Cited by 4,465Climate change impacts on agricultureAgricultural Productivity and Crop ImprovementIrrigation Practices and Water Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 210 of the 216 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The DSSAT cropping system model

Jones, J.W, Hoogenboom, G, Porter, C.H, Boote, K.J, Batchelor, W.D, Hunt, L.A, Wilkens, P.W, Singh, U, Gijsman, A.J, Ritchie, J.T·2003·European Journal of Agronomy

DOI 10.1016/s1161-0301(02)00107-7

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The decision support system for agrotechnology transfer (DSSAT) has been in use for the last 15 years by researchers worldwide. This package incorporates models of 16 different crops with software that facilitates the evaluation and application of the crop models for different purposes. Over the last few years, it has become increasingly difficult to maintain the DSSAT crop models, partly due to fact that there were different sets of computer code for different crops with little attention to software design at the level of crop models themselves. Thus, the DSSAT crop models have been re-designed and programmed to facilitate more efficient incorporation of new scientific advances, applications, documentation and maintenance. The basis for the new DSSAT cropping system model (CSM) design is a modular structure in which components separate along scientific discipline lines and are structured to allow easy replacement or addition of modules. It has one Soil module, a Crop Template module which can simulate different crops by defining species input files, an interface to add individual crop models if they have the same design and interface, a Weather module, and a module for dealing with competition for light and water among the soil, plants, and atmosphere. It is also designed for incorporation into various application packages, ranging from those that help researchers adapt and test the CSM to those that operate the DSSAT-CSM to simulate production over time and space for different purposes. In this paper, we describe this new DSSAT-CSM design as well as approaches used to model the primary scientific components (soil, crop, weather, and management). In addition, the paper describes data requirements and methods used for model evaluation. We provide an overview of the hundreds of published studies in which the DSSAT crop models have been used for various applications. The benefits of the new, re-designed DSSAT-CSM will provide considerable opportunities to its developers and others in the scientific community for greater cooperation in interdisciplinary research and in the application of knowledge to solve problems at field, farm, and higher levels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1161-0301(02)00107-7

Cites

210 of 210 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., & Smith, M. (1998) · FAO eBooks · Cited by 20,540
On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters
Priestley, C. H. B., & Taylor, R. J. (1972) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100 · Cited by 6,545
Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover
Ritchie, J. T. (1972) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/wr008i005p01204 · Cited by 2,240
Self-citation
Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements
Doorenbos, J. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,226
Dynamics of C, N, P and S in grassland soils: a model
Parton, W. J., Stewart, J. W., & Cole, C. V. (1988) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/bf02180320 · Cited by 1,483
American Society of Agricultural Engineers Status changed from an Associated to an Affiliated Society, AAAS
Palmer, R. A. (1953) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.118.3075.3 · Cited by 1,354
Stochastic simulation of daily precipitation, temperature, and solar radiation
Richardson, C. W. (1981) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/wr017i001p00182 · Cited by 1,299
A Modeling Approach to Determining the Relationship Between Erosion and Soil Productivity
Williams, J. R., Jones, C., & Dyke, P. T. (1984) · Transactions of the ASAE · doi:10.13031/2013.32748 · Cited by 1,145
CERES-Maize: a simulation model of maize growth and development
Jones, C., Kiniry, J. R., & Dyke, P. T. (1986) · Cited by 1,109
APSIM: a novel software system for model development, model testing and simulation in agricultural systems research
McCown, R. L., Hammer, G., Hargreaves, J. N. G., Holzworth, D. P., & Freebairn, D. M. (1996) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/0308-521x(94)00055-v · Cited by 967

Show all 216 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

Boote, K.J., Bennett, J.M., Jones, J.W., Jowers, H.E., 1989. On-farm testing of peanut and soybean models in Florida. ASAE P No. 89-4040. Am. Soc. Agr. Engr. (ASAE), St. Joseph, MI, pp. 54.
Bowen, W.T., Jones, J.W., Thornton P.K., 1992. Crop simulation as a potential tool for evaluating sustainable land management. Utilization of Soil Survey Information for Sustainable Land Use Proceedings: 11–24 July.
