Cited by 264Human-Automation Interaction and SafetySocial Robot Interaction and HRIRisk and Safety Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effects of errors on system trust, self-confidence, and the allocation of control in route planning

de Vries, Peter, Midden, Cees, Bouwhuis, Don·2003·International Journal of Human-Computer Studies

DOI 10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00039-9

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00039-9

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Foundations of social theory
Riggins, F. J., & Mitra, S. (1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-6637 · Cited by 16,590
Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse
Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872097778543886 · Cited by 4,554
Untitled work
(1973) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,836
The Logic and Limits of Trust
Barber, B. (1983) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 1,800
Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995
White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(19980401)49:4 · Cited by 1,527
Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems
LEE, J., & MORAY, N. (1992) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139208967392 · Cited by 1,459
Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaptation to automation
Lee, J. D., & Moray, N. (1994) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1994.1007 · Cited by 932
Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aids
Muir, B. M. (1987) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1016/s0020-7373(87)80013-5 · Cited by 808
In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power
Zuboff, S. (1989) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2073307 · Cited by 410

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

Arion, M., Numan, J.H., Pitariu, H., Jorna, R., 1994. Placing trust in human–computer interaction. In: Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (ECCE 7), pp. 353–365.
Muir, B.M., 1989. Operators’ trust in and use of automatic controllers in a supervisory process control task. Doctoral Thesis, University of Toronto, Canada.

