Cited by 67Indoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureAsthma and respiratory diseasesAllergic Rhinitis and Sensitization

Mouse allergens in urban elementary schools and homes of children with asthma

Open access
Sheehan, William J., Rangsithienchai, Pitud A., Muilenberg, Michael L., Rogers, Christine A., Lane, Jeffrey P., Ghaemghami, Jalal, Rivard, Donald V., Otsu, Kanao +4 more·2009·Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology

Abstract

Background The association between allergens in schools and childhood asthma has not been well studied, particularly in the United States.Objective To investigate allergen exposure in schools compared with homes with a specific focus on children with asthma.Methods Dust samples were collected from 46 rooms in 4 urban elementary schools (northeastern United States) and from 38 student bedrooms. Samples were analyzed for cat (Fel d 1), dog (Can f 1), cockroach (Bla g 2), dust mites (Der f 1/Der p 1), and mouse urinary protein (MUP). Questionnaires identified students with physician-diagnosed asthma.Results Cat and dog allergens were detectable in most school samples (96% and 78%, respectively), but at low levels. Cockroach allergen was detectable in only 11% of school samples. Mouse allergen was detectable in 89% of school samples, with 68% having MUP levels greater than 0.5 microg/g. In contrast, MUP was detectable in only 26% of bedroom samples. Matched classroom and home samples from 23 asthmatic students showed higher geometric mean MUP levels in the classroom vs the home (6.45 microg/g vs 0.44 microg/g, P < .001). However, there were lower geometric mean dust mite (Der f 1) levels in the classroom vs the home (0.04 microg/g vs 0.66 microg/g, P < .001).Conclusions There are significantly higher levels of MUP but lower levels of Der f 1 in schools vs homes. It is important to recognize that children with asthma may encounter varying levels of allergens in environments outside the home, such as schools.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)60242-6

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mouse allergen exposure is more common in low-income urban environments, with high concentrations often found in homes and schools.

    “Mouse allergen exposure, much like that of cockroaches, is more prevalent in low-income urban environments, with high concentrations frequently detected in homes and schools (40,41,42).”

    From Indoor Allergen Interventions in Homes and Schools for Managing Asthma (2025) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Results and Discussion (page unavailable) report high mouse-allergen levels in the urban schools studied and cite other studies finding mouse allergen in urban homes. But most homes sampled in this study had no detectable mouse allergen, and schools with higher levels did not have lower reported household incomes. The paper therefore does not support the claim that high concentrations were frequently found in both homes and schools in low-income environments. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]Ingram JM Sporik R Rose G Honsinger R Chapman MD Platts-Mills TA Quantitative assessment of exposure to dog (Can f 1) and cat (Fel d 1) allergens: relation to sensitization and asthma among children living in Los Alamos, New Mexico Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 1995 96 449 56 7560654

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheehan, W. J., Rangsithienchai, P. A., Muilenberg, M. L., Rogers, C. A., Lane, J. P., Ghaemghami, J., Rivard, D. V., Otsu, K., Hoffman, E. B., Israel, E., Gold, D. R., & Phipatanakul, W.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Phipatanakul, Wanda
Venue
Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
102
Issue
2
Pages
125-130
ISSN
1081-1206 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058698606
Cited by
67
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (K23AI054972, R01AI073964, T32AI007512)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Keywords
mouse allergen, urinary protein, childhood asthma, school dust, indoor allergen exposure, cockroach allergens, house dust mites, cat allergen, dog allergen, urban elementary schools
MeSH terms
Allergens, Animals, Asthma, Cats, Child, Cockroaches, Dogs, Dust, Female, Housing, Humans, Male, Proteins, Schools, United States, Antigens, Dermatophagoides, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review