The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The single aliquot regenerative dose protocol: potential for improvements in reliability
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The recycling ratio was 1.00 ± 0.05 in the dose reproducibility test.
“A test for dose reproducibility was also performed following procedures of (36) with the initial and final regenerative dose of 4.2 Gy (fig. S2), with the resultant recycling ratio of 1.00 ± 0.05.”
From Pre-Clovis projectile points at the Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas—Implications for the Late Pleistocene peopling of the Americas (2018) · cites this paper as [36]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Bailey, 1997, Partial bleaching and the decay form characteristics of quartz OSL, Radiat. Meas., 27, 123, 10.1016/S1350-4487(96)00157-6 · DOI
- Banerjee, 2000, Retrospective dosimetry, Appl. Radiat. Isot., 52, 831, 10.1016/S0969-8043(99)00247-X · DOI
- Banerjee, 2001, Equivalent dose estimation using a single aliquot of polymineral fine grains, Radiat. Meas., 33, 73, 10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00101-3 · DOI
- Choi, 2003, Luminescence dating of well-sorted marine terrace sediments on the southeastern coast of Korea, Quat. Sci. Rev., 22, 407, 10.1016/S0277-3791(02)00136-1 · DOI
- Folz, 1999, A single-aliquot OSL protocol using bracketing regenerative doses to accurately determine equivalent doses in quartz, Radiat. Meas., 30, 477, 10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00046-3 · DOI
- Jain, M., Murray, A.S., Bøtter-Jensen, L., 2003. Characterisation of blue-light stimulated luminescence components in different quartz samples: implications for dose measurement. Radiat. Meas. · DOI
- Murray, 2002, Precision and accuracy in the optically stimulated luminescence dating of sedimentary quartz, Geochronometria, 21, 1
- Murray, 1998, Measurement of the equivalent dose in quartz using a regenerative-dose single-aliquot protocol, Radiat. Meas., 29, 503, 10.1016/S1350-4487(98)00044-4 · DOI
- Murray, 1998, Factors controlling the shape of the OSL decay curve in quartz, Radiat. Meas., 29, 65, 10.1016/S1350-4487(97)00207-2 · DOI
- Murray, 2000, Luminescence dating of quartz using an improved single-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol, Radiat. Meas., 32, 57, 10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00253-X · DOI
- Murray, 2000, Application of the single-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol to the 375°C quartz TL signal, Radiat. Meas., 32, 579, 10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00089-5 · DOI
- Murray, 2002, Dose estimation using quartz OSL in the non-linear region of the growth curve, Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 101, 371, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006004 · DOI
- Roberts, 2001, Equivalent dose determinations for polymineralic fine-grains using the SAR protocol, Quat. Sci. Rev., 20, 859, 10.1016/S0277-3791(00)00051-2 · DOI
- Roberts, 1999, Optical dating of single and multiple grains of quartz from Jinmium rock shelter, northern Australia, Archaeometry, 41, 365, 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1999.tb00988.x · DOI
- Singarayer, J.S., Bailey, R.M., 2003. Component-resolved bleaching spectra of quartz optically stimulated luminescence: preliminary results and implications for dating. Radiat. Meas., submitted for publication. · DOI
- Stokes, 2000, Investigations of the performance of quartz single aliquot DE determination procedures, Radiat. Meas., 32, 585, 10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00073-1 · DOI
- Thomsen, 2002, Household and workplace chemicals as retrospective luminescence dosemeters, Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 101, 515, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006039 · DOI
- Turney, 2001, Early human occupation at Devil's Lair, southwestern Australia 50,000 years ago, Quat. Res., 55, 3, 10.1006/qres.2000.2195 · DOI
- Wallinga, 2000, Underestimation of equivalent dose in single-aliquot optical dating of feldspars caused by preheating, Radiat. Meas., 32, 691, 10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00127-X · DOI
- Wintle, 2000, Quartz OSL, Radiat. Meas., 32, 387, 10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00057-3 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
New Archaeological Evidence for an Early Human Presence at Monte Verde, Chile
Dillehay, T. D., Ocampo, C., Saavedra, J., Sawakuchi, A. O., Vega, R. M., Pino, M., Collins, M. B., Scott Cummings, L., Arregui, I., Villagran, X. S., et al. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141923 · Cited by 307
“The luminescence dating of the Monte Verde sediments was based on the Single-Aliquot Regenerative (SAR) dose protocol [40] (see Text G in S1 File) applied to concentrates of quartz and K-rich feldspar in the 180–250 μm grain size.”
MethodThe Buttermilk Creek Complex and the origins of Clovis at the Debra L. Friedkin Site, Texas
Waters, M. R., Forman, S. L., Jennings, T. A., Nordt, L. C., Driese, S. G., Feinberg, J. M., Keene, J. L., Halligan, J., Lindquist, A., Pierson, J., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1201855 · Cited by 229
Boëda, E., Clemente-Conte, I., Fontugne, M., Lahaye, C., Pino, M., Felice, G. D., Guidon, N., Hoeltz, S., Lourdeau, A., Pagli, M., et al. (2014) · Antiquity · doi:10.1017/s0003598x00050845 · Cited by 128
Human occupation in South America by 20,000 BC: The Toca da Tira Peia site, Piauí, Brazil
Lahaye, C., Hernandez, M., Boëda, E., Felice, G. D., Guidon, N., Hoeltz, S., Lourdeau, A., Pagli, M., Pessis, A.-M., Rasse, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2013.02.019 · Cited by 124
Waters, M. R., Keene, J. L., Forman, S. L., Prewitt, E. R., Carlson, D. L., & Wiederhold, J. E. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat4505 · Cited by 115
Luminescence dating of soil archives
Wallinga, J., Sevink, J., van Mourik, J. M., & Reimann, T. (2019) · Developments in Quaternary Sciences · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-64108-3.00004-5 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Murray, A. S., & Wintle, A. G.
- Venue
- Radiation Measurements
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4-5
- Pages
- 377-381
- ISSN
- 1350-4487
- Cited by
- 1,983
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review