Cited by 12Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and TreatmentVagus Nerve Stimulation Research

Electric stimulation of the cingulum bundle precipitates onset of autotomy induced by inflammation in rat

Pellicer, Francisco, López‐Avila, Alberto, Torres‐López, Edgar·1999·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to test if electric stimulation of the cingulum bundle in animals subjected to a hindpaw inflammatory process precipitates the onset and enhances autotomy behaviour. Wistar rats were implanted with bipolar parallel electrodes in the boundary of the cingulum bundle. The inflammatory process was induced in all subjects by injection of carrageenan. The groups were: A, sham; B, implanted and stimulated 10 min daily for 7 days; C, implanted and stimulated 2 h daily, for 7 days. Both groups were injected with CAR 2 days after ending the stimulation period; and D, implanted and stimulated 10 min daily for 5 days, the first stimulation being simultaneous to CAR injection. Results show that 100% of the subjects in stimulated groups presented autotomy as compared with 66% in the sham group. A significant shortening of the onset and increased rates in autotomy were observed in experimental groups (B, C and D) as compared to the sham group. We did not find differences between groups B and C, but there was an increment of autotomy in group D when compared with both B and C groups. We conclude that it is possible to facilitate the onset and to increase the intensity of the autotomy triggered by the inflammatory process with cingulum bundle electrical stimulation. The results also suggest that a fundamental condition to the development of the autotomy in this model is the presence of the noxious inflammatory process. Copyright 1999 European Federation of Chapter…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1090-3801(99)90056-3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stimulation of the cingulum can precipitate self-mutilation.

    “In contrast, stimulation of the cingulum can precipitate self-mutilation (Pellicer et al., 1999).”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Pellicer et al., 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pellicer, F., López‐Avila, A., & Torres‐López, E.
Corresponding author
Pellicer, Francisco
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-09
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
287-293
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W1970282839
Cited by
12
References
2
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Keywords
autotomy, cingulum, electrical stimulation, hindpaw inflammation, carrageenan, pain facilitation, spinal cord

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review