Cited by 23Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and Education

Therapeutic inertia in type 2 diabetes: Insights from the PANORAMA study in France

Simon, D.·2012·Diabetes & Metabolism

Abstract

"Therapeutic inertia" is usually defined as the failure to change or uptitrate treatment strategy when a disease is uncontrolled. In patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) this may occur with antidiabetes treatments and/or treatment for various cardiovascular risk factors. The PANORAMA study (NCT00916513) compared individual HbA(1c) targets and actual HbA(1c) levels in 5817 patients with T2D in nine European countries, and investigated the reasons why therapeutic choices made by physicians sometimes differ from expert guidelines for this disease. Thus it provides an insight into therapeutic inertia, a fashionable paradigm which can be challenged. This article reports data specifically from the French cohort of patients (n=759). We will try to demonstrate that criticising physicians for not strictly applying the expert T2D guidelines would not be beneficial as the clinical background for this apparent therapeutic inertia is complex. It appears that it may be more clinically relevant and useful to understand the reasons why the therapeutic choice made by the physician-patient partnership can sometimes differ from guidelines. This pragmatic approach would not detract from the need to develop and implement expert guidelines as it is essential to have benchmarks to assess temporal trends of quality of healthcare delivered to patients with T2D at the national level. However, these treatment targets must be put into perspective for clinical practice. Following the Action to Control Car…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1262-3636(12)71534-3

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reasons for non-intensification include therapeutic failure, poor adherence to lifestyle modifications, poor compliance to medications, patient reluctance to intensify treatment, fear of side effects, poor self-monitoring, and cost.

    “Reasons for non-intensification include therapeutic failure, poor adherence to lifestyle modifications, poor compliance to medications, patient reluctance to intensify treatment, fear of side effects (such as hypoglycemia, gastrointestinal disturbance, oedema, or weight gain), poor self-monitoring, and cost [37].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simon, D.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Simon, D.
Venue
Diabetes & Metabolism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
38
Pages
S47-S52
ISSN
1262-3636 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035892655
Cited by
23
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
therapeutic inertia, type 2 diabetes, HbA1c targets, treatment intensification, physician adherence to guidelines, physician-patient partnership, diabetes treatment, cardiovascular risk factors, diabetes care quality, French patients, ACCORD trial, glycemic control, temporal trends in care
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Blood Glucose, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Angiopathies, Drug Administration Schedule, Europe, Female, France, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Guideline Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review