The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Post-operative stereotactic radiosurgery versus observation for completely resected brain metastases: a single-centre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY Background After brain metastasis resection, whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) decreases local recurrence but may cause cognitive decline. We performed this study to determine if stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the surgical cavity improved local tumor tumor-free recurrence rates compared to surgical resection alone as an alternative to the need for immediate WBRT. Methods The main entry criteria for the study included patients >3 years of age, with a Karnofsky Performance Score ≥ 70, who were able to undergo an MRI scan and who had a complete resection of 1–3 brain metastases (the maximum diameter of the resection cavity had to be ≤4cm). Patients were assigned randomly to either SRS treatment of the resection cavity (within 30 days of surgery) or observation (OBS). Patients were stratified by histology, tumor size, and number of metastases. Patients were recruited at a single tertiary cancer center. The primary endpoint was time to local recurrence in the resection cavity assessed by blinded central review of brain MRI scans in the intention-to-treat population. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (Trial NCT00950001, status: closed to new participants). Findings Between 8/13/2009 and 2/16/2016, 132 patients were randomized to OBS (N=68) or SRS (N=64), with 128 patients available for analysis. We stratified by metastasis size (maximum diameter of ≥3 cm vs. <3 cm), histology (melanoma vs. other), and number of metastases (one vs. two or three). The 12-month local tumor recurrence-free rate was 43% (OBS) (95% CI 31%–59%) and 72% (SRS) (95% CI 60%–87%) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24–0.88, p=0.015). Interpretation This prospective randomized trial of patients undergoing surgical resection for 1–3 brain metastases indicates that SRS administered to the resection cavity significantly lowers local recurrence compared to observation alone. Thus, the use of SRS after brain metastasis resection is an alternative to WBRT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534
Sperduto, P. W., Kased, N., Roberge, D., Xu, Z., Shanley, R., Luo, X., Sneed, P. K., Chao, S. T., Weil, R. J., Suh, J., et al. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.38.0527 · Cited by 1,425
Self-citation
Cited by
Planchard, D., Popat, S., Kerr, K., Novello, S., Smit, E. F., Faivre-Finn, C., Mok, T. S., Reck, M., Van Schil, P. E., Hellmann, M. D., et al. (2018) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy275 · Cited by 2,274
Treatment for Brain Metastases: ASCO-SNO-ASTRO Guideline
Vogelbaum, M. A., Brown, P. D., Messersmith, H., Brastianos, P. K., Burri, S., Cahill, D., Dunn, I. F., Gaspar, L. E., Gatson, N. T. N., Gondi, V., et al. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.21.02314 · Cited by 832
Self-citationLe Rhun, E., Weller, M., Brandsma, D., Van den Bent, M., de Azambuja, E., Henriksson, R., Boulanger, T., Peters, S., Watts, C., Wick, W., et al. (2017) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx221 · Cited by 637
Le Rhun, E., Guckenberger, M., Smits, M., Dummer, R., Bachelot, T., Sahm, F., Galldiks, N., de Azambuja, E., Berghoff, A. S., Metellus, P., et al. (2021) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2021.07.016 · Cited by 592
Current approaches to the management of brain metastases
Suh, J. H., Kotecha, R., Chao, S. T., Ahluwalia, M. S., Sahgal, A., & Chang, E. L. (2020) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-019-0320-3 · Cited by 553
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahajan, A., Ahmed, S., McAleer, M. F., Weinberg, J. S., Li, J., Brown, P., Settle, S., Prabhu, S. S., Lang, F. F., Levine, N., McGovern, S., Sulman, E., McCutcheon, I. E., Azeem, S., Cahill, D., Tatsui, C., Heimberger, A. B., Ferguson, S., Ghia, A., Demonte, F., Raza, S., Guha-Thakurta, N., Yang, J., Sawaya, R., Hess, K. R., & Rao, G.
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1040-1048
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2725029513
- Cited by
- 789
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 53.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Post-operative stereotactic radiosurgery versus observation for completely resected brain metastases: a single-centre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30414-x
- The paper
- Mahajan, A., Ahmed, S., McAleer, M. F., Weinberg, J. S., Li, J., Brown, P., Settle, S., Prabhu, S. S., Lang, F. F., Levine, N., McGovern, S., Sulman, E., McCutcheon, I. E., Azeem, S., Cahill, D., Tatsui, C., Heimberger, A. B., Ferguson, S., Ghia, A., . . . Rao, G. (2017). Post-operative stereotactic radiosurgery versus observation for completely resected brain metastases: a single-centre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30414-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.