Cited by 286Philosophy and History of ScienceLiterary, Cultural, Historical AnalysisEpistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

Determinism and Chance

Loewer, Barry·2001·Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1355-2198(01)00028-4

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loewer, B.
Corresponding author
Loewer, Barry
Venue
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-12
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
609-620
ISSN
1355-2198 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088361518
Cited by
286
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
83.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Literary, Cultural, Historical Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Keywords
objective chance, determinism, statistical mechanics, laws of nature, David Lewis, thermodynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review