Giraldo, 1998, Adaptation of the DSSAT model for simulation of Brachiaria decumbens production, Pasturas Tropicales, 20, 2
Hunkár, 1994, Validation of crop simulation model CERES-Maize, Quarterly Journal of Hungarian Meteorology Series, 98, 37
Jones J.W. Ritchie, J.T., 1991. Crop growth models In: Hoffman, G.J, Howell, T.A., Solomon, K.H. (Eds.), Management of Farm Irrigation Systems, American Society for Agricultural Engineering, pp. 63–89.
Jones, J.W., Boote, K.J., Hoogenboom, G., Jagtap, S.S., Wilkerson, G.G., 1989. SOYGRO V5.42, Soybean Crop Growth Simulation Model. User's Guide. Fl. Agric. Exp. Sta., Journal No. 8304. University of Florida, Gainesville. pp. 53.
Paz, 2001, Estimating potential economic return for variable rate management in soybeans, Trans. ASAE, 44, 1335
Singh, 1999, Soybean (Glycine max) yield prediction from current and historical weather data using CROPGRO model, Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 69, 639
Zalud, 2001, Estimation of winter wheat nitrogen stress using the CERES crop model, Rostlinna Vyroba, 47, 253

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 1,006

Land-Water-Food Nexus and indications of crop adjustment for water shortage solution
Ren, D., Yang, Y., Yang, Y., Richards, K., & Zhou, X. (2018) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.071 · Cited by 102
Effect of a participatory approach on the successful development of agricultural decision support systems: The case of Pigs2win
Meensel, J. V., Lauwers, L., Kempen, I., Dessein, J., & Huylenbroeck, G. V. (2012) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.002 · Cited by 101
Dynamic adaptation of maize and wheat production to climate change
Meza, F. J., & da Silva, D. P. G. (2009) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-009-9544-z · Cited by 101
Assessment of the agro-climatic indices to improve crop yield forecasting
Mathieu, J. A., & Aires, F. (2018) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.01.031 · Cited by 101
Implementation of a LoRaWAN Based Smart Agriculture Decision Support System for Optimum Crop Yield
Arshad, J., Aziz, M., Al‐Huqail, A. A., Zaman, M. H. U., Husnain, M., Rehman, A. U., & Shafiq, M. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14020827 · Cited by 101
Crop models and their use in assessing crop production and food security: A review
Rita, Y. L., Papalexiou, S. M., Li, Y., ELSHORBAGY, A. A., Li, Z., & Schuster‐Wallace, C. J. (2023) · Food and Energy Security · doi:10.1002/fes3.503 · Cited by 107
Nitrous oxide emissions from irrigated wheat in Australia: impact of irrigation management
Scheer, C., Grace, P., Rowlings, D. W., & Payero, J. O. (2012) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-012-1197-4 · Cited by 101
Modelling optimal crop sequences using network flows
Detlefsen, N., & Jensen, A. L. (2007) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2007.02.002 · Cited by 101
Looking into the future of agriculture in a changing climate
Iglesias, A., Quiroga, S., & Diz, A. (2011) · European Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/erae/jbr037 · Cited by 103
Performance of DSSAT-Nwheat across a wide range of current and future growing conditions
Kassie, B., Asseng, S., Porter, C., & Royce, F. (2016) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2016.08.012 · Cited by 97
Self-citation
Climate smart agriculture and global food-crop production
Pinto, A. D., Cenacchi, N., Kwon, H., Koo, J., & Dunston, S. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231764 · Cited by 114
Modelling, predicting and mapping the emergence of aflatoxins in cereals in the EU due to climate change
Battilani, P., Rossi, V., Giorni, P., Pietri, A., Gualla, A., van der Fels‐Klerx, H. J., Booij, C. J. H., Moretti, A., Logrieco, A. F., Miglietta, F., et al. (2012) · EFSA Supporting Publications · doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2012.en-223 · Cited by 100
Performance of the SUBSTOR-potato model across contrasting growing conditions
Raymundo, R., Asseng, S., Prassad, R., Kleinwechter, U., Concha, J., Condori, B., Bowen, W., Wolf, J., Olesen, J., Dong, Q., et al. (2017) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2016.04.012 · Cited by 98
