The Past Hypothesis and the Nature of Physical Laws
Open accessAbstract
If the Past Hypothesis underlies the arrows of time, what is the status of the Past Hypothesis? In this paper, I examine the role of the Past Hypothesis in the Boltzmannian account and defend the view that the Past Hypothesis is a candidate fundamental law of nature. Such a view is known to be compatible with Humeanism about laws, but as I argue it is also supported by a minimal non-Humean "governing" view. Some worries arise from the non-dynamical and time-dependent character of the Past Hypothesis as a boundary condition, the intrinsic vagueness in its specification, and the nature of the initial probability distribution. I show that these worries do not have much force, and in any case they become less relevant in a new quantum framework for analyzing time's arrows -- the Wentaculus. Hence, the view that the Past Hypothesis is a candidate fundamental law should be more widely accepted than it is now.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If it is plausible that PH is a candidate fundamental law, then the metaphysical account of laws should make room for a boundary condition to be a fundamental law.
“If it is plausible that PH is a candidate fundamental law (Chen, 2020), then the metaphysical account of laws should make room for a boundary condition to be a fundamental law.”
From Governing Without A Fundamental Direction of Time: Minimal Primitivism about Laws of Nature (2022) · cites this paper as Chen, 2020
Cites
New work for a theory of universals
Lewis, D. (1983) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048408312341131 · Cited by 3,140 · cited 1× · see citing works
“ther PH can count as a fundamental Lewisian law and whether SP can count as objective probabilities on the best-system account. Anticipating the need to add a boundary condition into the best system, Lewis (1983) writes, A law is any regularity that earns inclusion in the ideal system. (Or, in case of ties, in every i…”
BackgroundThe mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics
Edwards, D. A. (1979) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/bf00413704 · Cited by 2,685 · see citing works
Counterfactual Dependence and Time's Arrow
Lewis, D. (1979) · Noûs · doi:10.2307/2215339 · Cited by 1,514 · see citing works
The Metaphysics Within Physics
Maudlin, T. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199218219.001.0001 · Cited by 1,293 · cited 3× · see citing works
“s of non-Humean theories: 1.Primitivism: fundamental laws are primitive facts in the world. 2. Reductionism: fundamental laws are analyzed in terms of something outside the mosaic. Carroll (1994) and Maudlin (2007) maintain primitivist versions of non-Humeanism. Hildebrand (2013) provides a survey of the reductionist…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPenrose, O. (1962) · doi:10.1088/0370-1328/79/3/318 · Cited by 1,160 · cited 1×
“hese ideas can be found in (Albert 2000, 2012) and (Loewer 2007), and they are also discussed in (Frisch 2005, 2007), (Demarest 2019), (Fernandes, this volume), (Callender 2004), (Horwich 1987), and (Reichenbach 1956). The records arrow. We have photographs and videos of WWII but no photographs of the next major world…”
BackgroundTHE USE OF BEHAVIOURAL LANGUAGE TO REFER TO MECHANICAL PROCESSES*
MacKay, D. (1962) · British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/xiii.50.89 · Cited by 992 · cited 1×
“3For more on the notion of typicality and its application in statistical mechanics, see (Goldstein 2012), (Lazarovici & Reichert 2015), and (Wilhelm 2019). degrees of freedom are in a special state, providing a sense that the total state of the early universe has low entropy.”
