The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences
Open accessAbstract
Increasing atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition may affect plant biodiversity, subsequently altering ecosystem stability. While a few studies have explored how simulated N deposition affects community stability and its underlying mechanisms, the experimental levels of N addition used are usually higher than current and future N deposition rates. Thus, their results could produce highly uncertain predictions of ecosystem function, especially if the responses to N deposition are nonlinear. We conducted a manipulative experiment that simulated elevated atmospheric N deposition with several N addition levels to evaluate the effect of N deposition on ecosystem stability and its underlying mechanisms in a semiarid grassland in northern China. Here we show that N addition altered community diversity, reducing species richness, evenness, diversity and dominance. In addition, we found that N addition at current N deposition levels had no significant impact on community stability. In contrast, N addition at levels from 4.6 to 13.8 g N m− 2 yr− 1 significantly decreased community stability, although community stability for the 13.8 g N m− 2 yr− 1 treatment was higher than that for the 4.6 g N m− 2 yr− 1 treatment. These results indicate that the response of community stability to N enrichment is nonlinear. This nonlinear change in community stability was positively correlated with species asynchrony, species richness, and species diversity as well as the stability of dominant species and the stability of the grass functional group. Our data suggest a need to re-evaluate the mechanisms responsible for the effects of N deposition on natural ecosystem stability across multiple levels of N enrichment and that additional experimentation with gradients of N loads more similar to future atmospheric N deposition rates is needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global negative effects of nitrogen deposition on soil microbes
Zhang, T., Chen, H. Y. H., & Ruan, H. (2018) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/s41396-018-0096-y · Cited by 707
Wang, C., Liu, D., & Bai, E. (2018) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.02.003 · Cited by 689
Walling, E., & Vaneeckhaute, C. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111211 · Cited by 408
Food management in tourism: Reducing tourism’s carbon ‘foodprint’
Gössling, S., Garrod, B., Aall, C., Hille, J., & Peeters, P. (2011) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2010.04.006 · Cited by 331
Management strategies for plant invasions: manipulating productivity, disturbance, and competition
Huston, M. A. (2004) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00083.x · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Venue
- Nature Sciences Sociétés
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 85-85
- ISSN
- 1240-1307 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4231385083
- Cited by
- 1,081
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1240-1307(97)87738-2
- The paper
- Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. (1997). Nature Sciences Sociétés. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1240-1307(97)87738-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.