The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sources of Absorption and Scattering Contrast for Near-Infrared Optical Mammography
Open accessAbstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Near-infrared (NIR) diffuse optical spectroscopy and imaging may enhance existing technologies for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment. NIR techniques are based on sensitive, quantitative measurements of functional contrast between healthy and diseased tissue. In this study, the authors quantified the origins of this contrast in healthy breasts. MATERIALS AND METHODS A seven-wavelength frequency-domain photon migration probe was used to perform noninvasive NIR measurements in the breasts of 28 healthy women, both pre- and postmenopausal, aged 18-64 years. A diffusive model of light transport quantified oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin, water, and lipid by their absorption signatures. Changes in the measured light-scattering spectra were quantified by means of a "scatter power" parameter. RESULTS Substantial quantitative differences were observed in both absorption and scattering spectra of breast as a function of subject age. These physiologic changes were consistent with long-term hormone-dependent transformations that occur in breast. Instrument response was not adversely affected by subject age or menopausal status. CONCLUSION These measurements provide new insight into endogenous optical absorption and scattering contrast mechanisms and have important implications for the development of optical mammography. NIR spectroscopy yields quantitative functional information that cannot be obtained with other noninvasive radiologic techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Optical properties of biological tissues: A review
Jacques, S. L. (2013) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/58/11/r37 · Cited by 4,008
Photoacoustics: a historical review
Manohar, S., & Razansky, D. (2016) · Advances in Optics and Photonics · doi:10.1364/aop.8.000586 · Cited by 319
Electromagnetic Breast Imaging: Results of a Pilot Study in Women with Abnormal Mammograms
Poplack, S. P., Tosteson, T. D., Wells, W. A., Pogue, B. W., Meaney, P. M., Hartov, A., Kogel, C. A., Soho, S. K., Gibson, J. J., & Paulsen, K. D. (2007) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2432060286 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Cerussi, A. E., Berger, A. J., Bevilacqua, F., Shah, N., Jakubowski, D., Butler, J., Holcombe, R. F., & Tromberg, B. J.
- Venue
- Academic Radiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 211-218
- ISSN
- 1076-6332 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162335948
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sources of Absorption and Scattering Contrast for Near-Infrared Optical Mammography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80529-9
- The paper
- Cerussi, A. E., Berger, A. J., Bevilacqua, F., Shah, N., Jakubowski, D., Butler, J., Holcombe, R. F., & Tromberg, B. J. (2001). Sources of Absorption and Scattering Contrast for Near-Infrared Optical Mammography. Academic Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80529-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.