The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Response assessment criteria for brain metastases: proposal from the RANO group
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534
Self-citationNew Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors
Therasse, P., Arbuck, S. G., Eisenhauer, E. A., Wanders, J., Kaplan, R. S., Rubinstein, L., Verweij, J., Van Glabbeke, M., van Oosterom, A. T., Christian, M. C., et al. (2000) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/92.3.205 · Cited by 15,660
Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma.
Macdonald, D. R., Cascino, T. L., Schold, S. C., & Cairncross, J. G. (1990) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1990.8.7.1277 · Cited by 2,409
Self-citation
Cited by
Le Rhun, E., Weller, M., Brandsma, D., Van den Bent, M., de Azambuja, E., Henriksson, R., Boulanger, T., Peters, S., Watts, C., Wick, W., et al. (2017) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx221 · Cited by 637
Self-citationSTAT3 labels a subpopulation of reactive astrocytes required for brain metastasis
Priego, N., Zhu, L., Monteiro, C., Mulders, M., Wasilewski, D., Bindeman, W., Doglio, L., Martínez, L., Martínez-Saez, E., Ramón y Cajal, S., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0044-4 · Cited by 452
Self-citationResponse Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Clinical Trials
Wen, P. Y., Chang, S. M., Van den Bent, M. J., Vogelbaum, M. A., Macdonald, D. R., & Lee, E. Q. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2017.72.7511 · Cited by 435
Self-citationTumor-Treating Fields: A Fourth Modality in Cancer Treatment
Mun, E. J., Babiker, H. M., Weinberg, U., Kirson, E. D., & Von Hoff, D. D. (2018) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-1117 · Cited by 380
Freedman, R. A., Gelman, R. S., Anders, C. K., Melisko, M. E., Parsons, H. A., Cropp, A. M., Silvestri, K., Cotter, C. M., Componeschi, K. P., Marte, J. M., et al. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.18.01511 · Cited by 341
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, N. U., Lee, E. Q., Aoyama, H., Barani, I. J., Barboriak, D. P., Baumert, B. G., Bendszus, M., Brown, P. D., Camidge, D. R., Chang, S. M., Dancey, J., de Vries, E. G. E., Gaspar, L. E., Harris, G. J., Hodi, F. S., Kalkanis, S. N., Linskey, M. E., Macdonald, D. R., Margolin, K., Mehta, M. P., Schiff, D., Soffietti, R., Suh, J. H., van den Bent, M. J., Vogelbaum, M. A., & Wen, P. Y.
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e270-e278
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2145376545
- Cited by
- 1,088
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 39.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response assessment criteria for brain metastases: proposal from the RANO group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(15)70057-4
- The paper
- Lin, N. U., Lee, E. Q., Aoyama, H., Barani, I. J., Barboriak, D. P., Baumert, B. G., Bendszus, M., Brown, P. D., Camidge, D. R., Chang, S. M., Dancey, J., de Vries, E. G. E., Gaspar, L. E., Harris, G. J., Hodi, F. S., Kalkanis, S. N., Linskey, M. E., Macdonald, D. R., Margolin, K., . . . Wen, P. Y. (2015). Response assessment criteria for brain metastases: proposal from the RANO group. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(15)70057-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
