Cited by 646Lung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Research Studies

Pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable non-small-cell lung cancers: proposal for the use of major pathological response as a surrogate endpoint

Open access
Hellmann, Matthew D, Chaft, Jamie E, William, William N, Rusch, Valerie, Pisters, Katherine M W, Kalhor, Neda, Pataer, Apar, Travis, William D +2 more·2014·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

Improvements in outcomes for patients with resectable lung cancers have plateaued. Clinical trials of resectable non-small-cell lung cancers with overall survival as the primary endpoint require a decade or longer to complete, are expensive, and limit innovation. A surrogate for survival, such as pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, has the potential to improve the efficiency of trials and expedite advances. 10% or less residual viable tumour after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, termed here major pathological response, meets criteria for a surrogate; major pathological response strongly associates with improved survival, is reflective of treatment effect, and captures the magnitude of the treatment benefit on survival. We support the incorporation of major pathological response as a surrogate endpoint for survival in future neoadjuvant trials of resectable lung cancers. Additional prospective studies are needed to confirm the validity and reproducibility of major pathological response within individual histological and molecular subgroups and with new drugs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70334-6

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hellmann, M. D., Chaft, J. E., William, W. N., Rusch, V., Pisters, K. M. W., Kalhor, N., Pataer, A., Travis, W. D., Swisher, S. G., & Kris, M. G.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Kris, Mark G
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
e42-e50
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134291074
Cited by
646
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 111 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30CA008748, P30CA016672)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
non-small cell lung cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, major pathological response, surrogate endpoints, resectable lung cancer, overall survival, clinical trial design, treatment response
MeSH terms
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Neoplasm Staging, Biomarkers, Neoadjuvant Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review