Cited by 258Bioenergy crop production and managementAgricultural Productivity and Crop ImprovementBiofuel production and bioconversion

Miscanthus

Heaton, Emily A., Dohleman, Frank G., Miguez, A. Fernando, Juvik, John A., Lozovaya, Vera, Widholm, Jack, Zabotina, Olga A., McIsaac, Gregory F. +4 more·2010·Advances in Botanical Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-381518-7.00003-0

Cites

197 of 197 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Miscanthus seems to be the best choice in terms of carbon sequestration and input efficiency due to its slow decay of residues and high belowground biomass.

    “Miscanthus seems to be the best choice in terms of C sequestration and input efficiency [23] due to its slow decay of residues and high BGB [13].”
  • Previous reviews on carbon sequestration under perennial energy crops include some unrelated to soil organic carbon, some without experimental evidence, and some focused on specific geographical regions.

    “Although there have been previous reviews on C sequestration under PECs [8–11], some of these were either unrelated to SOC [12, 13], or did not report any experimental evidence [1, 14, 15], or focused on specific geographical regions [16].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

9 of the 206 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heaton, E. A., Dohleman, F. G., Miguez, A. F., Juvik, J. A., Lozovaya, V., Widholm, J., Zabotina, O. A., McIsaac, G. F., David, M. B., Voigt, T. B., Boersma, N. N., & Long, S. P.
Affiliations
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Heaton, Emily A.
Venue
Advances in Botanical Research
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2010
Pages
75-137
ISSN
0065-2296 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2299520152
Cited by
258
References
206
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 16
FWCI
49.78
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in botanical research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
Keywords
Miscanthus × giganteus, C4 grasses, biomass feedstock, renewable fuels, crop productivity, crop breeding, water use efficiency, nitrogen utilization, nitrogen-fixing microorganisms, temperate crops

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review