CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 264Human-Automation Interaction and SafetySocial Robot Interaction and HRIRisk and Safety Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effects of errors on system trust, self-confidence, and the allocation of control in route planning

de Vries, Peter, Midden, Cees, Bouwhuis, Don·2003·International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
DOI 10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00039-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00039-9

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Arion, M., Numan, J.H., Pitariu, H., Jorna, R., 1994. Placing trust in human–computer interaction. In: Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (ECCE 7), pp. 353–365.
  2. Muir, B.M., 1989. Operators’ trust in and use of automatic controllers in a supervisory process control task. Doctoral Thesis, University of Toronto, Canada.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 264

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
de Vries, P., Midden, C., & Bouwhuis, D.
Affiliations
Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Venue
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-06
Volume
58
Issue
6
Pages
719-735
ISSN
1071-5819 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00039-9
OpenAlex
W2062672584
Cited by
264
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Risk and Safety Analysis
Keywords
trust in automation, system trust, self-confidence, control allocation, route planning, human-automation interaction, uncertainty, mode choice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review