Cited by 401Physical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, DietSchool Health and Nursing Education

Increasing children's physical activity levels during recess periods in elementary schools: the effects of providing game equipment

Verstraete, Stefanie J. M., Cardon, Greet M., De Clercq, Dirk L. R., De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse M. M.·2006·European Journal of Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During recess, children can be active on a daily basis, making it an important school environmental factor for the promotion of health-related physical activity. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of providing game equipment on children's physical activity levels during morning recess and lunch break in elementary schools. METHODS: Seven elementary schools were randomly assigned to the intervention group (four schools), including 122 children (75 boys, 47 girls, mean age: 10.8 +/- 0.6 years), and to the control group (three schools), including 113 children (46 boys, 67 girls, mean age: 10.9 +/- 0.7 years). Children's activity levels were measured before and three months after providing game equipment, using MTI accelerometers. RESULTS: During lunch break, children's moderate and vigorous physical activity significantly increased in the intervention group (moderate: from 38 to 50%, vigorous: from 10 to 11%), while it decreased in the control group (moderate: from 44 to 39%, vigorous: from 11 to 5%). At morning recess, providing game equipment was effective in increasing children's moderate physical activity (from 41 to 45%), while it decreased in the control group (from 41 to 34%). CONCLUSION: Providing game equipment during recess periods was found to be effective in increasing children's physical activity levels. This finding suggests that promoting physical activity through game equipment provision during recess periods can contribute to reach the daily activity levels recommended for good health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurpub/ckl008

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verstraete, S. J. M., Cardon, G. M., De Clercq, D. L. R., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. M. M.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Verstraete, Stefanie J. M.
Venue
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2006-01-23
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
415-419
ISSN
  • 1101-1262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-360X
OpenAlex
W2118322954
Cited by
401
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 31
FWCI
9.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
children's physical activity, recess, elementary school students, lunch break, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, school environment, physical activity promotion, accelerometry
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Belgium, Child, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Leisure Activities, Male, Motor Activity, Play and Playthings, Schools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review