Self-citation
Improvement of sugarcane yield estimation by assimilating UAV-derived plant height observations
Yu, D., Zha, Y., Shi, L., Jin, X., Hu, S., Yang, Q. L., Huang, K. J., & Zeng, W. (2020) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2020.126159 · Cited by 99
Quantifying potential benefits of drought and heat tolerance in rainy season sorghum for adapting to climate change
Singh, P., Nedumaran, S., Traoré, P., Boote, K. J., Rattunde, H. F. W., Prasad, P. V. V., Singh, N. P., Srinivas, K., & Bantilan, M. C. S. (2013) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.10.012 · Cited by 99
Self-citation
Evaluation of water-limited cropping systems in a semi-arid climate using DSSAT-CSM
Araya, A., Kisekka, I., Gowda, P. H., & Prasad, P. V. V. (2016) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2016.10.007 · Cited by 98
Impacts of rising temperature, carbon dioxide concentration and sea level on wheat production in North Nile delta
Kheir, A. M. S., Baroudy, A. A. E., Aiad, M. A., Zoghdan, M. G., Elaziz, M. A., Ali, M. G. M., & Fullen, M. A. (2018) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.209 · Cited by 97
A crop model cross calibration for use in regional climate impacts studies
Xiong, W., Holman, I. P., Conway, D., Lin, E., & Li, Y. (2008) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.01.005 · Cited by 98
Physiological mechanisms in plant growth models: do we need a supra‐cellular systems biology approach?
Poorter, H., Anten, N. P. R., & Marcelis, L. F. M. (2013) · Plant Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.12123 · Cited by 97
Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. 3. Relevance of APSIM to commercial crops
Carberry, P. S., Hochman, Z., Hunt, J. R., Dalgliesh, N. P., McCown, R. L., Whish, J. P. M., Robertson, M. J., Foale, M. A., Poulton, P. L., & van Rees, H. (2009) · Crop & Pasture Science · doi:10.1071/cp09052 · Cited by 97
Modeling salinity effect on rice growth and grain yield with ORYZA v3 and APSIM-Oryza
Radanielson, A. M., Gaydon, D. S., Li, T., Angeles, O. R., & Roth, C. H. (2018) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2018.01.015 · Cited by 95
Simulation‐Based Analysis of Effects of Vrn and Ppd Loci on Flowering in Wheat
White, J. W., Herndl, M., Hunt, L. A., Payne, T., & Hoogenboom, G. (2008) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2007.06.0318 · Cited by 97
Self-citation
Comparison of LARS-WG and AAFC-WG stochastic weather generators for diverse Canadian climates
Qian, B., Gameda, S., Hayhoe, H. N., Jong, R. D., & Bootsma, A. (2004) · Climate Research · doi:10.3354/cr026175 · Cited by 97
Correlation between temperature and phenology prediction error in rice (Oryza sativa L.)
van Oort, P. A. J., Zhang, T., de Vries, M. E., Heinemann, A. B., & Meinke, H. (2011) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.06.012 · Cited by 97
A comprehensively quantitative method of evaluating the impact of drought on crop yield using daily multi-scale SPEI and crop growth process model
Wang, Q., Wu, J., Li, X., Zhou, H., Yang, J., Geng, G., An, X., Liu, L., & Tang, Z. (2016) · International Journal of Biometeorology · doi:10.1007/s00484-016-1246-4 · Cited by 95
AquaCrop-OSPy: Bridging the gap between research and practice in crop-water modeling
Kelly, T. D., & Foster, T. (2021) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106976 · Cited by 96
Identifying irrigation and nitrogen best management practices for aerobic rice–maize cropping system for semi-arid tropics using CERES-rice and maize models
Kadiyala, M. D. M., Jones, J. W., Mylavarapu, R. S., Li, Y. C., & Reddy, M. D. (2014) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2014.10.019 · Cited by 96
Self-citation
Predicting Climate Change Impacts on Sugarcane Production at Sites in Australia, Brazil and South Africa Using the Canegro Model
Singels, A., Jones, M. R., Marin, F. R., Ruane, A. C., & Thorburn, P. J. (2013) · Sugar Tech · doi:10.1007/s12355-013-0274-1 · Cited by 96
Potential for a Rye Cover Crop to Reduce Nitrate Loss in Southwestern Minnesota
Feyereisen, G. W., Wilson, B., Sands, G. R., Strock, J. S., & Porter, P. M. (2006) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2005.0134 · Cited by 96
