The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin with or without erlotinib in advanced biliary-tract cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and a platinum-based agent is regarded as a standard treatment for patients with advanced biliary-tract cancer. Results of phase 2 trials of single-agent erlotinib in biliary-tract cancer and of gemcitabine plus erlotinib in pancreatic cancer have shown modest benefits. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin plus erlotinib versus chemotherapy alone for advanced biliary-tract cancer. METHODS In this open label, randomised, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients (in a 1:1 ratio) with metastatic biliary-tract cancer (cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, or ampulla of Vater cancer) to receive either first-line treatment with chemotherapy alone (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 2) or chemotherapy plus erlotinib (100 mg daily). Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. Randomisation was done centrally (stratified by participating centre and presence of measurable lesion). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Analyses were by intention-to-treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01149122. FINDINGS 133 patients were randomly assigned to the chemotherapy alone group and 135 to the chemotherapy plus erlotinib group. The groups were balanced except for a higher proportion of patients with cholangiocarcinoma in the group given erlotinib than in the chemotherapy alone group (96 [71%] patients vs 84 [63%]). Median progression-free survival was 4·2 months (95% CI 2·7-5·7) in the chemotherapy alone group and 5·8 months (95% CI 4·6-7·0) in the chemotherapy plus erlotinib group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·80, 95% CI 0·61-1·03; p=0·087). Significantly more patients had an objective response in the chemotherapy plus erlotinib group than in the chemotherapy alone group (40 patients vs 21 patients; p=0·005), but median overall survival was the same in both groups (9·5 months [95% CI 7·5-11·5] in the chemotherapy alone group and 9·5 months [7·6-11·4] in the chemotherapy plus erlotinib group; HR 0·93, 0·69-1·25; p=0·611). All-cause deaths within 30 days of random assignment occurred in one (1%) of the patients in the chemotherapy alone group and in four (3%) of those in the chemotherapy plus erlotinib group. The most common grade 3-4 adverse event was febrile neutropenia (eight [6%] patients in the chemotherapy alone group and six [4%] in the chemotherapy plus erlotinib group). No patient died of treatment-related causes during the study. Subgroup analyses by primary site of disease showed that for patients with cholangiocarcinoma, the addition of erlotinib to chemotherapy significantly prolonged median progression-free survival (5·9 months [95% CI 4·7-7·1] for chemotherapy plus erlotinib vs 3·0 months [1·1-4·9] for chemotherapy alone; HR 0·73, 95% CI 0·53-1·00; p=0·049). INTERPRETATION Although no significant difference in progression-free survival was noted between groups, the addition of erlotinib to gemcitabine and oxaliplatin showed antitumour activity and might be a treatment option for patients with cholangiocarcinoma. FUNDING None.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors
Therasse, P., Arbuck, S. G., Eisenhauer, E. A., Wanders, J., Kaplan, R. S., Rubinstein, L., Verweij, J., Van Glabbeke, M., van Oosterom, A. T., Christian, M. C., et al. (2000) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/92.3.205 · Cited by 15,660
Cisplatin plus Gemcitabine versus Gemcitabine for Biliary Tract Cancer
Valle, J., Wasan, H., Palmer, D. H., Cunningham, D., Anthoney, A., Maraveyas, A., Madhusudan, S., Iveson, T., Hughes, S., Pereira, S. P., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0908721 · Cited by 4,406
Moore, M. J., Goldstein, D., Hamm, J., Figer, A., Hecht, J. R., Gallinger, S., Au, H. J., Murawa, P., Walde, D., Wolff, R. A., et al. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.07.9525 · Cited by 3,848
Chemotherapy improves survival and quality of life in advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer
Glimelius, B., Hoffman, K., Sjödén, P.-O., Jacobsson, G., Sellström, H., Enander, L.-K., Linné, T., & Svensson, C. (1996) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010676 · Cited by 797
Chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract carcinoma: a pooled analysis of clinical trials
Eckel, F., & Schmid, R. M. (2007) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603648 · Cited by 464
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE)
(2008) · Principles and Practice of Clinical Trial Medicine · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-373695-6.00022-3 · Cited by 457
Yoshikawa, D., Ojima, H., Iwasaki, M., Hiraoka, N., Kosuge, T., Kasai, S., Hirohashi, S., & Shibata, T. (2008) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604129 · Cited by 404
André, T., Tournigand, C., Rosmorduc, O., Provent, S., Maindrault-Goebel, F., Avenin, D., Selle, F., Paye, F., Hannoun, L., Houry, S., et al. (2004) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdh351 · Cited by 380
Phase II Study of Erlotinib in Patients With Advanced Biliary Cancer
Philip, P. A., Mahoney, M. R., Allmer, C., Thomas, J., Pitot, H. C., Kim, G., Donehower, R. C., Fitch, T., Picus, J., & Erlichman, C. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.05.3579 · Cited by 318
Zhu, A. X., Meyerhardt, J. A., Blaszkowsky, L. S., Kambadakone, A. R., Muzikansky, A., Zheng, H., Clark, J. W., Abrams, T. A., Chan, J. A., Enzinger, P. C., et al. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70333-x · Cited by 303
Cited by
Durvalumab plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer
Oh, D.-Y., Ruth He, A., Qin, S., Chen, L.-T., Okusaka, T., Vogel, A., Kim, J. W., Suksombooncharoen, T., Ah Lee, M., Kitano, M., et al. (2022) · NEJM Evidence · doi:10.1056/evidoa2200015 · Cited by 1,217
Self-citationSystemic therapies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Kelley, R. K., Bridgewater, J., Gores, G. J., & Zhu, A. X. (2020) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2019.10.009 · Cited by 412
Mazzaferro, V., El-Rayes, B. F., Droz dit Busset, M., Cotsoglou, C., Harris, W. P., Damjanov, N., Masi, G., Rimassa, L., Personeni, N., Braiteh, F., et al. (2019) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-018-0334-0 · Cited by 365
Morizane, C., Okusaka, T., Mizusawa, J., Katayama, H., Ueno, M., Ikeda, M., Ozaka, M., Okano, N., Sugimori, K., Fukutomi, A., et al. (2019) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdz402 · Cited by 322
Ioka, T., Kanai, M., Kobayashi, S., Sakai, D., Eguchi, H., Baba, H., Seo, S., Taketomi, A., Takayama, T., Yamaue, H., et al. (2023) · Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences · doi:10.1002/jhbp.1219 · Cited by 249
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, J., Park, S. H., Chang, H.-M., Kim, J. S., Choi, H. J., Lee, M. A., Chang, J. S., Jeung, H. C., Kang, J. H., Lee, H. W., Shin, D. B., Kang, H. J., Sun, J.-M., Park, J. O., Park, Y. S., Kang, W. K., & Lim, H. Y.
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 181-188
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168106806
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 24.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin with or without erlotinib in advanced biliary-tract cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70301-1
- The paper
- Lee, J., Park, S. H., Chang, H.-M., Kim, J. S., Choi, H. J., Lee, M. A., Chang, J. S., Jeung, H. C., Kang, J. H., Lee, H. W., Shin, D. B., Kang, H. J., Sun, J.-M., Park, J. O., Park, Y. S., Kang, W. K., & Lim, H. Y. (2012). Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin with or without erlotinib in advanced biliary-tract cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70301-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.