Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 550

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients

Vignali, Andrea, Fazio, Victor W, Lavery, Ian C, Milsom, Jeffrey W, Church, James M, Hull, Tracy L, Strong, Scott A, Oakley, John R·1997·Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite improvement in surgical techniques and stapling devices during the last 10 years, colorectal anastomoses are still prone to leakage. The purpose of this study was to assess the performance and safety of stapled anastomoses in rectal surgery and to identify factors that influence the occurrence of anastomotic leaks. STUDY DESIGN: A review was undertaken of 1,014 patients who underwent stapled anastomoses to the rectum or anal canal for colorectal cancer or benign disease between 1989 and 1995 in a tertiary care institution. Indications for operations, comorbidities at admission, preoperative bowel preparation, stapler size, intraoperative events, associated surgical procedures, and clinical outcomes were tested for any association with anastomotic leak. RESULTS: A double stapled technique was used in 154 patients and a conventional single stapler technique was used in 860. Postoperative mortality was 1.6%, and the overall morbidity was 18.4%. Clinically apparent anastomotic leak developed in 29 patients (2.9%). Anastomotic dehiscence occurred in 22 of 284 patients (7.7%) after low stapling (within 7 cm from the anal verge) and in 7 of 730 patients (1%) after high stapling (p < 0.001). Diabetes mellitus, use of pelvic drainage, and duration of surgery were significantly related to the occurrence of anastomotic leak by the univariate analysis. Multivariate regression analysis identified an anastomotic distance from the anal verge within 7 cm as the only variable related to the occurrence of postoperative leak (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Low anastomoses were associated with a leak rate greater than with high colorectal anastomoses. We conclude that anastomoses to the rectum using the circular stapler can be done with low mortality and morbidity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1072-7515(01)00891-2

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 550

Metadata

Authors
Vignali, A., Fazio, V. W., Lavery, I. C., Milsom, J. W., Church, J. M., Hull, T. L., Strong, S. A., & Oakley, J. R.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published
1997-08
Volume
185
Issue
2
Pages
105-113
ISSN
1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033451464
Cited by
550
References
0
FWCI
4.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1072-7515(01)00891-2
The paper
Vignali, A., Fazio, V. W., Lavery, I. C., Milsom, J. W., Church, J. M., Hull, T. L., Strong, S. A., & Oakley, J. R. (1997). Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1072-7515(01)00891-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.