The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficacy of the MAGE-A3 cancer immunotherapeutic as adjuvant therapy in patients with resected MAGE-A3-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (MAGRIT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND Fewer than half of the patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are cured. Since the introduction of adjuvant chemotherapy in 2004, no substantial progress has been made in adjuvant treatment. We aimed to assess the efficacy of the MAGE-A3 cancer immunotherapeutic in surgically resected NSCLC. METHODS In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we recruited patients aged at least 18 years with completely resected stage IB, II, and IIIA MAGE-A3-positive NSCLC who did or did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy from 443 centres in 34 countries (Europe, the Americas, and Asia Pacific). Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive 13 intramuscular injections of recMAGE-A3 with AS15 immunostimulant (MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic) or placebo during 27 months. Randomisation and treatment allocation at the investigator site was done centrally via internet with stratification for chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy. Participants, investigators, and those assessing outcomes were masked to group assignment. A minimisation algorithm accounted for the number of chemotherapy cycles received, disease stage, lymph node sampling procedure, performance status score, and lifetime smoking status. The primary endpoint was broken up into three co-primary objectives: disease-free survival in the overall population, the no-chemotherapy population, and patients with a potentially predictive gene signature. The final analyses included the total treated population (all patients who had received at least one treatment dose). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00480025. FINDINGS Between Oct 18, 2007, and July 17, 2012, we screened 13 849 patients for MAGE-A3 expression; 12 820 had a valid sample and of these, 4210 (33%) had a MAGE-A3-positive tumour. 2312 of these patients met all eligibility criteria and were randomly assigned to treatment: 1515 received MAGE-A3 and 757 received placebo and 40 were randomly assigned but never started treatment. 784 patients in the MAGE-A3 group also received chemotherapy, as did 392 in the placebo group. Median follow-up was 38·1 months (IQR 27·9-48·4) in the MAGE-A3 group and 39·5 months (27·9-50·4) in the placebo group. In the overall population, median disease-free survival was 60·5 months (95% CI 57·2-not reached) for the MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic group and 57·9 months (55·7-not reached) for the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·02, 95% CI 0·89-1·18; p=0·74). Of the patients who did not receive chemotherapy, median disease-free survival was 58·0 months (95% CI 56·6-not reached) in those in the MAGE-A3 group and 56·9 months (44·4-not reached) in the placebo group (HR 0·97, 95% CI 0·80-1·18; p=0·76). Because of the absence of treatment effect, we could not identify a gene signature predictive of clinical benefit to MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic. The frequency of grade 3 or worse adverse events was similar between treatment groups (246 [16%] of 1515 patients in the MAGE-A3 group and 122 [16%] of 757 in the placebo group). The most frequently reported grade 3 or higher adverse events were infections and infestations (37 [2%] in the MAGE-A3 group and 19 [3%] in the placebo group), vascular disorders (30 [2%] vs 17 [3%]), and neoplasm (benign, malignant, and unspecified (29 [2%] vs 16 [2%]). INTERPRETATION Adjuvant treatment with the MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic did not increase disease-free survival compared with placebo in patients with MAGE-A3-positive surgically resected NSCLC. Based on our results, further development of the MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic for use in NSCLC has been stopped. FUNDING GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gefitinib or Carboplatin–Paclitaxel in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma
Mok, T. S., Wu, Y.-L., Thongprasert, S., Yang, C.-H., Chu, D.-T., Saijo, N., Sunpaweravong, P., Han, B., Margono, B., Ichinose, Y., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810699 · Cited by 8,261
EQ-SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group
Rabin, R., & Charro, F. D. (2001) · Annals of Medicine · doi:10.3109/07853890109002087 · Cited by 5,613
Goldstraw, P., Crowley, J., Chansky, K., Giroux, D. J., Groome, P. A., Rami-Porta, R., Postmus, P. E., Rusch, V., & Sobin, L. (2007) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1097/jto.0b013e31812f3c1a · Cited by 3,655
First-Line Crizotinib versus Chemotherapy in ALK -Positive Lung Cancer
Solomon, B. J., Mok, T., Kim, D.-W., Wu, Y.-L., Nakagawa, K., Mekhail, T., Felip, E., Cappuzzo, F., Paolini, J., Usari, T., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1408440 · Cited by 3,190
Predictive Gene Signature in MAGE-A3 Antigen-Specific Cancer Immunotherapy
Ulloa-Montoya, F., Louahed, J., Dizier, B., Gruselle, O., Spiessens, B., Lehmann, F. F., Suciu, S., Kruit, W. H. J., Eggermont, A. M. M., Vansteenkiste, J., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.44.3762 · Cited by 436
Self-citation
Cited by
Saxena, M., van der Burg, S. H., Melief, C. J. M., & Bhardwaj, N. (2021) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-021-00346-0 · Cited by 1,581
Lung cancer immunotherapy: progress, pitfalls, and promises
Lahiri, A., Maji, A., Potdar, P. D., Singh, N., Parikh, P., Bisht, B., Mukherjee, A., & Paul, M. K. (2023) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-023-01740-y · Cited by 1,102
Weber, J. S., Carlino, M. S., Khattak, A., Meniawy, T., Ansstas, G., Taylor, M. H., Kim, K. B., McKean, M., Long, G. V., Sullivan, R. J., et al. (2024) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(23)02268-7 · Cited by 916
Therapeutic cancer vaccines: Advancements, challenges, and prospects
Fan, T., Zhang, M., Yang, J., Zhu, Z., Cao, W., & Dong, C. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01674-3 · Cited by 597
Cell membrane coated-nanoparticles for cancer immunotherapy
Zeng, Y., Li, S., Zhang, S., Wang, L., Yuan, H., & Hu, F. (2022) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2022.02.023 · Cited by 238
Metadata
- Authors
- Vansteenkiste, J. F., Cho, B. C., Vanakesa, T., De Pas, T., Zielinski, M., Kim, M. S., Jassem, J., Yoshimura, M., Dahabreh, J., Nakayama, H., Havel, L., Kondo, H., Mitsudomi, T., Zarogoulidis, K., Gladkov, O. A., Udud, K., Tada, H., Hoffman, H., Bugge, A., Taylor, P., Gonzalez, E. E., Liao, M. L., He, J., Pujol, J.-L., Louahed, J., Debois, M., Brichard, V., Debruyne, C., Therasse, P., & Altorki, N.
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-06
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 822-835
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2344034377
- Cited by
- 511
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 47.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of the MAGE-A3 cancer immunotherapeutic as adjuvant therapy in patients with resected MAGE-A3-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (MAGRIT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(16)00099-1
- The paper
- Vansteenkiste, J. F., Cho, B. C., Vanakesa, T., De Pas, T., Zielinski, M., Kim, M. S., Jassem, J., Yoshimura, M., Dahabreh, J., Nakayama, H., Havel, L., Kondo, H., Mitsudomi, T., Zarogoulidis, K., Gladkov, O. A., Udud, K., Tada, H., Hoffman, H., Bugge, A., . . . Altorki, N. (2016). Efficacy of the MAGE-A3 cancer immunotherapeutic as adjuvant therapy in patients with resected MAGE-A3-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (MAGRIT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(16)00099-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.