Identifying key entry-points for strategic management of smallholder farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa using the dynamic farm-scale simulation model NUANCES-FARMSIM
van Wijk, M. T., Tittonell, P. A., Rufino, M. C., Herrero, M., Pacini, C., de Ridder, N., & Giller, K. E. (2009) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2009.07.004 · Cited by 96
Development and Application of Process-based Simulation Models for Cotton Production: A Review of Past, Present, and Future Directions
Thorp, K. R., Ale, S., Bange, M. P., Barnes, E. M., Hoogenboom, G., Lascano, R. J., McCarthy, A. C., Nair, S., Paz, J. O., Rajan, N., et al. (2014) · Journal of Cotton Science · doi:10.56454/oovc6073 · Cited by 96
Self-citation
Crop planting date matters: Estimation methods and effect on future yields
Dobor, L., Barcza, Z., Hlásny, T., Árendás, T., Spitkó, T., & Fodor, N. (2016) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.03.023 · Cited by 95
Relay cropping as a sustainable approach: problems and opportunities for sustainable crop production
Tanveer, M., Anjum, S. A., Hussain, S., Cerdà, A., & Ashraf, U. (2017) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-017-8371-4 · Cited by 95
Modelling crops and cropping systems—Evolving purpose, practice and prospects
Keating, B. A., & Thorburn, P. J. (2018) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2018.04.007 · Cited by 104
Understanding and optimizing species mixtures using functional–structural plant modelling
Evers, J. B., van der Werf, W., Stomph, T. J., Bastiaans, L., & Anten, N. P. R. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ery288 · Cited by 97
Irrigation Scheduling for Agriculture in the United States: The Progress Made and the Path Forward
Taghvaeian, S., Andales, A. A., Allen, L., Kisekka, I., O’Shaughnessy, S. A., Porter, D., Sui, R., Irmak, S., Fulton, A. E., & Aguilar, J. (2020) · Transactions of the ASABE · doi:10.13031/trans.14110 · Cited by 95
Agronomic adaptation strategies under climate change for winter durum wheat and tomato in southern Italy: irrigation and nitrogen fertilization
Ventrella, D., Charfeddine, M., Moriondo, M., Rinaldi, M., & Bindi, M. (2011) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-011-0256-3 · Cited by 95
Using a Remote Sensing-Supported Hydro-Agroecological Model for Field-Scale Simulation of Heterogeneous Crop Growth and Yield: Application for Wheat in Central Europe
Hank, T., Bach, H., & Mauser, W. (2015) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs70403934 · Cited by 94
Do maize models capture the impacts of heat and drought stresses on yield? Using algorithm ensembles to identify successful approaches
Jin, Z., Zhuang, Q., Tan, Z., Dukes, J. S., Zheng, B., & Melillo, J. M. (2016) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13376 · Cited by 96
Regional and Global Land Data Assimilation Systems: Innovations, Challenges, and Prospects
Xia, Y., Hao, Z., Shi, C., Li, Y., Meng, J., Xu, T., Wu, X., & Zhang, B. (2019) · 气象学报：英文版 · doi:10.1007/s13351-019-8172-4 · Cited by 95
Exploring management strategies to improve maize yield and nitrogen use efficiency in northeast China using the DNDC and DSSAT models
Jiang, R., He, W., Zhou, W., Hou, Y., Yang, J. Y., & He, P. (2019) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2019.104988 · Cited by 94
Grand challenges for the 21st century: what crop models can and can't (yet) do
Silva, ‪. V., & Giller, K. E. (2020) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859621000150 · Cited by 103
Early season prediction of within-field crop yield variability by assimilating CubeSat data into a crop model
Ziliani, M. G., Altaf, M. U., Aragon, B., Houborg, R., Franz, T. E., Lu, Y., Sheffield, J., Hoteit, I., & McCabe, M. F. (2021) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108736 · Cited by 95
Modeling trade-offs among ecosystem services in agricultural production systems
Balbi, S., del Prado, A., Gallejones, P., Geevan, C. P., Pardo, G. O., Pérez-Miñana, E., Manrique, R., Hernández-Santiago, C., & Villa, F. (2015) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.12.017 · Cited by 93
