The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 10-year analysis of the ATAC trial
Abstract
Background The Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of anastrozole (1 mg) with tamoxifen (20 mg), both given orally every day for 5 years, as adjuvant treatment for postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer. In this analysis, we assess the long-term outcomes after a median follow-up of 120 months.Methods We used a proportional hazards model to assess the primary endpoint of disease-free survival, and the secondary endpoints of time to recurrence, time to distant recurrence, incidence of new contralateral breast cancer, overall survival, and death with or without recurrence in all randomised patients (anastrozole n=3125, tamoxifen n=3116) and hormone-receptor-positive patients (anastrozole n=2618, tamoxifen n=2598). After treatment completion, we continued to collect data on fractures and serious adverse events in a masked fashion (safety population: anastrozole n=3092, tamoxifen n=3094). This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN18233230.Findings Patients were followed up for a median of 120 months (range 0-145); there were 24,522 woman-years of follow-up in the anastrozole group and 23,950 woman-years in the tamoxifen group. In the full study population, there were significant improvements in the anastrozole group compared with the tamoxifen group for disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0·91, 95% CI 0·83-0·99; p=0·04), time to recurrence (0·84, 0·75-0·93; p=0·001), and time to distant recurrence (0·87, 0·77-0·99; p=0·03). For hormone-receptor-positive patients, the results were also significantly in favour of the anastrozole group for disease-free survival (HR 0·86, 95% CI 0·78-0·95; p=0·003), time to recurrence (0·79, 0·70-0·89; p=0·0002), and time to distant recurrence (0·85, 0·73-0·98; p=0·02). In hormone-receptor-positive patients, absolute differences in time to recurrence between anastrozole and tamoxifen increased over time (2·7% at 5 years and 4·3% at 10 years) and recurrence rates remained significantly lower on anastrozole than tamoxifen after treatment completion (HR 0·81, 95% CI 0·67-0·98; p=0·03), although the carryover benefit was smaller after 8 years. There was weak evidence of fewer deaths after recurrence with anastrozole compared with tamoxifen treatment in the hormone-receptor-positive subgroup (HR 0·87, 95% CI 0·74-1·02; p=0·09), but there was little difference in overall mortality (0·95, 95% CI 0·84-1·06; p=0·4). Fractures were more frequent during active treatment in patients receiving anastrozole than those receiving tamoxifen (451 vs 351; OR 1·33, 95% CI 1·15-1·55; p<0·0001), but were similar in the post-treatment follow-up period (110 vs 112; OR 0·98, 95% CI 0·74-1·30; p=0·9). Treatment-related serious adverse events were less common in the anastrozole group than the tamoxifen group (223 anastrozole vs 369 tamoxifen; OR 0·57, 95% CI 0·48-0·69; p<0·0001), but were similar after treatment completion (66 vs 78; OR 0·84, 95% CI 0·60-1·19; p=0·3). No differences in non-breast cancer causes of death were apparent and the incidence of other cancers was similar between groups (425 vs 431) and continue to be higher with anastrozole for colorectal (66 vs 44) and lung cancer (51 vs 34), and lower for endometrial cancer (six vs 24), melanoma (eight vs 19), and ovarian cancer (17 vs 28). No new safety concerns were reported.Interpretation These data confirm the long-term superior efficacy and safety of anastrozole over tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_37 · Cited by 26,297
Howell, A., Cuzick, J. M., Baum, M., Buzdar, A. U., Dowsett, M., Forbes, J., Hoctin-Boes, G., Houghton, J., Locker, G. Y., & Tobias, J. S. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17666-6 · Cited by 2,284
Self-citationBaum, M., Budzar, A. U., Cuzick, J. M., Forbes, J., Houghton, J., Klijn, J. G. M., & Sahmoud, T. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09088-8 · Cited by 1,958
Self-citationGoss, P. E., Ingle, J. N., Martino, S., Robert, N. J., Muss, H. B., Piccart, M. J., Castiglione, M., Tu, D., Shepherd, L. E., Pritchard, K. I., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032312 · Cited by 1,795
Nabholtz, J., Buzdar, A. U., Pollak, M., Harwin, W. N., Burton, G., Mangalik, A., Steinberg, M., Webster, A., & von Euler, M. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2000.18.22.3758 · Cited by 989
Self-citationWilliams, N. (2008) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(07)70385-6 · Cited by 918
Coombes, R. C., Kilburn, L., Snowdon, C. F., Paridaens, R., Coleman, R., Jones, S., Jassem, J., van de Velde, C., Delozier, T., Álvarez, I., et al. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60200-1 · Cited by 901
Self-citationJakesz, R., Jonat, W., Gnant, M., Mittlboeck, M., Greil, R., Tausch, C., Hilfrich, J., Kwasny, W., Menzel, C., Samonigg, H., et al. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67059-6 · Cited by 877
The ATAC (Arimidex, T. A. O. I. C. T. G. (2003) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.11745 · Cited by 861
Bonneterre, J. M., Thurlimann, B. J. K., Robertson, J. F. R., Krzakowski, M. J., Mauriac, L., Koralewski, P., Vergote, I. B., Webster, A., Steinberg, M., & von Euler, M. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2000.18.22.3748 · Cited by 839
Meta-Analysis of Breast Cancer Outcomes in Adjuvant Trials of Aromatase Inhibitors Versus Tamoxifen
