The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5—a population-based study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND Cancer survival is a key measure of the effectiveness of health-care systems. EUROCARE-the largest cooperative study of population-based cancer survival in Europe-has shown persistent differences between countries for cancer survival, although in general, cancer survival is improving. Major changes in cancer diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation occurred in the early 2000s. EUROCARE-5 assesses their effect on cancer survival in 29 European countries. METHODS In this retrospective observational study, we analysed data from 107 cancer registries for more than 10 million patients with cancer diagnosed up to 2007 and followed up to 2008. Uniform quality control procedures were applied to all datasets. For patients diagnosed 2000-07, we calculated 5-year relative survival for 46 cancers weighted by age and country. We also calculated country-specific and age-specific survival for ten common cancers, together with survival differences between time periods (for 1999-2001, 2002-04, and 2005-07). FINDINGS 5-year relative survival generally increased steadily over time for all European regions. The largest increases from 1999-2001 to 2005-07 were for prostate cancer (73.4% [95% CI 72.9-73.9] vs 81.7% [81.3-82.1]), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (53.8% [53.3-54.4] vs 60.4% [60.0-60.9]), and rectal cancer (52.1% [51.6-52.6] vs 57.6% [57.1-58.1]). Survival in eastern Europe was generally low and below the European mean, particularly for cancers with good or intermediate prognosis. Survival was highest for northern, central, and southern Europe. Survival in the UK and Ireland was intermediate for rectal cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, skin melanoma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, but low for kidney, stomach, ovarian, colon, and lung cancers. Survival for lung cancer in the UK and Ireland was much lower than for other regions for all periods, although results for lung cancer in some regions (central and eastern Europe) might be affected by overestimation. Survival usually decreased with age, although to different degrees depending on region and cancer type. INTERPRETATION The major advances in cancer management that occurred up to 2007 seem to have resulted in improved survival in Europe. Likely explanations of differences in survival between countries include: differences in stage at diagnosis and accessibility to good care, different diagnostic intensity and screening approaches, and differences in cancer biology. Variations in socioeconomic, lifestyle, and general health between populations might also have a role. Further studies are needed to fully interpret these findings and how to remedy disparities. FUNDING Italian Ministry of Health, European Commission, Compagnia di San Paolo Foundation, Cariplo Foundation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Standard cancer patient population for age standardising survival ratios
Corazziari, I., Quinn, M., & Capocaccia, R. (2004) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2004.07.002 · Cited by 589
Self-citation
Cited by
Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer
Rawla, P. (2019) · World Journal of Oncology · doi:10.14740/wjon1191 · Cited by 2,776
Allemani, C., Weir, H. K., Carreira, H., Harewood, R., Spika, D., Wang, X.-S., Bannon, F., Ahn, J. V., Johnson, C. J., Bonaventure, A., et al. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)62038-9 · Cited by 2,614
Self-citationGlobal cancer in women: burden and trends.
Torre, L. A., Islami, F., Siegel, R. L., Ward, E. M., & Jemal, A. (2017) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0858 · Cited by 1,245
The global burden of women's cancers: a grand challenge in global health
Ginsburg, O., Bray, F., Coleman, M. P., Vanderpuye, V., Eniu, A., Kotha, S. R., Sarker, M., Huong, T. T., Allemani, C., Dvaladze, A., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31392-7 · Cited by 1,127
Self-citationArnold, M., Rutherford, M. J., Bardot, A., Ferlay, J., Andersson, T. M.-L., Myklebust, T. Å., Tervonen, H., Thursfield, V., Ransom, D., Shack, L., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30456-5 · Cited by 1,063
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- De Angelis, R., Sant, M., Coleman, M. P., Francisci, S., Baili, P., Pierannunzio, D., Trama, A., Visser, O., Brenner, H., Ardanaz, E., Bielska-Lasota, M., Engholm, G., Nennecke, A., Siesling, S., Berrino, F., & Capocaccia, R.
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-34
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132611552
- Cited by
- 1,890
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 85.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5—a population-based study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70546-1
- The paper
- De Angelis, R., Sant, M., Coleman, M. P., Francisci, S., Baili, P., Pierannunzio, D., Trama, A., Visser, O., Brenner, H., Ardanaz, E., Bielska-Lasota, M., Engholm, G., Nennecke, A., Siesling, S., Berrino, F., & Capocaccia, R. (2014). Cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5—a population-based study. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70546-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.