The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spatial and temporal distribution of the root system and root nutrient content of an established Miscanthus crop
Abstract
Although a high biomass yield is obtained from established Miscanthus crops, previous studies have shown that fertilizer requirements are relatively low. As little information on the role of the Miscanthus roots in nutrient acquisition is available, a study was conducted to gather data on the Miscanthus root system and root nutrient content. Therefore in 1992, the root distribution pattern of an established Miscanthus crop was measured in field trials using the trench profile and the auger methods. Also, in 1994/1995, seasonal changes in root length density (RLD) and root nutrient content were monitored three times during the vegetation period. The trench profile method showed that roots were present to the maximum depth measured of 250 cm. The top soil (0-30 cm contained 28% of root biomass, while nearly half of the total roots were present in soil layers deeper than 90 cm. Using the auger method, we found that RLD values in the topsoil decreased with increasing distance from the centre of the plants. Below 30 cm, RLD decreased markedly, and differences in root length in the soil between plants were less pronounced. The total root dry weight down to 180 cm tended to increase from May 1994 (10.6 t ha(-1)) to November 1994 (13.9 t ha(-1)) and then decreased again until March 1995 (11.5 t ha(-1)). Nutrient concentrations in the roots decreased with increasing depth. The concentrations of N (0.7-1.4%) and K (0.6-1.2%) were clearly higher than those of P (0.06-0.17%). The mean values for N, P and K contents of the roots of all three sampling dates in 1994/1995 were 109.2 kg N ha(-1), 10.6 kg P ha(-1) and 92.5 kg K ha(-1). Although our results showed that RLD values for Miscanthus in the topsoil are lower than for annual crops, the greater rooting depth and the higher RLD of Miscanthus in the subsoil mean that nutrient uptake from the subsoil is potentially greater. This enables Miscanthus crops to overcome periods of low nutrient (and water) availability especially during periods of rapid above-ground biomass growth.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Cmis mirrored the ground cover survey and below‐ground biomass found (with the spreading of Miscanthus into the outer Ce and Ci sampling positions) supporting the use of multiple coring positions when scaling up from small samples to Mg/ha (Neukirchen, Himken, Lammel, Czypionka‐Krause, & Olfs, 1999).”
From Measured and modelled effect of land‐use change from temperate grassland to Miscanthus on soil carbon stocks after 12 years (2019) · cites this paper as Neukirchen et al., 1999
In the citing paper
“Miscanthus and SRC have deeper roots (>2 m), than agricultural crops that enables them to use and deplete deeper groundwater resources, although this could be a disadvantage by affecting the local hydrological balance (Neukirchen et al., 1999;Crow & Houston, 2004).”
From Land‐use change to bioenergy production in Europe: implications for the greenhouse gas balance and soil carbon (2012) · cites this paper as Neukirchen et al., 1999
In the citing paper
“BGB is concentrated in the upper part of the profile [61]; in spite of large amounts of roots under M. giganteus observed down to 1 to 1.8 m [57, 61, 66, 80, 84], more than 50 % were in the top 30 cm.”
From Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out? (2015) · cites this paper as [84]
In the citing paper
“Due to differences in stand age, depth and sampling frequency inputs appear very variable [65, 66, 84].”
From Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out? (2015) · cites this paper as [84]
In the citing paper
“Root dry matter in the surface horizon is an order of magnitude larger than in the subsoil [31, 32, 80, 84].”
From Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out? (2015) · cites this paper as [84]
Citations
Cites
A Test of a Modified Line Intersect Method of Estimating Root Length
Tennant, D. (1975) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2258617 · Cited by 2,283
Methods of Studying Root Systems
Böhm, W. (1979) · Ecological studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-67282-8 · Cited by 2,034
A Method of Estimating the Total Length of Root in a Sample
Newman, E. I. (1966) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2401670 · Cited by 1,602
Fine root growth phenology, production, and turnover in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem
Burke, M. K., & Raynal, D. J. (1994) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/bf01416099 · Cited by 298
Development and Distribution of the Corn Root System Under Field Conditions1
Mengel, D., & Barber, S. A. (1974) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj1974.00021962006600030002x · Cited by 222
Himken, M., Lammel, J., Neukirchen, D., Czypionka-Krause, U., & Olfs, H.-W. (1997) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1004244614537 · Cited by 218
Self-citationRoot growth and nitrate utilization of maize cultivars under field conditions
Wiesler, F., & Horst, W. J. (1994) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/bf00007976 · Cited by 196
Analysis of the spatial variability of maize root density
Tardieu, F. (1988) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/bf02370555 · Cited by 154
Root turnover in a beech and a spruce stand of the Belgian Ardennes
van Praag, H. J., Sougnez-Remy, S., Weissen, F., & Carletti, G. (1988) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/bf02371146 · Cited by 151
Wurzelatlas mitteleuropäischer Ackerunkräuter und Kulturpflanzen
Kutschera, L. (1960) · Cited by 116
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Böhm, 1974, Wurzelforschung und Landschaftsökologie, Nat. Land., 49, 158
- Böhm, 1977, Comparative root investigations with two profile wall methods, Z. Acker- Pflanzenbau, 144, 297
- Funk, R., 1993. Einfluß der Beregnung und N-Düngung auf die Ertragsbildung und Qualitätsmerkmale von Topinambur, Arundo donax L. und Miscanthus sinensis Anderss. als möglicher Energie- und Zelluloserohstoff, Ph.D. thesis, University of Hohenheim.
