Cited by 139Corneal surgery and disordersCorneal Surgery and TreatmentsOcular Surface and Contact Lens

The use of X-ray scattering techniques to determine corneal ultrastructure

Meek, Keith M, Quantock, Andrew J·2001·Progress in Retinal and Eye Research

Abstract

The manner in which X-rays are scattered or diffracted by the cornea provides us with valuable insights into the fine structure of the corneal stroma. This is because when X-rays pass through a cornea a diffraction pattern is formed due to scattering from regularly arranged collagen molecules and fibrils that comprise the bulk of the stromal matrix. Collagen provides the cornea with most of its strength, and its proper organisation is believed to be important for tissue transparency. Ever since 1978, when the first X-ray diffraction patterns were obtained from the cornea using radiation from a powerful synchrotron source, biophysicists have recorded and analysed a huge number of X-ray diffraction patterns from many different corneas. This article aims to explain the ideas that underpin our use of X-ray diffraction to investigate corneal ultrastructure, and show how the knowledge gained to date has far-reaching implications for tissue biomechanics, disease changes and transparency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1350-9462(00)00016-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When X-rays pass through the cornea, measuring the angles of the diffracted beams allows the fibril separation to be calculated.

    “This is the case, for example, when X-rays (electromagnetic waves characterised by short wavelengths and invisible to the naked eye) pass through the cornea, and by measuring the angles of these so-called diffracted beams, the fibril separation can be calculated (Meek and Quantock, 2001).”

    From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as Meek and Quantock, 2001

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meek, K. M., & Quantock, A. J.
Affiliations
Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
Meek, Keith M
Venue
Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-01
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
95-137
ISSN
1350-9462 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083803155
Cited by
139
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in Retinal and Eye Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal Surgery and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Keywords
corneal ultrastructure, corneal stroma, X-ray diffraction, collagen fibrils, corneal transparency, corneal biomechanics, corneal disease, synchrotron radiation
MeSH terms
Animals, Collagen, Cornea, Corneal Diseases, Humans, Proteoglycans, X-Ray Diffraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review