The Role of Crop Systems Simulation in Agriculture and Environment
Boote, K. J., Jones, J. W., Hoogenboom, G., & White, J. W. (2010) · International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems · doi:10.4018/jaeis.2010101303 · Cited by 94
Self-citation
Quantifying Temperature Effects on Cotton Reproductive Efficiency and Fiber Quality
Lokhande, S. B., & Reddy, K. R. (2014) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj13.0531 · Cited by 99
Soybean-maize succession in Brazil: Impacts of sowing dates on climate variability, yields and economic profitability
Júnior, R. D. S. N., & Sentelhas, P. C. (2018) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2018.12.008 · Cited by 113
Practices for upscaling crop simulation models from field scale to large regions
Manivasagam, V. S., & Rozenstein, O. (2020) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2020.105554 · Cited by 93
Assessing the vulnerability and risk of maize to drought in China based on the AquaCrop model
Zhu, X., Xu, K., Liu, Y., Guo, R., & Chen, L. (2021) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2020.103040 · Cited by 96
Development, uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of the simple SALUS crop model in DSSAT
Dzotsi, K. A., Basso, B., & Jones, J. W. (2013) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.03.017 · Cited by 93
Self-citation
Effects of Estimating Soil Hydraulic Properties and Root Growth Factor on Soil Water Balance and Crop Production
Ma, L., Hoogenboom, G., Saseendran, S. A., Bartling, P. N. S., Ahuja, L. R., & Green, T. R. (2009) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2008.0206x · Cited by 93
Self-citation
Operational seasonal forecasting of crop performance
Stone, R. C., & Meinke, H. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1753 · Cited by 93
Application of the CSM-CERES-Rice model for evaluation of plant density and nitrogen management of fine transplanted rice for an irrigated semiarid environment
Ahmad, S., Ahmad, A., Soler, C. M. T., Ali, H., Zia‐Ul‐Haq, M., Anothai, J., Hussain, A., Hoogenboom, G., & Hasanuzzaman, M. (2011) · Precision Agriculture · doi:10.1007/s11119-011-9238-1 · Cited by 92
Self-citation
Structural approaches to modeling the impact of climate change and adaptation technologies on crop yields and food security
Islam, S., Cenacchi, N., Sulser, T. B., Gbegbelegbe, S., Hareau, G., Kleinwechter, U., Mason-D’Croz, D., Nedumaran, S., Robertson, R., Robinson, S., et al. (2016) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2016.08.003 · Cited by 92
Application of Crop Model Data Assimilation With a Particle Filter for Estimating Regional Winter Wheat Yields
Jiang, Z., Chen, Z., Chen, J., Liu, J., Ren, J., Li, Z., Sun, L., & Li, H. (2014) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2014.2316012 · Cited by 92
Modeling a wheat–maize double cropping system in China using two plant growth modules in RZWQM
Yu, Q., Saseendran, S. A., Ma, L., Flerchinger, G. N., Green, T. R., & Ahuja, L. R. (2006) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2005.10.009 · Cited by 92
Physiological and management factors contributing to soybean potential yield
Roekel, R. J. V., Purcell, L. C., & Salmerόn, M. (2015) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2015.05.018 · Cited by 98
Modelling cropping systems—highlights of the symposium and preface to the special issues
van Ittersum, M. K., & Donatelli, M. (2002) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s1161-0301(02)00095-3 · Cited by 92
Sugarcane model intercomparison: Structural differences and uncertainties under current and potential future climates
Marin, F. R., Thorburn, P. J., Nassif, D. S. P., & Costa, L. G. (2015) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.02.019 · Cited by 91
Global investigation of impacts of PET methods on simulating crop-water relations for maize
Liu, W., Yang, H., Folberth, C., Wang, X., Luo, Q., & Schulin, R. (2016) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.02.017 · Cited by 94
Simulated CSM-CROPGRO-cotton yield under projected future climate by SimCLIM for southern Punjab, Pakistan
