The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A review and synthesis of monoterpene speciation from forests in the United States
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The monoterpene composition (emission and tissue internal concentration) of major forest tree species in the United States is discussed. Of the 14 most commonly occurring compounds ( α -pinene, β -pinene, Δ 3 -carene, d -limonene, camphene, myrcene, α -terpinene, β -phellandrene, sabinene, ρ -cymene, ocimene, α -thujene, terpinolene, and γ -terpinene), the first six are usually found to be most abundant. Expected regional variability based on the monoterpene composition fingerprints and corresponding tree species distribution and abundance is examined. In the southeast, α -pinene and β -pinene seem to dominate monoterpene emissions, while in the northern forests emissions are distributed more evenly among the six major compounds. In some parts of western forests, β -pinene and Δ 3 -carene can be more abundant than α -pinene. Among the other eight compounds, β -phellandrene and sabinene occasionally are significant percentages of expected local monoterpene emissions. Ocimene and ρ -cymene are estimated to be more common in regions dominated by deciduous broadleaf forests, although total emission rates are generally lower for these forests relative to those dominated by conifers. These percentages are compared with monoterpene composition measured in ambient air at various sites. Estimated monoterpene emission composition based on local forest species composition agrees fairly well with ambient measurements for the six major compounds. The past assumption that α -pinene composes approximately 50% of total monoterpene emissions appears reasonable for many areas, except for possibly the northern coniferous forests and some areas in the west dominated by true firs, spruce, and western pines (lodgepole and ponderosa pines). The oxygenated monoterpenes such as camphor, bornyl acetate, and cineole often compose high percentages of the monoterpenes within plant tissues, but are much less abundant in emission samples. Even after adjusting for lower vapor pressures of these compounds, emission rates relative to the hydrocarbon monoterpenes are often lower than would be expected from their internal concentrations. More study is warranted on monoterpene emission rates and composition, especially from the spruces, true firs, hemlocks, cedars, and some deciduous species such as the maples. Non-invasive canopy level and whole ecosystem flux studies are also needed to establish uncertainty estimates for monoterpene emission models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Speciation of Gas-Phase and Fine Particle Emissions from Burning of Foliar Fuels
Hays, M. D., Geron, C. D., Linna, K. J., Smith, N. D., & Schauer, J. J. (2002) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0111683 · Cited by 398
Self-citationTherapeutic Potential of Volatile Terpenes and Terpenoids from Forests for Inflammatory Diseases
Kim, T., Song, B., Cho, K. S., & Lee, I.-S. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21062187 · Cited by 281
Fry, J. L., Draper, D. C., Barsanti, K. C., Smith, J. N., Ortega, J., Winkler, P. M., Lawler, M. J., Brown, S. S., Edwards, P. M., Cohen, R. C., et al. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es502204x · Cited by 262
Lu, S., Xu, R., Jia, J.-W., Pang, J., Matsuda, S. P. T., & Chen, X.-Y. (2002) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.006544 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Geron, C., Rasmussen, R., R. Arnts, R., & Guenther, A.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1761-1781
- ISSN
- 1352-2310 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2076062929
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review and synthesis of monoterpene speciation from forests in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00364-7
- The paper
- Geron, C., Rasmussen, R., R. Arnts, R., & Guenther, A. (2000). A review and synthesis of monoterpene speciation from forests in the United States. Atmospheric Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00364-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.