Patterns of telecommuting and their consequences: Framing the research agenda
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some remote workers experience increased control and autonomy over their work environment, resulting in lower family-work conflict, depression, and turnover.
“Some remote workers experience an increased sense of control and autonomy over their work environment118–120 under these circumstances, resulting in lower family–work conflict, depression and turnover121,122.”
From Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory (2022) · cites this paper as [118]
Cites
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689 · see citing works
Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1. Attachment
Rever, G. W. (1972) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-197211000-00011 · Cited by 8,446 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524 · Cited by 2,616 · see citing works
How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings
Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100615593273 · Cited by 1,788 · see citing works
Future work design research and practice: Towards an elaborated model of work design
Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D., & Cordery, J. L. (2001) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317901167460 · Cited by 617 · see citing works
Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory
Gagné, M., Parker, S. K., Griffin, M. A., Dunlop, P. D., Knight, C., Klonek, F. E., & Parent-Rocheleau, X. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00056-w · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Sewell, G., & Taskin, L. (2015) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840615593587 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Morganson, V. J., Major, D. A., Oborn, K. L., Verive, J. M., & Heelan, M. P. (2010) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683941011056941 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Bartel, C. A., Wrzesniewski, A., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0661 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Gajendran, R. S., Harrison, D. A., & Delaney‐Klinger, K. (2015) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12082 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
- Authors
- Feldman, D. C., & Gainey, T. W.
- Affiliations
- University of South Carolina (US)
- Corresponding author
- Feldman, Daniel C.
- Venue
- Human Resource Management Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 369-388
- ISSN
- 1053-4822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1967898923
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 4.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Resource Management Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Keywords
- remote work, contingent employment, job design, social isolation, employee attitudes, employee behavior, theoretical framework, management practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review