BackgroundBoltzmann, L., Brush, S., & Balàzs, N. (1964) · doi:10.1063/1.3051862 · Cited by 954 · cited 3×
“states of higher entropy in the future direction. But there is nothing earlier than t 0, as it is stipulated to be the initial time, say, the time of the Big Bang.12 11Boltzmann’s original H-theorem (Boltzmann 1964)[1898] is an attempt to show this. Lanford (1975) produces an exact result for a simple system of hard s…”
BackgroundInfluentialTHE EMPEROR'S NEW MIND Concerning Computers, Minds and the Laws of Physics
Sloman, A. (1992) · doi:10.1112/blms/24.1.87 · Cited by 891
Dingle, H. (1944) · Nature · doi:10.1038/153758a0 · Cited by 800 · cited 1×
“sh between two types of non-Humean theories: 1.Primitivism: fundamental laws are primitive facts in the world. 2. Reductionism: fundamental laws are analyzed in terms of something outside the mosaic. Carroll (1994) and Maudlin (2007) maintain primitivist versions of non-Humeanism. Hildebrand (2013) provides a survey o…”
BackgroundThe Nature of the Physical World
Whittaker, E. T. (n.d.) · Nature · doi:10.1038/123004a0 · Cited by 676 · cited 1×
“ial conditions, and for each entropic trajectory there can be short-lived, shallow, and infrequent decreases of entropy (see Second Laws for X and for ). Recognizing the importance of the Second Law, Eddington (1928) suggests: If someone points out to you that your pet theory of the universe is in disagreement with Ma…”
BackgroundKenyon, F. (1943) · Nature · doi:10.1038/152673a0 · Cited by 610 · cited 5×
“lar time and physical systems (e.g. dinosaurs) that exist at an earlier time, but no strong correlations between physical records and events at a later time. The Past Hypothesis oers an explanation. Albert (2000) suggests that a record is a relation between two temporal ends of a physical process. A record enables us…”
BackgroundInfluentialTime evolution of large classical systems
Lanford, O. E. (1975) · Lecture Notes in Physics · doi:10.1007/3-540-07171-7_1 · Cited by 557 · cited 1× · see citing works
“But there is nothing earlier than t 0, as it is stipulated to be the initial time, say, the time of the Big Bang.12 11Boltzmann’s original H-theorem (Boltzmann 1964)[1898] is an attempt to show this. Lanford (1975) produces an exact result for a simple system of hard spheres where the Boltzmann equation is shown to be…”
BackgroundThe emergent multiverse: quantum theory according to the Everett interpretation
Wallace, D. (2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-3911 · Cited by 428 · cited 1× · see citing works
“sense: we have to give up the expectation that experimental outcomes are unique and determinate. Instead, our experiences are to be understood as experiences of agents in an emergent multiverse (see (Wallace 2012)). Second, in the Bohmian version, in addition to the wave function that evolves unitarily according to th…”
BackgroundMukunda, N. (2018) · doi:10.18520/cs/v114/i07/1554-1555 · Cited by 409 · cited 2×
“7 3 Why the Past Hypothesis is Law-Like It is clear that PH has a special status in the Boltzmannian account. It has been suggested that PH is like a law of nature. For example, this is emphasized by Feynman (2017)[1965] as quoted in the epigraph. Making a similar point about classical statistical mechanics, Goldstein…”
BackgroundInfluentialElementary Quantum Metaphysics
Albert, D. Z. (1996) · Boston studies in the philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-8715-0_19 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Loewer, B. (2012) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-012-9911-x · Cited by 324 · cited 1× · see citing works
“explanatory success of the Boltzmannian account, which is assumed in this paper. It is clear that PH is not a law of mathematics. 19This is di erent from the notion of metaphysical explanation. See (Loewer 2012), (Hicks & van Elswyk 2015). On some views, a fundamental law of nature is metaphysically explained (but…”
BackgroundLoewer, B. (2001) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics · doi:10.1016/s1355-2198(01)00028-4 · Cited by 286 · cited 2× · see citing works
“beyond subjective credences? (In so far as typicality plays a similar explanatory role as probability, TP may face the same prima facie problem as SP.) Humeanism has resources to solve this problem. Loewer (2001) suggests that deterministic“chances”cangainentryintheLewsianbestsystembytheinformativeness 29 they bring a…”
BackgroundFrom Eternity to Here: The Quest for the Ultimate Theory of Time
Albrecht, A. (2010) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3397046 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Physics meets philosophy at the Planck scale: Index
Callender, C., & Huggett, N. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612909 · Cited by 256 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Nomological interpretation: on this view, the fundamental space is the physical space(time) and the fundamental ontology consists in particles, fields, or flashes on that space; the wave function represents a physical law (Dürr et al. 1996), (Goldstein & Teufel 2001) and (Goldstein & Zanghì 2013).”
BackgroundQuantum Mechanics on Spacetime I: Spacetime State Realism
Wallace, D., & Timpson, C. (2009) · British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/axq010 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Boltzmann’s Approach to Statistical Mechanics
Goldstein, S. (2001) · Lecture Notes in Physics · doi:10.1007/3-540-44966-3_3 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time
Kutach, D., & Press, C. (2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-1389 · Cited by 202 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For recent discussions, see (Albert 2000), (Goldstein 2001), (Callender 2004, 2011), (Lebowitz 2008), (North 2011), (Loewer 2020), and (Goldstein et al. 2020).”
The “Past Hypothesis”: Not even false
Earman, J. (2006) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics · doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2006.03.002 · Cited by 176 · cited 1× · see citing works
“nd not completely rigorous (Frigg 2007). Second, some criticize the answer to the Hard Part, such as the charge that PH is not even false because the entropy of the early universe is not well-defined (Earman 2006), the charge that PH is not sucient to explain the thermodynamic behaviors of subsystems (Winsberg 2004), a…”
BackgroundBohmian Mechanics and the Meaning of the Wave FunctionPreprint
Dürr, D., Zanghí, N., & Goldstein, S. (1995) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9512031 · Cited by 148 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Nomological interpretation: on this view, the fundamental space is the physical space(time) and the fundamental ontology consists in particles, fields, or flashes on that space; the wave function represents a physical law (Dürr et al. 1996), (Goldstein & Teufel 2001) and (Goldstein & Zanghì 2013).”
