Cited by 30Nursing education and managementNursing Roles and PracticesHealth Sciences Research and Education

Registered Nurses’ Patient Education in Everyday Primary Care Practice: Managers’ Discourses

Open access
Bergh, Anne-Louise, Friberg, Febe, Persson, Eva, Dahlborg-Lyckhage, Elisabeth·2015·Global Qualitative Nursing Research

Abstract

Nurses' patient education is important for building patients' knowledge, understanding, and preparedness for self-management. The aim of this study was to explore the conditions for nurses' patient education work by focusing on managers' discourses about patient education provided by nurses. In 2012, data were derived from three focus group interviews with primary care managers. Critical discourse analysis was used to analyze the transcribed interviews. The discursive practice comprised a discourse order of economic, medical, organizational, and didactic discourses. The economic discourse was the predominant one to which the organization had to adjust. The medical discourse was self-evident and unquestioned. Managers reorganized patient education routines and structures, generally due to economic constraints. Nurses' pedagogical competence development was unclear, and practice-based experiences of patient education were considered very important, whereas theoretical pedagogical knowledge was considered less important. Managers' support for nurses' practical- and theoretical-based pedagogical competence development needs to be strengthened.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2333393615599168

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nursing discharge education may be so integrated into other nursing care activities that it is not described or evaluated separately, unless motivated by standards determined by an external entity such as The Joint Commission, the QSEN institute, or a professional organization such as AWHONN.

    “Nursing discharge education may be so integrated into other nursing care activities (Bergh et al., 2015) that is not described or evaluated separately, unless motivated by standards determined by an external entity such as The Joint Commission (2019), the QSEN institute (2020) or a professional organization such as AWHONN (Suplee & Janke, 2020).”

    From Scoping Review of Postpartum Discharge Education Provided by Nurses (2022) · cites this paper as Bergh et al., 2015

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Berglund M. (2011). Taking charge of one’s life—Challenges for learning in long-term illness (Doctoral thesis). Växjö Linnaeus University, Sweden.
  2. SFS. (2003:460). Swedish Code of Statutes, number 460. Lag om etikprövning av forskning som avser människor [Act on ethical review of research involving humans. Revised 2008]. Retrieved from http://www.riksdagen.se/sv/Dokument-Lagar/Lagar/Svenskforfattningssamling/Lag-2003460-om-etikprovning_sfs-2003-460/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bergh, A.-L., Friberg, F., Persson, E., & Dahlborg-Lyckhage, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Borås (SE)
  • University of Stavanger (NO)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • University of West, Trollhättan, Sweden
Corresponding author
Bergh, Anne-Louise
Venue
Global Qualitative Nursing Research
Published
2015-01-01
Volume
2
Pages
2333393615599168-2333393615599168
ISSN
2333-3936 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130678278
Cited by
30
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Qualitative Nursing Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
patient education, registered nurses, primary care, primary care managers, economic discourse, medical discourse, organizational discourse, didactic discourse, self-management, nursing education, hands-on learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review