Cited by 55Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsBioenergy crop production and managementAgricultural Science and Fertilization

N2O emission from energy crop fields of Miscanthus “Giganteus” and winter rye

Jørgensen, Rasmus N., Jørgensen, Bodil J., Nielsen, Niels E., Maag, Michael, Lind, Anne-M.·1997·Atmospheric Environment

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1352-2310(97)00128-3

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Perennial dedicated energy crops showed significantly lower N2O emissions than conventional energy crops except for Hornum, the Danish site, which is characterized by a short measurement period that was restricted to one vegetation period.

    “Perennial dedicated energy crops showed significantly lower N 2 O emissions than conventional energy crops except for Hornum, the Danish site, which is characterized by a short measurement period that was restricted to one vegetation period (Jørgensen et al., 1997).”
  • The larger emissions from Miscanthus compared with the adjacent winter rye at the Hornum, Denmark site may be related to reduced aeration and a higher soil water content, thought mainly due to accumulation of Miscanthus litter.

    “The larger emissions from Miscanthus compared with the adjacent winter rye at the Hornum, Denmark site (Fig. 2a) may be related to reduced aeration and a higher soil water content, which is thought to be mainly due to accumulation of Miscanthus litter (Jørgensen et al., 1997).”
  • Experimental evidence for directly measured greenhouse gas emissions was found in 12 papers from eight different experiments, mainly on nitrous oxide from Miscanthus, switchgrass, short-rotation coppice willow and/or short-rotation coppice poplar, mainly following arable but some also after grassland.

    “Experimental evidence for directly measured GHG emissions was found in 12 papers from eight different experiments, mainly on nitrous oxide (N2O) from Miscanthus [48–51], switchgrass [52, 53], SRC willow and/or SRC poplar, mainly following arable [48, 49, 54] but some also after grassland [55, 56].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jørgensen, R. N., Jørgensen, B. J., Nielsen, N. E., Maag, M., & Lind, A.-M.
Affiliations
Danish Cattle Research Centre (DK)
Venue
Atmospheric Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-09
Volume
31
Issue
18
Pages
2899-2904
ISSN
1352-2310 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114695257
Cited by
55
References
25
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Atmospheric Environment (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
Keywords
nitrous oxide emissions, energy crops, Miscanthus × giganteus, winter rye, nitrogen fertilization, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, soil N2O flux, seasonal emission patterns, sandy loam soil, ammonium nitrate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review