Amin, A., Nasim, W., Mubeen, M., Ahmad, A., Nadeem, M., Urich, P., Fahad, S., Ahmad, S., Wajid, A., Tabassum, F., et al. (2017) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2017.05.010 · Cited by 94
Self-citation
Optimization of irrigation scheduling using ant colony algorithms and an advanced cropping system model
Nguyen, D. C. H., Ascough, J. C., Maier, H. R., Dandy, G. C., & Andales, A. A. (2017) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.07.002 · Cited by 91
Representing agriculture in E arth S ystem M odels: Approaches and priorities for development
McDermid, S., Mearns, L. O., & Ruane, A. C. (2017) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1002/2016ms000749 · Cited by 96
Improving maize growth processes in the community land model: Implementation and evaluation
Peng, B., Guan, K., Chen, M., Lawrence, D. M., POKHREL, Y. N., Suyker, A. E., Arkebauer, T. J., & Lü, Y. (2017) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.11.012 · Cited by 93
Crop model improvement in APSIM: Using wheat as a case study
Brown, H., Huth, N. I., & Holzworth, D. P. (2018) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2018.02.002 · Cited by 91
Field-scale soil moisture bridges the spatial-scale gap between drought monitoring and agricultural yields
Vergopolan, N., Xiong, S., Estes, L. D., Wanders, N., Chaney, N. W., Wood, E. F., Konar, M., Caylor, K. K., Beck, H. E., Gatti, N., et al. (2021) · Hydrology and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-25-1827-2021 · Cited by 96
Cyber-agricultural systems for crop breeding and sustainable production
Sarkar, S., Ganapathysubramanian, B., Singh, A., Fotouhi, F., Kar, S., Nagasubramanian, K., Chowdhary, G. V., Das, S. K., Kantor, G. A., Krishnamurthy, A., et al. (2023) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2023.08.001 · Cited by 91
Modeling Nitrogen and Water Management Effects in a Wheat‐Maize Double‐Cropping System
Fang, Q., Ma, L., Yu, Q., Malone, R. W., Saseendran, S. A., & Ahuja, L. R. (2008) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2007.0601 · Cited by 91
The impacts of increased heat stress events on wheat yield under climate change in China
Yang, X., Tian, Z., Sun, L., Chen, B., Tubiello, F. N., & Xu, Y. (2017) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-016-1866-z · Cited by 91
Development of a 10-km resolution global soil profile dataset for crop modeling applications
Han, E., Ines, A. V. M., & Koo, J. (2019) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.05.012 · Cited by 88
Global Response Patterns of Major Rainfed Crops to Adaptation by Maintaining Current Growing Periods and Irrigation
Minoli, S., Müller, C., Elliott, J. W., Ruane, A. C., Jägermeyr, J., Zabel, F., Dury, M., Folberth, C., François, L., Hank, T., et al. (2019) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1029/2018ef001130 · Cited by 98
Use of the APSIM model in long term simulation to support decision making regarding nitrogen management for pearl millet in the Sahel
Akponikpè, P. B. I., Gerard, B. G., Michels, K., & Bielders, C. L. (2009) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2009.09.005 · Cited by 90
East African food security as influenced by future climate change and land use change at local to regional scales
Moore, N. J., Alagarswamy, G., Pijanowski, B. C., Thornton, P. K., Lofgren, B. M., Olson, J., Andresen, J. A., Yanda, P. Z., & Qi, J. (2011) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0116-7 · Cited by 90
Simulating the Influence of Vernalization, Photoperiod and Optimum Temperature on Wheat Developmental Rates
McMaster, G. S., White, J. W., Hunt, L. A., Jamieson, P. D., Dhillon, S. S., & Ortiz‐Monasterio, I. (2008) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcn115 · Cited by 90
Self-citation
Optimizing the phosphorus use in cotton by using CSM-CROPGRO-cotton model for semi-arid climate of Vehari-Punjab, Pakistan
Amin, A., Nasim, W., Mubeen, M., Nadeem, M., Ali, L., Hammad, H. M., Sultana, S. R., Jabran, K., Rehman, M. H. U., Ahmad, S., et al. (2017) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-016-8311-8 · Cited by 90
Development of an irrigation scheduling software based on model predicted crop water stress
Gu, Z., Qi, Z., Ma, L., Dongwei, G. U. I., Xu, J., Fang, Q., Yuan, S., & Feng, G. G. (2017) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2017.10.023 · Cited by 89
