Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rotator cuff defect healing: A biomechanical and histologic analysis in an animal model

Open access
Carpenter, J.E., Thomopoulos, S., Flanagan, C.L., DeBano, C.M., Soslowsky, L.J.·1998·Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Abstract

Rotator cuff tears are one of the most common causes of pain and disability in the upper extremity. With the use of an animal model, we studied the healing response of a controlled defect in the normal supraspinatus tendon and in a tendon with a reduced intrinsic healing capacity. In 36 Sprague-Dawley rats, defects (2 mm x 2 mm) were created in the supraspinatus tendons bilaterally. To model a tendon with an intrinsically reduced capacity to heal, the tissue adjacent to the defect area in the left shoulder was treated with in situ freezing. The contralateral tendon was not frozen. After 3 (n = 12), 6 (n = 12), and 12 (n = 12) weeks, animals were killed and underwent histologic (n = 4 from each group) and biomechanical (n = 8 from each group) evaluation. An additional group of untreated animals served as a normal control group. On histologic evaluation 78% of tendons had persistent defects (defined as incomplete closure of the defect site). Over time, the tissue from both groups demonstrated an improved histologic grade but did not reach normal levels, even at 12 weeks. No histologic differences were found between defect healing in normal tendons and in those treated with in situ freezing. On biomechanical evaluation there were also no significant differences between treatment groups. Over time, an improvement occurred in tissue properties, indicating that some healing of the defects had occurred. However, these tissue properties remained an order of magnitude lower than those of normal control tendons. These findings indicate that there is an active but inadequate repair response to the defect in the rat supraspinatus tendon, which is not significantly worsened by in situ freezing of the tissue around the defect. This model has applications toward the study of techniques to improve or accelerate cuff defect healing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1058-2746(98)90007-6

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Carpenter, J. E., Thomopoulos, S., Flanagan, C. L., DeBano, C. M., & Soslowsky, L. J.
Venue
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-11
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
599-605
ISSN
1058-2746 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035308112
Cited by
268
References
11
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rotator cuff defect healing: A biomechanical and histologic analysis in an animal model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1058-2746(98)90007-6
The paper
Carpenter, J. E., Thomopoulos, S., Flanagan, C. L., DeBano, C. M., & Soslowsky, L. J. (1998). Rotator cuff defect healing: A biomechanical and histologic analysis in an animal model. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1058-2746(98)90007-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.