CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 193Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Abdominal Adiposity and Clustering of Multiple Metabolic Syndrome in White, Black and Hispanic Americans

Okosun, Ike S, Liao, Youlian, Rotimi, Charles N, Prewitt, T.Elaine, Cooper, Richard S·2000·Annals of Epidemiology
DOI 10.1016/s1047-2797(00)00045-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of abdominal adiposity assessed by waist circumference (WC) with clustering of multiple metabolic syndromes (MMS) in White, Black and Hispanic Americans. MMS was defined as the occurrence of two or more of either hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, hypertriglyceridemia or hyperinsulinemia.Methods The number of MMS and fasting insulin (a surrogate measure of MMS) were each used as dependent variables in gender-specific multiple linear regression models, adjusting for age, smoking and alcohol intake. The contribution of WC to interethnic differences in clustering of MMS and fasting insulin concentration was assessed in gender-specific linear regression models. The risk of MMS due to large waist was estimated by comparing odds ratio for men with WC >/= 102 cm with those with WC < 102, and women with WC >/= 88 cm with women with WC < 88 cm in the logistic regression model adjusting for age, smoking and alcohol intake.Results WC was positively and independently associated with clustering of MMS and increased fasting insulin concentration adjusting for age, smoking and alcohol intake in the three ethnic groups (p < 0.01). Black ethnicity was associated with clustering of MMS and fasting insulin concentration (p < 0.01). Hispanic ethnicity was also associated with clustering of MMS in men and associated with fasting insulin concentration in both men and women (p < 0.01). In both men and women, the risk of MMS clustering was strongly associated with increased WC in all ethnic groups independent of BMI.Conclusion WC appears to be a marker for multiple metabolic syndromes in these ethnic groups. The results of this investigation lend support to the view that waist measurement should be considered as a clinical variable for assessing the risk of cardiovascular diseases.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1047-2797(00)00045-4

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Siedell, 1988, Abnormal fat depots measured with computed tomograph, Eur J Clin Nutr., 42, 805
  2. Lemieux, 1995, Seven year changes in visceral adipose tissue accumulation in women, Obesity Research., 3, 353s
  3. 1998, The Evidence Report, Obesity Research., 6, 51S
  4. Pouliot, 1994, Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter, Am J Cardiol., 73, 460, 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90676-9 · DOI
  5. Seidell, 1988, Abdominal fat depots measured with computed tomography, Eur J Clin Nutr., 42, 805

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 193

Related

Metadata

Authors
Okosun, I. S., Liao, Y., Rotimi, C. N., Prewitt, T. E., & Cooper, R. S.
Affiliations
  • Mercer University (US)
  • Loyola University Medical Center (US)
  • Howard University (US)
Corresponding author
Okosun, Ike S
ORCID
Venue
Annals of Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-07
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
263-270
ISSN
1047-2797 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s1047-2797(00)00045-4
OpenAlex
W2142867253
Cited by
193
References
52
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Annals of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL45508)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
abdominal fat, waist circumference, metabolic syndrome, fasting insulin, hyperinsulinemia, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertriglyceridemia, ethnic differences, African Americans, Hispanic Americans, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Abdomen, Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Black or African American, Body Constitution, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Hyperinsulinism, Hyperlipidemias, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Predictive Value of Tests, Syndrome, United States, Hypertriglyceridemia, Body Mass Index, Odds Ratio, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review