BackgroundAsymmetries in Time: Problems in the Philosophy of Science
Loizou, A. (1991) · doi:10.5840/intstudphil199123125 · Cited by 138
Reality and the Role of the Wavefunction in Quantum Theory
Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., & Zanghí, N. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30690-7_12 · Cited by 137 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Nomological interpretation: on this view, the fundamental space is the physical space(time) and the fundamental ontology consists in particles, fields, or flashes on that space; the wave function represents a physical law (Dürr et al. 1996), (Goldstein & Teufel 2001) and (Goldstein & Zanghì 2013).”
BackgroundApproach to thermal equilibrium of macroscopic quantum systems.
Goldstein, S., Lebowitz, J., Mastrodonato, C., Tumulka, R., & Zanghí, N. (2009) · Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics · doi:10.1103/physreve.81.011109 · Cited by 136 · cited 2×
“See (Goldstein et al. 2010b, section 2.2) for a discussion of von Neumann’s ideas.”
BackgroundInfluentialSpontaneous inflation and the origin of the arrow of time
Carroll, S. M., & Chen, J. (2004) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/0410270 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Measures, Explanations and the Past: Should ‘Special’ Initial Conditions be Explained?
Callender, C. (2004) · British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/55.2.195 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Predictions and Primitive Ontology in Quantum Foundations: A Study of Examples
Allori, V., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R., & Zanghı̀, N. (2014) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/axs048 · Cited by 102 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Of course, the minimalist account is at odds with the idea about “dynamical governing”: 17To my knowledge, the W-GRW equations first appear in (Allori et al. 2013).”
BackgroundDe Broglie-Bohm, delayed-choice, double-slit experiment, and density matrix
Bell, J. (2009) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.560180819 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Gibbs and Boltzmann Entropy in Classical and Quantum Mechanics
Goldstein, S., Lebowitz, J., Tumulka, R., & Zanghí, N. (2019) · Statistical Mechanics and Scientific Explanation · doi:10.1142/9789811211720_0014 · Cited by 90 · cited 2×
“For recent discussions, see (Albert 2000), (Loewer 2020), (Callender 2004, 2011), (North 2011), (Lebowitz 2008), (Goldstein 2001), and (Goldstein et al. 2020).”
MethodQuantum states for primitive ontologists
Belot, G. (2012) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-011-0024-8 · Cited by 89 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Low-dimensional multi-field: on this view, the fundamental space is the physical space(time); the wave function represents a “multi-field” that assigns physical quantities to every spatial region composed of N points (Forrest 1988, Belot 2012, Chen 2017, Hubert & Romano 2018).”
BackgroundTypicality and Notions of Probability in Physics
Goldstein, S. (2012) · The frontiers collection · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21329-8_4 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Goldstein, S., & Teufel, S. (1999) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612909.013 · Cited by 86
Humean laws and circular explanation
Hicks, M. T., & van Elswyk, P. (2015) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-014-0310-3 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
On the Role of Density Matrices in Bohmian Mechanics
Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R., & Zanghí, N. (2003) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-004-1983-9 · Cited by 77 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…of 16This version of the guidance equation is first proposed by Bell (1980), then recast as the dynamical equation for the fundamental density matrix in Dürr et al. (2005). nature of order 10−15 s−1):17 WT+ = Λk(X)1/2WT−Λk(X)1/2 tr(WT−Λk(X)) , (31) where WT− is the pre-collapse density…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCan Conditioning on the “Past Hypothesis” Militate Against the Reversibility Objections?*
Winsberg, E. (2004) · Philosophia Scientiæ · doi:10.1086/423749 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
The wave-function as a multi-field
Hubert, M., & Romano, D. (2018) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-017-0198-9 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Governing Without A Fundamental Direction of Time: Minimal Primitivism about Laws of Nature
Chen, E. K., & Goldstein, S. (2022) · Jerusalem Studies in Philosophy and History of Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-96775-8_2 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citationAsymmetries in Time Problems in the Philosophy of Science
Healey, R., & Horwich, P. (1987) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2185522 · Cited by 66 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Many of these ideas can be found in (Albert 2000, 2012) and (Loewer 2007), and they are also discussed in (Frisch 2005, 2007), (Demarest 2019), (Fernandes, this volume), (Callender 2004), (Horwich 1987), and (Reichenbach 1956).”
