The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of T-cell-epitope matching at HLA-DPB1 in recipients of unrelated-donor haemopoietic-cell transplantation: a retrospective study
Open accessAbstract
Summary Background The risks after unrelated-donor haemopoietic-cell transplantation with matched HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DQB1 alleles between donor and recipient (10/10 matched) can be decreased by selection of unrelated donors who also match for HLA-DPB1; however, such donors are difficult to find. Classification of HLA-DPB1 mismatches based on T-cell-epitope groups could identify mismatches that might be tolerated (permissive) and those that would increase risks (non-permissive) after transplantation. We did a retrospective study to compare outcomes between permissive and non-permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatches in unrelated-donor haemopoietic-cell transplantation. Methods HLA and clinical data for unrelated-donor transplantations submitted to the International Histocompatibility Working Group in haemopoietic-cell transplantation were analysed retrospectively. HLA-DPB1 T-cell-epitope groups were assigned according to a functional algorithm based on alloreactive T-cell crossreactivity patterns. Recipients and unrelated donors matching status were classified as HLA-DPB1 match, non-permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatch (those with mismatched T-cell-epitope groups), or permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatch (those with matched T-cell-epitope groups). The clinical outcomes assessed were overall mortality, non-relapse mortality, relapse, and severe (grade 3–4) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD). Findings Of 8539 transplantations, 5428 (64%) were matched for ten of ten HLA alleles (HLA 10/10 matched) and 3111 (36%) for nine of ten alleles (HLA 9/10 matched). Of the group overall, 1719 (20%) were HLA-DPB1 matches, 2670 (31%) non-permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatches, and 4150 (49%) permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatches. In HLA 10/10-matched transplantations, non-permissive mismatches were associated with a significantly increased risk of overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1·15, 95% CI 1·05–1·25; p=0·002), non-relapse mortality (1·28, 1·14–1·42; p<0·0001), and severe aGvHD (odds ratio [OR] 1·31, 95% CI 1·11–1·54; p=0·001), but not relapse (HR 0·89, 95% CI 0·77–1·02; p=0·10), compared with permissive mismatches. There were significant differences between permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatches and HLA-DPB1 matches in terms of non-relapse mortality (0·86, 0·75–0·98; p=0·03) and relapse (1·34, 1·17–1·54; p<0·0001), but not for overall mortality (0·96, 0·87–1·06; p=0·40) or aGvHD (OR 0·84, 95% CI 0·69–1·03; p=0·09). In the HLA 9/10 matched population, non-permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatches also increased the risk of overall mortality (HR 1·10, 95% CI 1·00–1·22; p=0·06), non-relapse mortality (1·19, 1·05–1·36; p=0·007), and severe aGvHD (OR 1·37, 95% CI 1·13–1·66; p=0·002) compared with permissive mismatches, but the risk of relapse was the same in both groups (HR 0·93, 95% CI 0·78–1·11; p=0·44). Outcomes for HLA 10/10-matched transplantations with non-permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatches did not differ substantially from those for HLA 9/10-matched transplantations with permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatches or HLA-DPB1 matches. Interpretation T-cell-epitope matching defines permissive and non-permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatches. Avoidance of an unrelated donor with a non-permissive T-cell-epitope mismatch at HLA-DPB1 might provide a practical clinical strategy for lowering the risks of mortality after unrelated-donor haemopoietic-cell transplantation. Funding National Institutes of Health; Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro; Telethon Foundation; Italian Ministry of Health; Cariplo Foundation; National Cancer Institute; National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Office of Naval Research; IRGHET Paris; Swedish Cancer Society; Children's Cancer Foundation; Swedish Research Council; Cancer Society in Stockholm; Karolinska Institutet; and Leukemia and Lymphoma Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lee, S. J., Klein, J., Haagenson, M., Baxter-Lowe, L. A., Confer, D. L., Eapen, M., Fernandez-Vina, M., Flomenberg, N., Horowitz, M., Hurley, C. K., et al. (2007) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2007-06-097386 · Cited by 1,255
Self-citationCentral tolerance: learning self-control in the thymus
Hogquist, K. A., Baldwin, T. A., & Jameson, S. C. (2005) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1707 · Cited by 659
Eapen, M., Rocha, V., Sanz, G., Scaradavou, A., Zhang, M.-J., Arcese, W., Sirvent, A., Champlin, R. E., Chao, N., Gee, A. P., et al. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70127-3 · Cited by 586
Self-citationDissecting cancer through mathematics: From the cell to the animal model
Byrne, H. M. (2010) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2808 · Cited by 442
Morishima, Y. (2002) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v99.11.4200 · Cited by 427
Self-citationJenq, R. R., & van den Brink, M. R. M. (2010) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2804 · Cited by 299
Kawase, T., Morishima, Y., Matsuo, K., Kashiwase, K., Inoko, H., Saji, H., Kato, S., Juji, T., Kodera, Y., & Sasazuki, T. (2007) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2007-02-072405 · Cited by 254
Self-citationZino, E. (2003) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2003-04-1279 · Cited by 231
Self-citationThe importance of HLA-DPB1 in unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation
Shaw, B. E., Gooley, T. A., Malkki, M., Madrigal, J. A., Begovich, A. B., Horowitz, M. M., Gratwohl, A., Ringdén, O., Marsh, S. G. E., & Petersdorf, E. W. (2007) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2007-06-095265 · Cited by 190
Self-citationLoiseau, P., Busson, M., Balere, M.-L., Dormoy, A., Bignon, J.-D., Gagne, K., Gebuhrer, L., Dubois, V., Jollet, I., Bois, M., et al. (2007) · Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation · doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.04.010 · Cited by 177
Self-citation
Cited by
Intestinal Microbiota and Relapse After Hematopoietic-Cell Transplantation
Peled, J. U., Devlin, S. M., Staffas, A., Lumish, M., Khanin, R., Littmann, E. R., Ling, L., Kosuri, S., Maloy, M., Slingerland, J. B., et al. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2016.70.3348 · Cited by 325
High HLA-DP Expression and Graft-versus-Host Disease
Petersdorf, E. W., Malkki, M., O’hUigin, C., Carrington, M., Gooley, T., Haagenson, M. D., Horowitz, M. M., Spellman, S. R., Wang, T., & Stevenson, P. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1500140 · Cited by 278
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fleischhauer, K., Shaw, B. E., Gooley, T., Malkki, M., Bardy, P., Bignon, J.-D., Dubois, V., Horowitz, M. M., Madrigal, J. A., Morishima, Y., Oudshoorn, M., Ringden, O., Spellman, S., Velardi, A., Zino, E., & Petersdorf, E. W.
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 366-374
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158811848
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 16.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of T-cell-epitope matching at HLA-DPB1 in recipients of unrelated-donor haemopoietic-cell transplantation: a retrospective study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70004-9
- The paper
- Fleischhauer, K., Shaw, B. E., Gooley, T., Malkki, M., Bardy, P., Bignon, J.-D., Dubois, V., Horowitz, M. M., Madrigal, J. A., Morishima, Y., Oudshoorn, M., Ringden, O., Spellman, S., Velardi, A., Zino, E., & Petersdorf, E. W. (2012). Effect of T-cell-epitope matching at HLA-DPB1 in recipients of unrelated-donor haemopoietic-cell transplantation: a retrospective study. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70004-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.