The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Paradoxes of public-sector managerialism, old public management and public service bargains
Abstract
This chapter considers three paradoxes or apparent contradictions in contemporary public management reform–paradoxes of globalization or internationalization, malade imaginaire (or successful failure) paradoxes, and paradoxes of half-hearted managerialism. It suggests that these three paradoxes can be explained by a comparative historical institutionalism linked to a motive-and-opportunity analysis of what makes some public service systems more susceptible to reform than others. It further argues that such explanations can be usefully linked together by exploring public service reform from the perspective of ‘public service bargains’ or PSBs (that is, explicit or implicit bargains between public servants and other actors in the society). Accordingly, it seeks to account for the three paradoxes of public management reform by looking at the effect of different PSB starting-points on reform experience, and at the way politician calculations over institutional arrangements could account for PSB shifts in some circumstances but not others.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1938) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 7,145
Bureaucracy and Representative Government
Niskanen, W. A. (1971) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,203
Kuper, L., & Horowitz, D. L. (1986) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2069338 · Cited by 4,869
The Politics of the Budgetary Process
Groves, H. M., & Wildavsky, A. (1965) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1055574 · Cited by 1,638
Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxes and Pendulums
AUCOIN, P. (1990) · Governance · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.1990.tb00111.x · Cited by 933
The New Public Management: Improving Research and Policy Dialogue
Barzelay, M. (2019) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520925274 · Cited by 678
Public Management and Administration
Hughes, O. E. (1998) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-26896-2 · Cited by 596
Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies.
Isaac, L., Aberbach, J. D., Putnam, R. D., & Rockman, B. A. (1983) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2068090 · Cited by 583
Moore, M. H. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 512
Regulations, Institutions, and Commitment: Comparative Studies of Telecommunications
(1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174589 · Cited by 467
Cited by
Garengo, P., & Sardi, A. (2021) · International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management · doi:10.1108/ijppm-03-2020-0102 · Cited by 50
Registered Nurses’ Patient Education in Everyday Primary Care Practice: Managers’ Discourses
Bergh, A.-L., Friberg, F., Persson, E., & Dahlborg-Lyckhage, E. (2015) · Global Qualitative Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/2333393615599168 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Hood, C.
- Venue
- International Public Management Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-22
- ISSN
- 1096-7494 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039777195
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 4.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Paradoxes of public-sector managerialism, old public management and public service bargains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1096-7494(00)00032-5
- The paper
- Hood, C. (2000). Paradoxes of public-sector managerialism, old public management and public service bargains. International Public Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1096-7494(00)00032-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.