- Geisler, 1975, Untersuchungen zur Bedeutung des Wurzelsystems von Kulturpflanzen. I. Der Einfluß des Bodenwassergehaltes und der Stickstoffdüngung auf Pflanzenwachstum, Wurzelmorphologie, Transpiration und Stickstoffaufnahme, Z. Acker- Pflanzenbau, 141, 211
- Greef, 1993, Syntaxonomy of Miscanthus×giganteus, Angew. Bot., 67, 87
- Holz, 1974, Die automatische Bestimmung des Stickstoffs als Indolphenolgrün in Böden und Pflanzen, Landwirtsch. Forsch., 26, 177
- Kayama, 1972, Studies on the relationship between Miscanthus sinensis community and soil. Part 3 Seasonal variation of production of Miscanthus sinensis grasslands and the soil conditions, Jpn. J. Ecol., 22, 151
- Köpke, 1981, A comparison of methods for measuring root growth of field crops, Z. Acker- Pflanzenbau, 150, 39
- Lewandowski, 1994, Einfluß von Bestandesdichte und Stickstoff- Düngung auf die Entwicklung, Nährstoffgehalte und Ertragsbildung von Miscanthus ‘Giganteus’, Mitt. Ges. Pflanzenbauwiss., 7, 341
- Midorikawa, 1975, Root production in seminatural grassland community dominated by Miscanthus sinensis in Kawatabi area, JIBP Synth., 13, 114
- Nygaard Nielsen, 1988, Produktiviteten af elefantengras Miscanthus sinensis ‘Giganteus’ pa farskellige jordtyper, Saertryk Tidsskrift Planteavl, 91, 275
- Raspe, 1989, Erfassung der Elementvorräte in der Wurzelbiomasse eines 100 jährigen Fichtenbestandes (Picea abies Karst.) im Schwarzwald, Angew. Bot., 63, 145
- Schwarz, 1993, Ertragsverlauf von Miscanthus sinensis ‘Giganteus’ auf zwei Ackerstandorten in Österreich, Bodenkultur, 44, 253
- Yano, 1975, Seasonal and yearly change of biomass and litter — Underground, JIBP Synth., 13, 147
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops
ANDERSON‐TEIXEIRA, K. J., DAVIS, S. C., MASTERS, M. D., & DELUCIA, E. H. (2009) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2008.01001.x · Cited by 391
Don, A., Osborne, B., Hastings, A., Skiba, U., Carter, M. S., Drewer, J., Flessa, H., Freibauer, A., Hyvönen, N., Jones, M. B., et al. (2012) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01116.x · Cited by 363
Heaton, E. A., Dohleman, F. G., Miguez, A. F., Juvik, J. A., Lozovaya, V., Widholm, J., Zabotina, O. A., McIsaac, G. F., David, M. B., Voigt, T. B., et al. (2010) · Advances in Botanical Research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-381518-7.00003-0 · Cited by 258
Nutrient requirements of Miscanthus x giganteus: Conclusions from a review of published studies
Cadoux, S., Riche, A. B., Yates, N. E., & Machet, J.-M. (2012) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.015 · Cited by 225
Soil carbon sequestration and land use change associated with biofuel production: empirical evidence
Qin, Z., Dunn, J. B., Kwon, H., Mueller, S., & Wander, M. M. (2016) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12237 · Cited by 208
Metadata
- Authors
- Neukirchen, D., Himken, M., Lammel, J., Czypionka-Krause, U., & Olfs, H.-W.
- Affiliations
- Norsk Hydro (Germany) (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Olfs, H.-W.
- ORCID
- Olfs, H.-W.
- Venue
- European Journal of Agronomy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 301-309
- ISSN
- 1161-0301 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2149904139
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 3.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Agronomy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
- Keywords
- Miscanthus, root systems, root length density, root nutrient content, root depth, seasonal variation, nutrient uptake, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, energy crops
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review