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 264

How operators make use of wide-choice adaptable automation: observations from a series of experimental studies
Sauer, J., & Chavaillaz, A. (2018) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922x.2017.1297866 · Cited by 26
Effect of indirect information on system trust and control allocation
de Vries, P. W., & Midden, C. C. (2006) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449290600874956 · Cited by 26
Self-citation
FACTORS THAT AFFECT TRUST AND RELIANCE ON AN AUTOMATED AID
Sánchez, J. (2006) · UPT. Syiah Kuala University Library (Syiah Kuala University) · Cited by 24
Are pilots prepared for a cyber-attack? A human factors approach to the experimental evaluation of pilots' behavior
Gontar, P., Homans, H., Rostalski, M., Behrend, J., Dehais, F., & Bengler, K. J. (2018) · Journal of Air Transport Management · doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2018.01.004 · Cited by 23
Human-automation collaboration : decision support for lunar and planetary exploration
Márquez, J. J. (2006) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 24
Unmanned aerial systems (UAS) operators’ accuracy and confidence of decisions: Professional pilots or video game players?
Wheatcroft, J. M., Jump, M., Breckell, A. L., & Adams-White, J. E. (2017) · Cogent Psychology · doi:10.1080/23311908.2017.1327628 · Cited by 22
Delegation of Moral Tasks to Automated Agents—The Impact of Risk and Context on Trusting a Machine to Perform a Task
Liehner, G. L., Brauner, P., Schaar, A. K., & Ziefle, M. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society · doi:10.1109/tts.2021.3118355 · Cited by 24
Recommended roles for uninhabited team members within mixed-initiative combat teams
Ogreten, S., Lackey, S. J., & Nicholson, D. M. (2010) · International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS) · doi:10.1109/cts.2010.5478468 · Cited by 21
Continuous Calibration of Trust in Automated Systems
Merritt, S. M., Huber, K., LaChapell-Unnerstall, J., & Lee, D. (2014) · doi:10.21236/ada606748 · Cited by 20
Psychological Effects of the Allocation Process in Human–Robot Interaction – A Model for Research on ad hoc Task Allocation
Tausch, A., Kluge, A., & Adolph, L. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564672 · Cited by 26
Trust and self-confidence based autonomy allocation for robotic systems
Saeidi, H., & Wang, Y. (2015) · IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) · doi:10.1109/cdc.2015.7403171 · Cited by 20
Adaptive Trust Calibration for Supervised Autonomous Vehicles
Okamura, K., & Yamada, S. (2018) · International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI) · doi:10.1145/3239092.3265948 · Cited by 23
A comparison of features in a crowdsourced phishing warning system
Nguyen, C., Jensen, M. L., Durcikova, A., & Wright, R. T. (2021) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12318 · Cited by 24
A Computational Model of Coupled Human Trust and Self-confidence Dynamics
Williams, K. J., Yuh, M. S., & Jain, N. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3594715 · Cited by 18
Frontiers of Brain-Inspired Autonomous Systems: How Does Defense R&D Drive the Innovations?
Hou, M., Wang, Y., Trajković, L., Plataniotis, K. N., Kwong, S., Zhou, M., Tunstel, E. W., Rudas, I. J., Kacprzyk, J., & Leung, H. (2022) · IEEE Systems Man and Cybernetics Magazine · doi:10.1109/msmc.2021.3136983 · Cited by 18
Effects of sleep deprivation on decisional support utilisation
Fraser, M., Conduit, R., & Phillips, J. G. (2013) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2012.760754 · Cited by 20
Validation of a Two Factor Structure for System Trust
Safar, J. A., & Turner, C. W. (2005) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193120504900360 · Cited by 18
Trust in human-robot interactions
Lazányi, K. R., & Hajdu, B. (2017) · IEEE International Scientific Conference on Informatics (Informatics) · doi:10.1109/informatics.2017.8327249 · Cited by 17
People Dynamically Update Trust When Interactively Teaching Robots
Chi, V. B., & Malle, B. F. (2023) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3568162.3576962 · Cited by 20
Calibrating Trust in Human-Drone Cooperative Navigation
Okamura, K., & Yamada, S. (2020) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man47096.2020.9223509 · Cited by 17
Mixing It Up: How Mixed Groups of Humans and Machines Modulate Conformity
Hertz, N., Shaw, T. H., de Visser, E., & Wiese, E. (2019) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/1555343419869465 · Cited by 15
Trust Lengthens Decision Time on Unexpected Recommendations in Human-agent Interaction
Tokushige, H., Narumi, T., Ono, S., Fuwamoto, Y., Tanikawa, T., & Hirose, M. (2017) · International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (HAI) · doi:10.1145/3125739.3125751 · Cited by 17
Trust calibration through perceptual and predictive information of the external context in autonomous vehicle
Gao, Q., Chen, L., Shi, Y., Luo, Y., Shen, M., & Gao, Z. (2024) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.019 · Cited by 17
Influence of Robots’ Voice Naturalness on Trust and Compliance
Becker, D., Braach, L., Clasmeier, L., Kaufmann, T., Ong, O., Ahrens, K., Gäde, C., Strahl, E., Fu, D., & Wermter, S. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3706066 · Cited by 20
Adaptive interaction support in ambient-aware environments based on quality of context information
Hossain, M. A., Shirehjini, A. A. N., Alghamdi, A. S., & Saddik, A. E. (2012) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-012-1008-1 · Cited by 16
Analysing Eye Gaze Patterns during Confusion and Errors in Human–Agent Collaborations
