Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 322

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Combination gemcitabine plus S-1 versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin for advanced/recurrent biliary tract cancer: the FUGA-BT (JCOG1113) randomized phase III clinical trial

Open access
Morizane, C., Okusaka, T., Mizusawa, J., Katayama, H., Ueno, M., Ikeda, M., Ozaka, M., Okano, N., Sugimori, K., Fukutomi, A., Hara, H., Mizuno, N., Yanagimoto, H., Wada, K., Tobimatsu, K., Yane, K., Nakamori, S., Yamaguchi, H., Asagi, A., Yukisawa, S., Kojima, Y., Kawabe, K., Kawamoto, Y., Sugimoto, R., Iwai, T., Nakamura, K., Miyakawa, H., Yamashita, T., Hosokawa, A., Ioka, T., Kato, N., Shioji, K., Shimizu, K., Nakagohri, T., Kamata, K., Ishii, H., Furuse, J.·2019·Annals of Oncology

Abstract

BACKGROUND Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) is the standard treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC); however, it causes nausea, vomiting, and anorexia, and requires hydration. Gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) reportedly has equal to, or better, efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile. We aimed to confirm the non-inferiority of GS to GC for patients with advanced/recurrent BTC in terms of overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS We undertook a Phase III randomized trial in 33 institutions in Japan. Eligibility criteria included chemotherapy-naïve patients with recurrent or unresectable BTC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0-1, and adequate organ function. The calculated sample size was 350 with a 1-sided alpha of 5%, a power of 80%, and non-inferiority margin hazard ratio of 1.155. The primary endpoint was OS, while the secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), adverse events (AEs), and clinically significant AEs defined as grade ≥2 fatigue, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, oral mucositis, or diarrhea. RESULTS Between May 2013 and March 2016, 354 patients were enrolled. GS was found to be non-inferior to GC (median OS: 13.4 months with GC and 15.1 months with GS, hazard ratio [HR], 0.945; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-1.15; P=0.046 for non-inferiority). The median PFS was 5.8 months with GC and 6.8 months with GS (HR, 0.86, 95% CI, 0.70-1.07). The RR was 32.4% with GC and 29.8% with GS. Both treatments were generally well-tolerated. Clinically significant AEs were observed in 35.1% of patients in the GC arm and 29.9% in the GS arm. CONCLUSIONS GS, which does not require hydration, should be considered a new, convenient standard of care option for patients with advanced/recurrent BTC.This trial has been registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm), number UMIN000010667.ORCID : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6560-7503.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annonc/mdz402

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 322

Metadata

Authors
Morizane, C., Okusaka, T., Mizusawa, J., Katayama, H., Ueno, M., Ikeda, M., Ozaka, M., Okano, N., Sugimori, K., Fukutomi, A., Hara, H., Mizuno, N., Yanagimoto, H., Wada, K., Tobimatsu, K., Yane, K., Nakamori, S., Yamaguchi, H., Asagi, A., Yukisawa, S., Kojima, Y., Kawabe, K., Kawamoto, Y., Sugimoto, R., Iwai, T., Nakamura, K., Miyakawa, H., Yamashita, T., Hosokawa, A., Ioka, T., Kato, N., Shioji, K., Shimizu, K., Nakagohri, T., Kamata, K., Ishii, H., & Furuse, J.
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
30
Issue
12
Pages
1950-1958
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2977982707
Cited by
322
References
18
FWCI
29.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combination gemcitabine plus S-1 versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin for advanced/recurrent biliary tract cancer: the FUGA-BT (JCOG1113) randomized phase III clinical trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/annonc/mdz402
The paper
Morizane, C., Okusaka, T., Mizusawa, J., Katayama, H., Ueno, M., Ikeda, M., Ozaka, M., Okano, N., Sugimori, K., Fukutomi, A., Hara, H., Mizuno, N., Yanagimoto, H., Wada, K., Tobimatsu, K., Yane, K., Nakamori, S., Yamaguchi, H., Asagi, A., . . . Furuse, J. (2019). Combination gemcitabine plus S-1 versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin for advanced/recurrent biliary tract cancer: the FUGA-BT (JCOG1113) randomized phase III clinical trial. Annals of Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz402

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.