Rational trade-offs between yield increase and fertilizer inputs are essential for sustainable intensification: A case study in wheat–maize cropping systems in China
Li, S., Lei, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, J., Shi, X., Jia, H., Wang, C., Chen, F., & Chu, Q. (2019) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.085 · Cited by 90
Enhancing Crop Yield Prediction Utilizing Machine Learning on Satellite-Based Vegetation Health Indices
Pham, H. T., Awange, J. L., Kühn, M., Nguyen, B. V., & Bui, L. K. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22030719 · Cited by 100
Integrating climate and satellite remote sensing data for predicting county-level wheat yield in China using machine learning methods
Zhou, W., Liu, Y., Ata-Ul-Karim, S. T., Ge, Q., Li, X., & Xiao, J. (2022) · International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2022.102861 · Cited by 94
Simulating Long-Term Impacts of Winter Rye Cover Crop on Hydrologic Cycling and Nitrogen Dynamics for a Corn-Soybean Crop System
Qi, Z., Helmers, M. J., Malone, R. W., & Thorp, K. R. (2011) · Transactions of the ASABE · doi:10.13031/2013.39836 · Cited by 89
Impacts of precipitation and temperature on crop yields in the Pampas
Verón, S. R., de Abelleyra, D., & Lobell, D. B. (2015) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1350-1 · Cited by 88
Climate changes affecting biotic interactions, phenology, and reproductive success in a savanna community over a 10-year period
Vilela, A. A., Claro, V. T. S. D., Torezan‐Silingardi, H. M., & Del‐Claro, K. (2017) · Arthropod-Plant Interactions · doi:10.1007/s11829-017-9572-y · Cited by 88
Climate change impacts on regional rice production in China
Lv, Z., Zhu, Y. P., Liu, X., Ye, H., Tian, Y., & Li, F. (2018) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-018-2151-0 · Cited by 88
A multi-scale and multi-model gridded framework for forecasting crop production, risk analysis, and climate change impact studies
Shelia, V., Hansen, J., Sharda, V., Porter, C. H., Aggarwal, P. K., Wilkerson, C. J., & Hoogenboom, G. (2019) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.02.006 · Cited by 87
Self-citation
Assessing the effects of precipitation and irrigation on winter wheat yield and water productivity in North China Plain
Zeng, R., Yao, F., Zhang, S., Yang, S., Bai, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2021) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107063 · Cited by 87
The NDICEA model, a tool to improve nitrogen use efficiency in cropping systems
van der Burgt, G. J. H. M., Oomen, G. J. M., Habets, A. S. J., & Rossing, W. A. H. (2006) · Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10705-006-9004-3 · Cited by 88
Winners and losers from climate change in agriculture: Insights from a case study in the Mediterranean basin
Dono, G., Cortignani, R., Dell’Unto, D., Deligios, P. A., Doro, L., Lacetera, N., Mula, L., Pasqui, M., Quaresima, S., Vitali, A., et al. (2016) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2016.05.013 · Cited by 87
Accounting for both parameter and model structure uncertainty in crop model predictions of phenology: A case study on rice
Wallach, D., Nissanka, S. P., Karunaratne, A. S., Weerakoon, W. M. W., Thorburn, P. J., Boote, K. J., & Jones, J. W. (2016) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2016.05.013 · Cited by 87
Self-citation
Assessing the impact of climate variability on maize using simulation modeling under semi-arid environment of Punjab, Pakistan
Ahmed, I., Rahman, M. H. U., Ahmed, S., Hussain, J., Ullah, A., & Judge, J. (2018) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-018-2884-3 · Cited by 91
Climate change and agriculture in the Sudan: Impact pathways beyond changes in mean rainfall and temperature
Siddig, K., Stepanyan, D., Wiebelt, M., Grethe, H., & Zhu, T. (2019) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106566 · Cited by 87
Improved nutrient management in cereals using Nutrient Expert and machine learning tools: Productivity, profitability and nutrient use efficiency