Wachowiak, L., Tisnikar, P., Canal, G., Coles, A., Leonetti, M., & Çeliktutan, O. (2022) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man53752.2022.9900589 · Cited by 16
The effect of automation trust tendency, system reliability and feedback on users' phishing detection.
Zhou, Y., Cui, X.-Y., Qu, W.-N., & Ge, Y. (2022) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103754 · Cited by 6
Human interaction with automated aids: Implications for robo‐advisors
Bartlett, M. L., & McCarley, J. S. (2019) · Financial Planning Review · doi:10.1002/cfp2.1059 · Cited by 15
Human-Agent Teaming for Multi-Robot Control: A Literature Review
Chen, J. Y., & Barnes, M. J. (2013) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · doi:10.21236/ada583900 · Cited by 16
How Do Visual Explanations Foster End Users' Appropriate Trust in Machine Learning?Preprint
Yang, F. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/s9q8t · Cited by 18
To trust or not to trust a human(-like) AI—A scoping review and conjoint analyses on factors influencing anthropomorphism and trust
Reuter, M., Kirchhoff, B. M., Franke, T., Radüntz, T., & Peifer, C. (2025) · Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s41449-025-00481-6 · Cited by 20
Trust in self-driving vehicles is lower than in human drivers when both drive almost perfectly
Yokoi, R. (2024) · Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2024.03.019 · Cited by 10
A Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Human-Robot Trust
Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Oleson, K. E., Jessie, Y. C., de Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011) · Cited by 14
Automation Use: The Roles of Self-Confidence, Trust, and Workload
Patton, C. E. (2023) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/21695067231192708 · Cited by 14
The effect of known decision support reliability on outcome quality and visual information foraging in joint decision making
Starke, S. D., & Baber, C. (2020) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103102 · Cited by 13
Conceptual Model of Human-Automation Interaction
Sánchez, J. (2009) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193120905301850 · Cited by 13
Traveler response to information
Chorus, C. G. (2007) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · Cited by 13
The Choice to Use Automation: Improvements from Evidence Accumulation
Patton, C. E., Clegg, B. A., Davis, B. C., Caglar, T., Siebert, C., & Blanchard, N. (2025) · International journal of human computer interactions · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2452189 · Cited by 12
Reliance on Automation as a Function of Expectation of Reliability, Cost of Verification, and Age
Ezer, N., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2007) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193120705100102 · Cited by 12
The existence of manual mode increases human blame for AI mistakes
Arnestad, M. N., Meyers, S., Gray, K. J., & Bigman, Y. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105931 · Cited by 11
Methods for Developing Trust Models for Intelligent Systems
Yanco, H. A., Desai, M., Drury, J. L., & Steinfeld, A. M. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7668-0_11 · Cited by 11
Sage Advice? The Impacts of Explanations for Machine Learning Models on Human Decision-Making in Spam Detection
Stites, M. C., Nyre-Yu, M., Moss, B., Smutz, C., & Smith, M. R. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77772-2_18 · Cited by 16
Impacts of Robot Beep Timings on Trust Dynamics in Human-Robot Interaction
Maehigashi, A., Tsumura, T., & Yamada, S. (2024) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-024-01181-7 · Cited by 12
Cognitive Modeling of Automation Adaptation in a Time Critical Task
Morita, J., Miwa, K., Maehigashi, A., Terai, H., Kojima, K., & Ritter, F. E. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02149 · Cited by 10
On The Security of Mobile Cockpit Information Systems
Lundberg, D. A., Farinholt, B., Sullivan, E., Mast, R., Checkoway, S., Savage, S., Snoeren, A. C., & Levchenko, K. (2014) · ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) · doi:10.1145/2660267.2660375 · Cited by 11
Clustering Human Trust Dynamics for Customized Real-Time Prediction
Liu, J.-D., Kumar, A., Misu, T., & Wu, X. (2021) · International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/itsc48978.2021.9565016 · Cited by 19
Building Trust in Assistive Robotics: Insights From a Real-World Mobile Navigation Experiment
Lingg, N., & Demiris, Y. (2023) · International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems (TAS) · doi:10.1145/3597512.3597519 · Cited by 9
“Sorry, I Don’t Understand …”: effects of task type, personality presentation and performance error on user trust of a personal digital assistant
Zhang, X., & Lee, S. K. (2024) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-01-2022-0058 · Cited by 10
Why not both? Complementing explanations with uncertainty, and self-confidence in human-AI collaboration
Papantonis, I., & Belle, V. (2025) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2025.1560448 · Cited by 14
From Human to Autonomous Driving: A Method to Identify and Draw Up the Driving Behaviour of Connected Autonomous Vehicles
Caruso, G., Yousefi, M. K., & Mussone, L. (2022) · Vehicles · doi:10.3390/vehicles4040075 · Cited by 9
Evidence Report, Risk of Inadequate Design of Human and Automation/Robotic Integration
Zumbado, J. R., Billman, D. O., Feary, M., & Green, C. (2011) · NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) · Cited by 9
Drivers’ Reliance on Lane-Keeping Assistance Systems as a Function of the Level of Assistance