Dowsett, M., Cuzick, J. M., Ingle, J. N., Coates, A. S., Forbes, J., Bliss, J. M., Buyse, M. E., Baum, M., Buzdar, A. U., Colleoni, M. A., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.23.1274 · Cited by 809
Self-citationLetrozole Therapy Alone or in Sequence with Tamoxifen in Women with Breast Cancer
The BIG 1-98 Collaborative Group (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810818 · Cited by 498
‡ (2006) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(06)70767-7 · Cited by 462
Mamounas, E. P., Jeong, J., Wickerham, D. L., Smith, R. E., Ganz, P. A., Land, S. R., Eisen, A. F., Fehrenbacher, L., Farrar, W. B., Atkins, J. N., et al. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.14.0228 · Cited by 344
Reid, D. M., Doughty, J., Eastell, R., Heys, S. D., Howell, A., McCloskey, E. V., Powles, T. J., Selby, P. L., & Coleman, R. E. (2008) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.03.007 · Cited by 229
Self-citationBoccardo, F., RUBAGOTTI, A., Guglielmini, P., Fini, A., Paladini, G., Mesiti, M., Rinaldini, M., Scali, S., Porpiglia, M., Benedetto, C., et al. (2006) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl941 · Cited by 220
Jakesz, R., Samonigg, H., Greil, R., Gnant, M., Schmid, M., Kwasny, W., Kubista, E., Mlineritsch, B., Tausch, C., & Stierer, M. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.23.16_suppl.527 · Cited by 120
Boccardo, F., RUBAGOTTI, A., Puntoni, M., Guglielmini, P., Porpiglia, M., Mesiti, M., Rinaldini, M., Paladini, G., Distante, V., & Franchi, R. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.23.16_suppl.526 · Cited by 100
Jones, S., Seynaeve, C., Hasenburg, A., Rae, D., Vannetzel, J.-M., Paridaens, R., Markopoulos, C. J., Hozumi, Y., Putter, H., Hille, E. T. M., et al. (2009) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs-15 · Cited by 63
Should aromatase inhibitors be used as initial adjuvant treatment or sequenced after tamoxifen?
Cuzick, J. M., Sasieni, P. D., & Howell, A. (2006) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602964 · Cited by 61
Self-citationTheodossiou, C., Schwarzenberger, P., Espinoza‐Delgado, I., Wynn, R. T., & Schapira, D. V. (1997) · Oncology Reports · doi:10.3892/or.4.6.1305 · Cited by 47
Rea, D., Hasenburg, A., Seynaeve, C., Jones, S., Vannetzel, J. M., Paridaens, R., Markopoulos, C. J., Hozumi, Y., Putter, H., Hille, E. T. M., et al. (2009) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs-09-11 · Cited by 44
Update of the BIG 1–98 Trial: Where do we stand?
Joerger, M., & Thurlimann, B. J. K. (2009) · The Breast · doi:10.1016/s0960-9776(09)70278-4 · Cited by 16
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Aebi, S. P., Davidson, T., Gruber, G., & Castiglione, M. (2010) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq159 · Cited by 2,853
Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Cardoso, F., Kyriakides, S., Ohno, S., Penault-Llorca, F., Poortmans, P., Rubio, I. T., Zackrisson, S., & Senkus, E. (2019) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdz173 · Cited by 2,214
Risk Factors and Preventions of Breast Cancer
Sun, Y.-S., Zhao, Z., Yang, Z.-N., Fang, X., Lu, H.-J., Zhu, Z.-Y., Shi, W., Jiang, J., Yao, P.-P., & Zhu, H.-P. (2017) · International Journal of Biological Sciences · doi:10.7150/ijbs.21635 · Cited by 2,242
Breast Cancer, Version 4.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Gradishar, W. J., Anderson, B. O., Balassanian, R., Blair, S. L., Burstein, H. J., Cyr, A. E., ELIAS, A. D., Farrar, W. B., Forero, A., Giordano, S. H., et al. (2018) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2018.0012 · Cited by 1,612
Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Senkus, E., Kyriakides, S., Ohno, S., Penault-Llorca, F. M., Poortmans, P. M., Rutgers, E. J. T., Zackrisson, S., & Cardoso, F. (2015) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv298 · Cited by 1,660
Metadata
- Authors
- Cuzick, J., Sestak, I., Baum, M., Buzdar, A., Howell, A., Dowsett, M., & Forbes, J. F.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Cancer Research UK (GB)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- Royal Marsden Hospital (GB)
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Cuzick, Jack
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1135-1141
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2112780046
- Cited by
- 1,674
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 101 · 2015: 116 · 2014: 125 · 2013: 148 · 2012: 121
- FWCI
- 51.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Lancet Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- AstraZeneca
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Estrogen and related hormone effects
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
- Keywords
- anastrozole, tamoxifen, adjuvant endocrine therapy, early breast cancer, postmenopausal women, disease-free survival, time to recurrence, distant recurrence, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, contralateral breast cancer, overall survival, fracture risk, long-term outcomes, ATAC trial, aromatase inhibitors, selective estrogen receptor modulators, breast cancer recurrence
- MeSH terms
- Anastrozole, Administration, Oral, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Neoplasm Staging, Nitriles, Tamoxifen, Triazoles, Treatment Outcome, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Postmenopause, Kaplan-Meier Estimate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review