BackgroundQuantum Mechanics in a Time-Asymmetric Universe: On the Nature of the Initial Quantum State
Chen, E. (2017) · British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/axy068 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationTime's arrow and Boltzmann's entropy
Lebowitz, J. (2008) · Scholarpedia · doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.3448 · Cited by 57 · cited 1×
“nother postulate that can be called the Fluctuation Hypothesis) and discussed in (Feynman 2017)[1965]. For recent discussions, see (Albert 2000), (Loewer 2020), (Callender 2004, 2011), (North 2011), (Lebowitz 2008), (Goldstein 2001), and (Goldstein et al. 2020). (The memorable phrase ‘Past Hypothesis’ is coined by Alb…”
BackgroundTypicality, Irreversibility and the Status of Macroscopic Laws
Lazarovici, D., & Reichert, P. (2015) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-014-9668-z · Cited by 55 · cited 1× · see citing works
“3For more on the notion of typicality and its application in statistical mechanics, see (Goldstein 2012), (Lazarovici & Reichert 2015), and (Wilhelm 2019). degrees of freedom are in a special state, providing a sense that the total state of the early universe has low entropy.”
Backgroundda Costa, N. D., & Sant'Anna, A. S. (2002) · doi:10.1023/a:1021458908383 · Cited by 51
Realism about the wave function
Chen, E. K. (2019) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12611 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationInitial conditions for cosmological perturbations
Ashtekar, A., & Gupt, B. (2016) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa52d4 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Our Fundamental Physical Space: An Essay on the Metaphysics of the Wave Function
Chen, E. (2017) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.5840/jphil2017114724 · Cited by 41 · cited 1× · see citing works
“so an open question whether it really succeeds in recovering the manifest image of low-dimensional objects. 2. Low-dimensional multi-field: this view has been explored by Forrest (1988), Belot (2012), Chen (2017) and Hubert & Romano (2018). However, this view has awkward consequences. For the Bohmian framework, the…”
BackgroundSelf-citationTypical: A Theory of Typicality and Typicality Explanation
Wilhelm, I. (2020) · British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/axz016 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Rovelli, C. (2020) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e24081022 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Sandu, A. (2021) · Cryptoreality · doi:10.5860/choice.26-3316 · Cited by 26
Time’s Arrow in a Quantum Universe: On the Status of Statistical Mechanical Probabilities
Chen, E. (2019) · Statistical Mechanics and Scientific Explanation · doi:10.1142/9789811211720_0013 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationCounterfactuals and the Past Hypothesis
Frisch, M. (2005) · Philosophia Scientiæ · doi:10.1086/508111 · Cited by 19 · cited 1×
“nomic status of the Past Hypothesis, without which they would be left completely mysterious. Many of these ideas can be found in (Albert 2000, 2012) and (Loewer 2007), and they are also discussed in (Frisch 2005, 2007), (Demarest 2019), (Fernandes, this volume), (Callender 2004), (Horwich 1987), and (Reichenbach 1956)…”
BackgroundFrom time asymmetry to quantum entanglement: The Humean unification
Chen, E. (2020) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12355 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationChen, E. (2019) · doi:10.7282/t3-aatz-r555 · Cited by 16
Self-citationMentaculus Laws and Metaphysics
Demarest, H. (2019) · Principia: an international journal of epistemology · doi:10.5007/1808-1711.2019v23n3p387 · Cited by 8 · cited 1× · see citing works
“16This version of the guidance equation is first proposed by Bell (1980), then discussed for a fundamental density matrix in Dürr et al. (2005). 17To my knowledge, the W-GRW equations first appear in (Allori et al.”
MethodUniform probability distribution over all density matrices
Chen, E., & Tumulka, R. (2020) · Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations · doi:10.1007/s40509-021-00267-5 · Cited by 7 · cited 2×
“Many of these ideas can be found in (Albert 2000, 2012) and (Loewer 2007), and they are also discussed in (Frisch 2005, 2007), (Demarest 2019), (Fernandes, this volume), (Callender 2004), (Horwich 1987), and (Reichenbach 1956).”