Timsina, J., Dutta, S. K., Devkota, K. P., Chakraborty, S., Neupane, R. K., Bista, S., Amgain, L. P., Singh, V. K., Islam, S., & Majumdar, K. (2021) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103181 · Cited by 91
Simple snow cover model for agrometeorological applications
Trnka, M., Kocmánková, E., Bálek, J., Eitzinger, J., Ruget, F., Formayer, H., Hlavinka, P., Schaumberger, A., Horáková, V., & Možný, M. (2010) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.04.012 · Cited by 87
Potential benefits of drought and heat tolerance in groundnut for adaptation to climate change in India and West Africa
Singh, P., Nedumaran, S., Ntare, B. R., Boote, K. J., Singh, N. P., Srinivas, K., & Bantilan, M. C. S. (2013) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-012-9446-7 · Cited by 87
Self-citation
Changes in extreme temperatures and their impacts on rice yields in southern China from 1981 to 2009
Zhang, S., Tao, F., & Zhang, Z. (2016) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2016.02.008 · Cited by 87
Parameterization-induced uncertainties and impacts of crop management harmonization in a global gridded crop model ensemble
Folberth, C., Elliott, J. W., Müller, C., Balkovič, J., Chryssanthacopoulos, J. P., Izaurralde, R. C., Jones, C. D., Khabarov, N., Liu, W., Reddy, A., et al. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221862 · Cited by 87
Comparison of three calibration methods for modeling rice phenology
Gao, Y., Wallach, D., Liu, B., Dingkuhn, M., Boote, K. J., Singh, U., Asseng, S., Kahveci, T., He, J., Zhang, R., et al. (2019) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107785 · Cited by 84
Self-citation
Agroecosystem services: A review of concepts, indicators, assessment methods and future research perspectives
Liu, Q., Sun, X. M., Wu, W., Liu, Z., Fang, G., & Yang, P. (2022) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109218 · Cited by 94
Variability in regional wheat yields as a function of climate, soil and economic variables: Assessing the risk of confounding
Bakker, M., Govers, G., Ewert, F. A., Rounsevell, M., & Jones, R. (2005) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2005.04.016 · Cited by 86
Simulating the effects of long-term discontinuous and continuous fertilization with straw return on crop yields and soil organic carbon dynamics using the DNDC model
Zhang, J., Hu, K., Li, K., Zheng, C., & Li, B. (2016) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2016.09.004 · Cited by 86
Statistical emulators of maize, rice, soybean and wheat yields from global gridded crop models
Blanc, É. (2017) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.12.022 · Cited by 86

Authors: Jones, J. W., Hoogenboom, G., Porter, C. H., Boote, K. J., Batchelor, W. D., Hunt, L. A., Wilkens, P. W., Singh, U., Gijsman, A. J., & Ritchie, J. T.
Affiliations: University of Florida (US)
University of Georgia (US)
Iowa State University (US)
University of Guelph (CA)
International Fertilizer Development Center (US)
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author: Jones, J.W
ORCID: Hoogenboom, G
Porter, C.H
Boote, K.J
Batchelor, W.D
Singh, U
Ritchie, J.T
Venue: European Journal of Agronomy
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2003-01
Volume: 18
Issue: 3-4
Pages: 235-265
ISSN: 1161-0301 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/s1161-0301(02)00107-7
OpenAlex: W2158883105
Cited by: 4,465
References: 216
Citations by year: 2026: 349 · 2025: 341 · 2024: 296 · 2023: 286 · 2022: 328 · 2021: 313 · 2020: 329 · 2019: 269 · 2018: 241 · 2017: 254 · 2016: 198 · 2015: 191 · 2014: 190 · 2013: 175 · 2012: 178
FWCI: 26.41
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: European Journal of Agronomy (publishedVersion)
European Journal of Agronomy
Topics: Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Climate change impacts on agriculture
Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Irrigation Practices and Water Management
Keywords: DSSAT, crop growth simulation, modular software design, soil model, model evaluation, agricultural technology transfer, crop yield simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The DSSAT cropping system model

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks