Electric stimulation of the cingulum bundle precipitates onset of autotomy induced by inflammation in rat
Abstract
The purpose of this work was to test if electric stimulation of the cingulum bundle in animals subjected to a hindpaw inflammatory process precipitates the onset and enhances autotomy behaviour. Wistar rats were implanted with bipolar parallel electrodes in the boundary of the cingulum bundle. The inflammatory process was induced in all subjects by injection of carrageenan. The groups were: A, sham; B, implanted and stimulated 10 min daily for 7 days; C, implanted and stimulated 2 h daily, for 7 days. Both groups were injected with CAR 2 days after ending the stimulation period; and D, implanted and stimulated 10 min daily for 5 days, the first stimulation being simultaneous to CAR injection. Results show that 100% of the subjects in stimulated groups presented autotomy as compared with 66% in the sham group. A significant shortening of the onset and increased rates in autotomy were observed in experimental groups (B, C and D) as compared to the sham group. We did not find differences between groups B and C, but there was an increment of autotomy in group D when compared with both B and C groups. We conclude that it is possible to facilitate the onset and to increase the intensity of the autotomy triggered by the inflammatory process with cingulum bundle electrical stimulation. The results also suggest that a fundamental condition to the development of the autotomy in this model is the presence of the noxious inflammatory process. Copyright 1999 European Federation of Chapter…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stimulation of the cingulum can precipitate self-mutilation.
“In contrast, stimulation of the cingulum can precipitate self-mutilation (Pellicer et al., 1999).”
From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Pellicer et al., 1999
Cites
Pain Affect Encoded in Human Anterior Cingulate But Not Somatosensory Cortex
Rainville, P., Duncan, G. H., Price, D. D., Carrier, B., & Bushnell, M. C. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5328.968 · Cited by 2,629 · see citing works
Analgesia produced by injection of lidocaine into the anterior cingulum bundle of the rat
Vaccarino, A. L., & Melzack, R. (1989) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(89)90008-0 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction
Bubb, E. J., Metzler-Baddeley, C., & Aggleton, J. P. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.05.008 · Cited by 740 · see citing works
“In contrast, stimulation of the cingulum can precipitate self-mutilation (Pellicer et al., 1999).”
Graff-Guerrero, A., González-Olvera, J., Fresán, A., Gómez-Martín, D., Carlos Méndez-Núñez, J., & Pellicer, F. (2005) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.05.002 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Pellicer, F., López‐Avila, A., & Torres‐López, E.
- Corresponding author
- Pellicer, Francisco
- ORCID
- Pellicer, Francisco
- Venue
- European Journal of Pain
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 287-293
- ISSN
- 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2149
- OpenAlex
- W1970282839
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
- Keywords
- autotomy, cingulum, electrical stimulation, hindpaw inflammation, carrageenan, pain facilitation, spinal cord
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review