Popken, A., Krems, J., & Nilsson, L. (2015) · Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/bf03373945 · Cited by 8
Designing for dynamic task allocation
van Dongen, C. J. G., & van Maanen, P. P. (2005) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · Cited by 9
Design for Human-Automation and Human-Autonomous Systems
Lee, J. D., & Seppelt, B. (2023) · Springer handbooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-96729-1_19 · Cited by 8
A Journey through the Wilderness
Kidd, T. T., Ashe, C., & Carroll, N. (2013) · International Journal of Information Technology Project Management · doi:10.4018/ijitpm.2013100101 · Cited by 8
Generalised Anxiety Disorder and Depression on Implicit and Explicit Trust Tendencies Toward Automated Systems
Crawford, J. R., Goh, Y., & Hubbard, E.-M. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3076681 · Cited by 9
The influence of coaching efficacy on trust and usage of technology in golf instruction
Rittenberg, B. S., Neyedli, H. F., Young, B. W., & Dithurbide, L. (2022) · International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching · doi:10.1177/17479541211061703 · Cited by 15
Personality Affects Dispositional Trust and History-Based Trust in Different Ways
Liang, J., Gao, Q., Li, W.-M., Shi, Y., Shen, M.-W., & Gao, Z.-F. (2022) · International journal of human computer interactions · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2055273 · Cited by 8
Multimedia-supported virtual experiment for online user–system trust studies
Semsar, A., & Shirehjini, A. A. N. (2017) · Multimedia Systems · doi:10.1007/s00530-016-0519-4 · Cited by 9
Trust as a metric for auction-based task assignment in a cooperative team of robots with heterogeneous capabilities
Grillo, A., Carpin, S., Recchiuto, C. T., & Sgorbissa, A. (2022) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2022.104266 · Cited by 7
Simple manipulations of anthropomorphism fail to induce perceptions of humanness or improve trust in an automated agent
Cockram, L., Bartlett, M. L., & McCarley, J. S. (2023) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104027 · Cited by 7
The impact of visual user interfaces on drivers’ understanding of driving control mode and hands-on steering wheel requirement in Level 2 automated vehicles
Kim, S., Nordhoff, S., van Egmond, R., & Happee, R. (2024) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2024.12.006 · Cited by 7
Building Decision Support Systems for Acceptance
Riedel, R., Fransoo, J. C., Wiers, V. C. S., Fischer, K., Cegarra, J., & Jentsch, D. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13382-4_11 · Cited by 8
Experimental Investigation of Trust in Anthropomorphic Agents as Task Partners
Maehigashi, A., Tsumura, T., & Yamada, S. (2022) · International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (HAI) · doi:10.1145/3527188.3563921 · Cited by 10
The effect of distractor modality and processing code on human-automation interaction
Phillips, R. R., & Madhavan, P. (2010) · Cognition Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-010-0163-2 · Cited by 8
Impact of Indoor Location Information Reliability on Users’ Trust of an Indoor Positioning System
Wei, T., & Bell, S. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33024-7_19 · Cited by 7
The Effect of Group Membership, System Reliability and Anthropomorphic Appearance on User’s Trust in Intelligent Decision Support System
Zou, X., Lv, C., & Zhang, J. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49183-3_18 · Cited by 7
Cooperative Tactical Planning Method for UAV Formation
Zhang, Z., Wu, J. C., Dai, J., Jin, Y., & He, C. (2020) · Chinese Control Conference (CCC) · doi:10.23919/ccc50068.2020.9189211 · Cited by 6
Design Thinking Framework for Integration of Transparency Measures in Time-Critical Decision Support
Stone, P. B., Jessup, S. A., Ganapathy, S., & Harel, A. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2068745 · Cited by 7
Self-Explaining Abilities of an Intelligent Agent for Transparency in a Collaborative Driving Context
Kridalukmana, R., Lu, H., & Naderpour, M. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2022.3202900 · Cited by 6
Experimental Investigation of Calibration and Resolution in Human-Automation System Interaction
Maehigashi, A., Miwa, K., Terai, H., Kojima, K., & Morita, J. (2013) · IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1587/transfun.e96.a.1625 · Cited by 6
If erring is human, is system use divine? Omission errors during post-adoptive system use
Goutas, L., Hess, B., & Sutanto, J. (2019) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2019.113225 · Cited by 6
Impact of ICT-mediated collective awareness on urban mobility
Zia, K., Ferscha, A., Din, A., Shahzad, K., & Majeed, A. (2016) · Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling · doi:10.1186/s40294-016-0022-y · Cited by 6
Measuring and Calibrating Trust in Artificial Intelligence
Bollaert, M., Augereau, O., & Coppin, G. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-61698-3_22 · Cited by 5
Evaluation of trust in robots: A cognitive approach
Kumar, B. A., & Dubey, A. D. (2017) · International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI) · doi:10.1109/iccci.2017.8117701 · Cited by 5
Effects of Beep-Sound Timings on Trust Dynamics in Human-Robot Interaction
Maehigashi, A., Tsumura, T., & Yamada, S. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24670-8_57 · Cited by 5
Assessing Technology in the Absence of Proof
de Vries, P. D., van den Berg, S. M., & Midden, C. (2015) · Hum. Factors · doi:10.1177/0018720815598604 · Cited by 7
Self-citation
Be Inaccurate but Don’t Be Indecisive: How Error Distribution Can Affect User Experience
Padovani, R. R., Ferreira, L. N., & Lelis, L. H. S. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33012604 · Cited by 6
