex abnormalities in mood disorders
Drevets, W. C., Price, J. L., Simpson, J. R., Todd, R. D., Reich, T., Vannier, M., & Raichle, M. E. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/386824a0 · Cited by 2,693
Pain Affect Encoded in Human Anterior Cingulate But Not Somatosensory Cortex
Rainville, P., Duncan, G. H., Price, D. D., Carrier, B., & Bushnell, M. C. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5328.968 · Cited by 2,629
Bonica, J. J., Melzack, R., & Wall, P. D. (1999) · Cited by 2,537
Motor Areas of the Medial Wall: A Review of Their Location and Functional Activation
Picard, N., & Strick, P. L. (1996) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/6.3.342 · Cited by 1,712
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Cabeza, 1997, Age-related changes in neural interactions during memory encoding and retrieval: a network analysis of PET data, Brain and Cognition, 35, 369
- Créac’h, 2000, Functional MRI analysis of pain-related brain activation following acute mechanical stimulation, Am J Neuroradiology, 21
- Fitzgerald, 1998, Attentional effects in somatosensory cortex during an orientation discrimination task, Proc Soc Neurosci [abstract], 24, 44410
- Frot, 2000, Effects of noxious stimulus intensity on signals from operculo-insular cortex: an intra-cerebral recordings study in humans, Clin Neurophysiol, 111 Suppl 1, 131
- García-Larrea, 1991, Mapping study of selective attentional effects on somatosensory evoked potentials, Electroencephal Clin Neurophysiol, 82, 101
- Kupers, 1998, PET activation study in a patient with neuropathic pain is successfully treated with thalamic stimulation, Soc Neurosci (LA), 547, 1387
- O’Leary, 1997, Auditory and visual attention assessed with PET, Hum Brain Map, 5, 422, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1997)5:6<422::AID-HBM3>3.0.CO;2-5 · DOI
- Peyron R, García-Larrea L, Mertens P, Costes N, Mauguière F, Michel D, et al. Temporal pattern of cerebral blood flow (CBF) in patients with electrical motor cortex stimulation (MCS) for pain control. Soc Neurosci (Miami) October 1999 [abstract] · DOI
- Svensson, 1997, A cerebral representation of graded painful phasic and tonic heat in humans: a positron emission tomography stimuli, Vol. 8, 867
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control
Seeley, W. W., Menon, V., Schatzberg, A. F., Keller, J., Glover, G. H., Kenna, H., Reiss, A. L., & Greicius, M. D. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5587-06.2007 · Cited by 7,426
Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709 · Cited by 4,472
Empathy for Pain Involves the Affective but not Sensory Components of Pain
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093535 · Cited by 3,929
Central sensitization: a generator of pain hypersensitivity by central neural plasticity
Latremoliere, A., & Woolf, C. J. (2009) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2009.06.012 · Cited by 3,913
Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update
Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.10.003 · Cited by 3,623
Metadata
- Authors
- Peyron, R., Laurent, B., & García-Larrea, L.
- Affiliations
- Centre d'Exploration et de Recherche Médicale par Emission de Positons (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Peyron, R.
- Venue
- Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 263-288
- ISSN
- 0987-7053 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025577666
- Cited by
- 2,171
- References
- 164
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 82 · 2017: 94 · 2016: 91 · 2015: 114 · 2014: 84 · 2013: 132 · 2012: 105
- FWCI
- 19.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurophysiologie Clinique (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Keywords
- pain processing, brain activation, regional cerebral blood flow, anterior cingulate cortex, thalamus, insula, spatial summation, temporal summation, allodynia, chronic pain, analgesia, pain management, central sensitization
- MeSH terms
- Analgesia, Attention, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Cognition, Emotions, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Hyperesthesia, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Oxygen, Pain, Pain Measurement, Parietal Lobe, Receptors, Opioid, Somatosensory Cortex, Subtraction Technique, Thalamus, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Prefrontal Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review