The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Innate immunity in plants and animals: emerging parallels between the recognition of general elicitors and pathogen-associated molecular patterns
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection
Dangl, J. L., & Jones, J. D. G. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35081161 · Cited by 3,949
Toll-like receptors in the induction of the innate immune response
Aderem, A., & Ulevitch, R. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35021228 · Cited by 3,064
MAP kinase signalling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity
Asai, T., Tena, G., Plotnikova, J., Willmann, M. R., Chiu, W.-L., Gomez-Gomez, L., Boller, T., Ausubel, F. M., & Sheen, J. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415977a · Cited by 2,726
Innate Immunity: The Virtues of a Nonclonal System of Recognition
Medzhitov, R., & Janeway, C. A. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80412-2 · Cited by 2,434
A Receptor Kinase-Like Protein Encoded by the Rice Disease Resistance Gene, Xa21
Song, W.-Y., Wang, G.-L., Chen, L.-L., Kim, H.-S., Pi, L.-Y., Holsten, T., Gardner, J., Wang, B., Zhai, W.-X., Zhu, L.-H., et al. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5243.1804 · Cited by 2,292
Gómez-Gómez, L., & Boller, T. (2000) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80265-8 · Cited by 2,280
Plants have a sensitive perception system for the most conserved domain of bacterial flagellin
Felix, G., Duran, J. D., Volko, S., & Boller, T. (1999) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00265.x · Cited by 1,715
Mackey, D., Holt, B. F., Wiig, A., & Dangl, J. L. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00661-x · Cited by 1,200
Wilson, C. L., Ouellette, A. J., Satchell, D. P., Ayabe, T., López-Boado, Y. S., Stratman, J. L., Hultgren, S. J., Matrisian, L. M., & Parks, W. C. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5437.113 · Cited by 1,074
Plant disease-resistance proteins and the gene-for-gene concept
Van Der Biezen, E. A., & Jones, J. D. G. (1998) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01311-5 · Cited by 877
Cited by
SIGNALING IN THE ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL SYMBIOSIS
Harrison, M. J. (2005) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.58.030603.123749 · Cited by 785
Ma, Z., Song, T., Zhu, L., Ye, W., Wang, Y., Shao, Y., Dong, S., Zhang, Z., Dou, D., Zheng, X., et al. (2015) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.15.00390 · Cited by 434
Molecular Genetics of Pathogenic Oomycetes
Kamoun, S. (2003) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.2.2.191-199.2003 · Cited by 371
Non‐host resistance in plants: new insights into an old phenomenon
NÜRNBERGER, T., & LIPKA, V. (2005) · Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/j.1364-3703.2005.00279.x · Cited by 346
Self-citationMarshall, R., Kombrink, A., Motteram, J., Loza-Reyes, E., Lucas, J., Hammond-Kosack, K. E., Thomma, B. P. H. J., & Rudd, J. J. (2011) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.111.176347 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Nürnberger, T., & Brunner, F.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Plant Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 318-324
- ISSN
- 1369-5266 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993549923
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Innate immunity in plants and animals: emerging parallels between the recognition of general elicitors and pathogen-associated molecular patterns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1369-5266(02)00265-0
- The paper
- Nürnberger, T., & Brunner, F. (2002). Innate immunity in plants and animals: emerging parallels between the recognition of general elicitors and pathogen-associated molecular patterns. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1369-5266(02)00265-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
