Cited by 399Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchMultiple and Secondary Primary CancersChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments

Preleukaemic clonal haemopoiesis and risk of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms: a case-control study

Open access
Takahashi, Koichi, Wang, Feng, Kantarjian, Hagop, Doss, Denaha, Khanna, Kanhav, Thompson, Erika, Zhao, Li, Patel, Keyur +12 more·2017·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

Background Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms are secondary malignancies that are often fatal, but their risk factors are not well understood. Evidence suggests that individuals with clonal haemopoiesis have increased risk of developing haematological malignancies. We aimed to identify whether patients with cancer who have clonal haemopoiesis are at an increased risk of developing therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. Methods We did this retrospective case-control study to compare the prevalence of clonal haemopoiesis between patients treated for cancer who later developed therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (cases) and patients who did not develop these neoplasms (controls). All patients in both case and control groups were treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA) from 1997 to 2015. We used the institutional medical database to locate these patients. Patients were included as cases if they were treated for a primary cancer, subsequently developed therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, and had available paired samples of bone marrow from the time of therapy-related myeloid neoplasm diagnosis and peripheral blood from the time of primary cancer diagnosis. Patients were eligible for inclusion as age-matched controls if they were treated for lymphoma, received combination chemotherapy, and did not develop therapy-related myeloid neoplasms after at least 5 years of follow-up. We used molecular barcode sequencing of 32 genes on the pretreatment peripheral blood samples to detect clonal haemopoiesis. For cases, we also used targeted gene sequencing on bone marrow samples and investigated clonal evolution from clonal haemopoiesis to the development of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. To further clarify the association between clonal haemopoiesis and therapy-related myeloid neoplasm development, we also analysed the prevalence of clonal haemopoiesis in an external cohort of patients with lymphoma who were treated in a randomised trial of front-line chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone, with or without melatonin. This trial was done at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 1999 and 2001 (protocol number 98-009). Findings We identified 14 cases and 54 controls. Of the 14 cases, we detected clonal haemopoiesis in the peripheral blood samples of ten (71%) patients. We detected clonal haemopoiesis in 17 (31%) of the 54 controls. The cumulative incidence of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms in both cases and controls at 5 years was significantly higher in patients with clonal haemopoiesis (30%, 95% CI 16-51) than in those without (7%, 2-21; p=0·016). In the external cohort, five (7%) of 74 patients developed therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, of whom four (80%) had clonal haemopoiesis; 11 (16%) of 69 patients who did not develop therapy-related myeloid neoplasms had clonal haemopoiesis. In the external cohort, the cumulative incidence of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms at 10 years was significantly higher in patients with clonal haemopoiesis (29%, 95% CI 8-53) than in those without (0%, 0-0; p=0·0009). In a multivariate Fine and Gray model based on the external cohort, the presence of clonal haemopoiesis significantly increased the risk of therapy-related myeloid neoplasm development (hazard ratio 13·7, 95% CI 1·7-108·7; p=0·013). Interpretation Preleukaemic clonal haemopoiesis is common in patients with therapy-related myeloid neoplasms at the time of their primary cancer diagnosis and before they have been exposed to treatment. Our results suggest that clonal haemopoiesis could be used as a predictive marker to identify patients with cancer who are at risk of developing therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. A prospective trial to validate this concept is warranted. Funding Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas, Red and Charline McCombs Institute for the Early Detection and Treatment of Cancer, NIH through MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant, and the MD Anderson MDS & AML Moon Shots Program.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30626-x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with CHIP and solid tumors or lymphoma have an increased risk of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms after treatment for the primary disease.

    “Several studies have found that patients with CHIP and solid tumors or lymphoma have an increased risk of these therapy-related myeloid neoplasms after treatment for the primary disease 73–75.”

    From Clonal hematopoiesis in human aging and disease (2019) · cites this paper as [75]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Takahashi, K., Wang, F., Kantarjian, H., Doss, D., Khanna, K., Thompson, E., Zhao, L., Patel, K., Neelapu, S., Gumbs, C., Bueso-Ramos, C., DiNardo, C. D., Colla, S., Ravandi, F., Zhang, J., Huang, X., Wu, X., Samaniego, F., Garcia-Manero, G., & Futreal, P. A.
Affiliations
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Futreal, P Andrew
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
100-111
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2557652172
Cited by
399
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 2
FWCI
36.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30CA016672)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Keywords
therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, secondary malignancies, cancer survivors, clonal evolution, lymphoma, melatonin, risk factors, targeted gene sequencing, hematologic malignancies
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Clone Cells, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hematopoiesis, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Neoplasm Staging, Neoplasms, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Texas, Biomarkers, Tumor, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Incidence, Survival Rate, Case-Control Studies, Neoplasms, Second Primary, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review