PreprintCited by 21Philosophy and History of SciencePhilosophy, Science, and HistoryPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

The Past Hypothesis and the Nature of Physical Laws

Open access
Chen, Eddy Keming·2020·arXiv

Abstract

If the Past Hypothesis underlies the arrows of time, what is the status of the Past Hypothesis? In this paper, I examine the role of the Past Hypothesis in the Boltzmannian account and defend the view that the Past Hypothesis is a candidate fundamental law of nature. Such a view is known to be compatible with Humeanism about laws, but as I argue it is also supported by a minimal non-Humean "governing" view. Some worries arise from the non-dynamical and time-dependent character of the Past Hypothesis as a boundary condition, the intrinsic vagueness in its specification, and the nature of the initial probability distribution. I show that these worries do not have much force, and in any case they become less relevant in a new quantum framework for analyzing time's arrows -- the Wentaculus. Hence, the view that the Past Hypothesis is a candidate fundamental law should be more widely accepted than it is now.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2008.00611

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If it is plausible that PH is a candidate fundamental law, then the metaphysical account of laws should make room for a boundary condition to be a fundamental law.

    “If it is plausible that PH is a candidate fundamental law (Chen, 2020), then the metaphysical account of laws should make room for a boundary condition to be a fundamental law.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

14 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, E. K.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Chen, Eddy Keming
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Pages
204-248
OpenAlex
W3046408898
Cited by
14
References
72
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
26.75
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Harvard University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh) (submittedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
University of California, San Diego
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
Past Hypothesis, arrow of time, fundamental laws of nature, boundary conditions, statistical mechanics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review