BackgroundSelf-citationChen, E. (2020) · doi:10.1016/s0262-4079(20)31546-3 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
14 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Governing Without A Fundamental Direction of Time: Minimal Primitivism about Laws of Nature
Chen, E. K., & Goldstein, S. (2022) · Jerusalem Studies in Philosophy and History of Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-96775-8_2 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
“See Chen (2022) for a discussion of this possibility, called “fundamental nomic vagueness.” On MinP, fundamental nomic vagueness implies that there are vague fundamental facts. Whether fundamental nomic vagueness exists in our world is a subtle question. (It is related to the issue of whether the ontic quantum state o…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationThe nomological argument for the existence of God
Hildebrand, T., & Metcalf, T. (2022) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12364 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Cuffaro, M. E., & Hartmann, S. (2021) · Philosophy of Physics · doi:10.31389/pop.90 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Chen, E. K. (2022) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.1215/00318108-9415127 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
“40See, for example, Dürr et al. (2005), Maroney (2005), Wallace (2011, 2012), and Chen (2018).”
Self-citationFrom time asymmetry to quantum entanglement: The Humean unification
Chen, E. (2020) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12355 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“4 Suggestions that PH is an additional law of nature can be found in Feynman (2017), Albert (2000), Goldstein (2001), Callender (2004), Loewer (2012), Goldstein et al. (2020) and Chen (2020b).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationChen, E. K. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009026390 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“For a more in-depth discussion, see Chen (2023b).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationThe problem of nomological harmony
Cutter, B., & Saad, B. (2023) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12463 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
The Wentaculus: Density Matrix Realism Meets the Arrow of Time
Chen, E. (2022) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.03973 · Cited by 10
“Following Albert and Loewer, let us call this package the Mentaculus: 1See Albert (2000), Goldstein (2001), Callender (2004, 2011), Lebowitz (2008), North (2011), Wallace (2023), Loewer (2020), Goldstein et al. (2020), and Chen (2023).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Open Systems View and the Everett Interpretation
Cuffaro, M. E., & Hartmann, S. (2023) · Quantum Reports · doi:10.3390/quantum5020027 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The Decoherent Arrow of Time and the Entanglement Past Hypothesis
Al-Khalili, J., & Chen, E. (2024) · Foundations of physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-024-00785-3 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“EPH 0 R and EPH ≤ mR are not entirely factorization-invariant, but they do not depend on any particular factorization as they quantify over all factorizations of a certain class R , to be specified as part of the theory.”
BackgroundSelf-citationTime's arrow and self‐locating probability
Chen, E. K. (2021) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.12834 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Our reason for assigning low prior in those theories may just be the general rule favoring simpler theories, such as Bohmian mechanics and spontaneous collapse theories (Chen 2020a).”
BackgroundSelf-citationChen, E. (2022) · Philosophers' Imprint · doi:10.3998/phimp.3250 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“For generalizations of some of those solutions to density-matrix theories such as the Everettian Wentaculus, see Chua and Chen (2023). that it makes sense to talk about Born-rule probability, either through how much I prefer certain rewards or how likely I am located in a particular branch of the…”
BackgroundSelf-citationThere is no measurement problem for Humeans
Dorst, C. (2021) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12399 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Scharnhorst, J., Wolpert, D. H., & Rovelli, C. (2024) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.02840 · Cited by 4
“A common claim is that when formulated this way, the paradox is fully resolved by the fact that past entropy was lower in the past than it is now (the “past hypothesis”) [6–9].”
BackgroundA dualist theory of experience
Saad, B. (2025) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-025-02290-3 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Fourth, suppose that some initial conditions of the universe are dictated by a law (cf. Albert (2004) and Chen (2020)).”
Absorbing the arrow of electromagnetic radiation.
Hubert, M., & Sebens, C. (2022) · Studies in history and philosophy of science · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.01.002 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Chen, E. (2024) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.01025 · Cited by 1
“With Everettian Wentaculus, the initial density matrix is pinned down by a law, and the multiverse evolution is too (Chen 2024b, 2023b).”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationDoes the Best System Need the Past Hypothesis?
Dorst, C. (2023) · Philosophia Scientiæ · doi:10.1017/psa.2023.152 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Laws of Nature and Theory Choice
Torza, A. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03950-1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Kazemian, S., Farhani, G., & Javanmard, Y. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.25260
“A common explanation for the thermodynamic arrow of time is the Past Hypothesis: the assumption that the system, or the universe as a whole, began in a very low-entropy macrostate [9–12].”
Laws, Initial Conditions and Physical Modality: Lessons from Cosmology
Antoniou, A. (2025) · Foundations of physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-025-00841-6
- Authors
- Chen, E. K.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Eddy Keming
- ORCID
- Chen, Eddy Keming
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 204-248
- arXiv
- 2008.00611
- OpenAlex
- W3046408898
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 26.75
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Harvard University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- PhilSci-Archive (University of Pittsburgh) (submittedVersion)
- PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- University of California, San Diego
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Keywords
- Past Hypothesis, arrow of time, fundamental laws of nature, boundary conditions, statistical mechanics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review