Cited by 284Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalHeavy Metal Pollution RemediationEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

Removal of heavy metals using waste eggshell

PARK, Heung Jai, JEONG, Seong Wook, YANG, Jae Kyu, KIM, Boo Gil, LEE, Seung Mok·2007·Journal of Environmental Sciences

Abstract

The removal capacity of toxic heavy metals by the reused eggshell was studied. As a pretreatment process for the preparation of reused material from waste eggshell, calcination was performed in the furnace at 800 degrees C for 2 h after crushing the dried waste eggshell. Calcination behavior, qualitative and quantitative elemental information, mineral type and surface characteristics before and after calcination of eggshell were examined by thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), respectively. After calcination, the major inorganic composition was identified as Ca (lime, 99.63%) and K, P and Sr were identified as minor components. When calcined eggshell was applied in the treatment of synthetic wastewater containing heavy metals, a complete removal of Cd as well as above 99% removal of Cr was observed after 10 min. Although the natural eggshell had some removal capacity of Cd and Cr, a complete removal was not accomplished even after 60 min due to quite slower removal rate. However, in contrast to Cd and Cr, an efficient removal of Pb was observed with the natural eggshell rather than the calcined eggshell. From the application of the calcined eggshell in the treatment of real electroplating wastewater, the calcined eggshell showed a promising removal capacity of heavy metal ions as well as had a good neutralization capacity in the treatment of strong acidic wastewater.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1001-0742(07)60234-4

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PARK, H. J., JEONG, S. W., YANG, J. K., KIM, B. G., & LEE, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Inje University (KR)
  • Kwangwoon University (KR)
  • Dongseo University (KR)
  • Catholic Kwandong University (KR)
Corresponding author
PARK, Heung Jai
Venue
Journal of Environmental Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
19
Issue
12
Pages
1436-1441
ISSN
1001-0742 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047686821
Cited by
284
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
eggshell waste, heavy metal removal, calcination, cadmium, chromium, lead, electroplating wastewater, low-cost adsorbent
MeSH terms
Animals, Egg Shell, Electroplating, Hot Temperature, Industrial Waste, Oxides, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Waste Products, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Calcium Compounds, Metals, Heavy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review