Automated Systems and Trust: Mineworkers' Trust in Proximity Detection Systems for Mobile Machines
Swanson, L. R., Bellanca, J. L., & Helton, J. (2019) · Safety and Health at Work · doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2019.09.003 · Cited by 5
Trust-aware control in proximate human-robot teaming
Washburn, A., Matsumoto, S., & Riek, L. D. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819472-0.00015-0 · Cited by 5
Driver trust and reliance on a navigation system: Effect of graphical display
Barthou, A., Kemeny, A. A., Reymond, G., Merienne, F., & Berthoz, A. (2010) · SAM, the Arts et Métiers ParisTech open access repository (Paris Institute of Technology) · Cited by 5
Trust in systems:effects of direct and indirect information
Vries, D. P. P. (2005) · TU/e Research Portal · doi:10.6100/ir583496 · Cited by 5
Play MNIST For Me! User Studies on the Effects of Post-Hoc, Example-Based Explanations & Error Rates on Debugging a Deep Learning, Black-Box ClassifierPreprint
Ford, C., Kenny, E. M., & Keane, M. T. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.06349 · Cited by 7
Decision-making efficiency with aided information: the impact of automation reliability and task difficulty
Zhang, H.-S., Zhou, R., Cheng, C., Huang, S.-H., Cheng, M., & Yang, C.-T. (2025) · Cognitive Research · doi:10.1186/s41235-025-00659-w · Cited by 3
Questioning trust in AI research: exploring the influence of trust assessment on dependence in AI-assisted decision-making
Schrills, T., Franke, T., Hoesterey, S., & Roesler, E. (2025) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2025.2553153 · Cited by 5
Assessing How Driving Self-Efficacy Influences Situational Trust in Driver Assist Technologies
Ferraro, J. C., & Mouloua, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181322661476 · Cited by 4
The Behavior of Agricultural Decision-Makers towards the Adoption of Sustainable Process Innovations in Germany
Otter, V., & Deutsch, M. (2023) · German Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.30430/gjae.2023.0122 · Cited by 4
Trust and Complacency in Cyber Security
Cain, A. A. (2016) · San José State University ScholarWorks (San Jose State University) · doi:10.31979/etd.a4nf-q57u · Cited by 4
Context conditions drivers' disposition towards alarms
Lees, M. N. (2010) · doi:10.17077/etd.188inyqs · Cited by 8
Interactive Human-Robot Teaching Recovers and Builds Trust, Even With Imperfect Learners
Chi, V. B., & Malle, B. F. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3610977.3634977 · Cited by 3
False sense of security and a flurry of misplaced trust: the construction of trust in and by Facebook
Bodó, B., Bene, M., & Boda, Z. (2025) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2025.2482651 · Cited by 3
Predicting Trust Dynamics Type Using Seven Personal Characteristics
Chung, H., & Yang, X. J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2025.3627578 · Cited by 3
Computer Aided Detection: Risks and benefits for radiologists' decisions
Alberdi, E., Povyakalo, A. A., Strigini, L., & Ayton, P. (2009) · Cited by 3
Feedback and Direction Sources Influence Navigation Decision Making on Experienced Routes
Li, Y., Li, W., Yang, Y., & Wang, Q. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02104 · Cited by 3
Model evaluation in human factors and ergonomics (HFE) sciences; case of trust in automation
Poornikoo, M., & Øvergård, K. I. (2023) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922x.2023.2233591 · Cited by 3
Exploring the Dynamic Nature of Trust Using Interventions in a Human-AI Collaborative Task
Weerawardhana, S., Akintunde, M. E., & Moreau, L. (2024) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/faia240206 · Cited by 3
Evaluating Strategies to Restore Trust in Decision Support Systems in Cross-Company Cooperation
Philipsen, R., Brauner, P., Valdez, A. S. C., & Ziefle, M. (2018) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94196-7_11 · Cited by 3
The Effect of Perceived Consequence on Automation Reliance in a Human-Automation Collaborative System
Ezer, N., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2005) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193120504902107 · Cited by 3
Modeling Decision Making on the Use of Automation
Morita, J., Miwa, K., Maehigashi, A., Terai, H., Kojima, K., & Ritter, F. E. (2011) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 3
How can level of trust in conditional driving automation vehicles be improved? Road condition feedback strategies and the mediating role of anxiety
Sun, Q., Yao, J., Cheng, P., & Hou, S. (2024) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2024.2420183 · Cited by 2

Authors: de Vries, P., Midden, C., & Bouwhuis, D.
Affiliations: Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Venue: International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2003-06
Volume: 58
Issue: 6
Pages: 719-735
ISSN: 1071-5819 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00039-9
OpenAlex: W2062672584
Cited by: 264
References: 23
Citations by year: 2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI: 6.03
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (publishedVersion)
TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion)
TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Risk and Safety Analysis
Keywords: trust in automation, system trust, self-confidence, control allocation, route planning, human-automation interaction, uncertainty, mode choice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The effects of errors on system trust, self-confidence, and the allocation of control in route planning

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks